Sep 21, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

The Value of Residue

December 11, 2009
By: Charles Johnson, Farm Journal Editor

Figuring the real value of the residue on your fields is more important than ever now that stalks, stubble and cobs may be used to produce biofuel. What does that residue contribute to yield? How about water savings?

Simon van Donk is finding out. He's the water resources/irrigation specialist at University of Nebraska's West Central Research and Extension Center in North Platte.

His plots in tests for two years indicate corn may yield as much as 25 bu. per acre more with good residue in place compared with plots hand-cleaned of residue. He's working to determine why.

"We sparingly irrigated the crop, trying to simulate a deficit irrigation situation. The bare plots and residue plots got the same amount of water. On the bare plots, the corn was turning yellow and breaking off at the top of the stalk because it was dry. Corn on the bare plots was water-stressed more, which probably explains the 25 bu. per acre yield difference,” van Donk says.

In the first year of the test, water savings in the residue plots was minimal, he says, but, of course, producing an additional 25 bu. of corn requires some water, too.

"Looking at work by other researchers, my estimation is that it takes 2" to 4" of water to bump up the crop from 172 bu. per acre on bare soil to 197 bu. per acre on the residue plots. There is less evaporation in the residue plots, which could be what the yield increase can be attributed to,” van Donk says.

Corn planted into residue yielded 25 bu. per acre more than bare plots the first year, 17 bu. per acre more than the bare plots the second year.

"In the second year, the amount of water that stayed in the top 4' of soil in the residue plots was 1½" to 2" more than in the bare plots,” van Donk says.

"Most people know or believe that with more residue you can save water. The big question is about how much. In an average year, do you save 1", 5" or 7"? We're trying to get the quantification better than what we know now,” van Donk says.

After two years of looking at corn, van Donk's work will now focus on soybeans. He's curious to see if soybeans respond to residue as corn did.

"Soybeans may be different than corn because of the canopy cover.

Previous 1 2 Next

See Comments

FEATURED IN: Farm Journal - December 2009
RELATED TOPICS: Agronomy, Livestock, Water

Log In or Sign Up to comment


No comments have been posted



Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions