Weather Zip Code:
Des Moines , IA
More Information
Conditions
32°
Wind Speed S, 3 MPH
Humidity 92 % Wind Chill 32°F
Dew Point 30°F Barometer 30.09 in.
Agriculture Markets
Futures MO Last Chg
Corn December 391'0 -4'0
Soybeans January 1046'0 7'0
Wheat December 559'6 -2'6
Milk November 14.06 0.00
Feeder Cattle January 92.675 0.850
Live Cattle December 83.950 0.275
Lean Hogs December 57.600 1.625
Cotton December 70.41 0.00

Enter Zip Code below for LIVE local results.

Cash Bids
LDP Quotes
Charts & Quotes

NCBA Urges EPA Not To Regulate Agriculture Out of Business

10/30/2009

Source: National Cattlemen's Beef Association news release

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) criticized flawed and inconclusive science in an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particulate Matter (i.e. dust). 

The study was done as part of a required review of the coarse particulate matter standards. 

“Coarse particulate matter is nothing more than the dust kicked up by cars or trucks traveling on dirt roads, a tractor tilling a field, or cattle moving around on dirt,” explains Tamara Thies, NCBA’s Chief Environmental Council.  “Studies do not show that rural dust is a health concern.”    

In 2006, EPA set coarse particulate matter standard of 150 micrograms per cubic meter of air.  When EPA began reviewing the NAAQS in 2008, they determined that the evidence of health effects from this level of coarse particulate matter was inconclusive.  

In July 2009, however, EPA reinterpreted that inconclusive evidence and made use of a flawed study to suggest that there are adverse health effects from dust at levels that are ten times lower than the current standard. 

“EPA is suggesting a level of 12 to 15 micrograms of dust per cubic meter of air,” says Thies. “That is below naturally occurring levels of dust throughout many Western states—including pristine National parks.” 

If EPA were to set the air standards at this level, much of the country would be over the limit.  “Cattle producers are concerned about this because it would limit our ability to raise livestock, who kick up dust as they walk around,” Thies says. “But this issue goes well beyond agriculture. States would be required to impose extreme control requirements and limitations on many businesses to ensure that the standard is met.”

“We are urging EPA to reject this faulty study and refrain from setting an air quality standard for dust lower than naturally occurring levels, and effectively halting economic growth and development.” 

 



Email Article to a Friend

Your Email:    
Your Friend's Email:    
Message to add to the body:

Search Beef Today:



Farm Journal Media Family

© 2009 AgWeb.com - The Homepage of Agriculture
AgWeb.com is a Division of Farm Journal Media, Inc.
Quotes by eSignal delayed 15 minutes