Sep 21, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

BeefTalk: Records, a Positive Opportunity

August 13, 2014
BT Backgrounding Chute Calves 4

Not all success is associated directly with meticulous recordkeeping, but those who keep records with factual-based goals certainly will have less positive or negative surprises.
By: Kris Ringwall, Beef Specialist, NDSU Extension Service

As summer appears to be waning and fall soon will be upon us, I can remember a former co-worker, Harlan Hughes, saying; "You can’t manage what you don’t measure."

The meaning never changes. The statement is true because you can’t manage what you don’t measure. As producers prepare for another weaning season, I certainly hope they will not bypass the opportunity to record in writing factual data about their beef operation.

As the world seems to move faster, one of our human weaknesses is the tendency to go with "gut instinct" and forgo the collection of meaningful data. There always is the option to read what everyone else is doing and then simply assume that the data also applies to one’s own operation. These assumptions, again a product of our human weakness, tend to assume the best.

However, much like school, all students are on the honor roll until after the first test. Life is no different. In this case, the test is production and financial performance.

Not to date myself, but following graduation from North Dakota State University in the fall of 1975, I weighed my first calves in Ramsey County for the North Dakota Beef Cattle Improvement Association. So after almost 40 years of encouraging producers to "measure what they need to manage," I quickly can reference many herds that excel in beef production.

Those herds that are managed well have been able to capitalize and convert beef to dollars during some good times in the cow-calf segment of the industry. The financial advantage of the current upturn in calf prices and subsequent opportunity for increased positive net returns in the cow-calf business have proven to be real.

Granted, not all success is associated directly with meticulous recordkeeping, but those who keep records with factual-based goals certainly will have less positive or negative surprises.

The North Dakota Beef Cattle Improvement Association started in 1963, so why don’t all producers record and track individual cow-calf data? I’m sure the reasons are many. Time and cost probably are at the top of the list. Labor translates into time and is not easy to find. Historically, most labor was homegrown and supplemented with neighbors. Unfortunately, the labor pool is decreasing.

On a positive note, with increased revenue, the opportunity to offset labor with better equipment is real. Now would be a good time to look around at some equipment dealers to see what might be available. Electronic ear tags, Bluetooth technology, wireless connections and more chute-side rugged scale heads have made the job of tagging, vaccinating and weighing calves manageable.

It just takes a little more reading and perhaps a little time to get everything plugged in. Under those conditions, I would have no trouble putting that scale in the chute and collecting the performance data needed to evaluate the cows.

However, let’s take a look at reality during the upcoming fall season. Many producers have cattle spread 30 to 50 miles between pastures. Depending on the price and availability of grass, the distances could be even greater.

Previous 1 2 Next

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Cattle, Beef News

Log In or Sign Up to comment


No comments have been posted



Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions