Jul 11, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

Comment Period Closes on Controversial GIPSA Livestock Marketing Plan

November 22, 2010
By: Roger Bernard, Farm Journal Policy and Washington Editor

Today marked the final day to submit comments to USDA's Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) on their controversial proposed rule on livestock marketing practices. And those in support of and against the plan have been very vocal about relating their positions.

The critics have clearly gotten the attention of GIPSA, as the agency has put a lot of effort into defending the plan. On their website, there are two different documents which answer questions about the proposal. One is a simple question and answer format, while the other seeks to address what GIPSA says are "misconceptions" about the plan.

Follow these links to read more:

Misconceptions and Explanations
Questions & Answers about Proposed Rule

As another reflection of GIPSA realizing their proposal is controversial, after the original comment period was about half-way through, GIPSA acted to extend the comment period by 90 days -- to today instead of Aug. 23, 2010, as originally proposed.

Meanwhile, a host of groups have offered up economic studies that signal potential costs of the plan far exceed the levels that USDA has suggested.

Those against the rule have produced two different sets of economic analysis of the plan, with both suggesting costs run well above what GIPSA estimated in their proposal -- up to more than $1 billion.

And it's interesting to note that the commentary in favor of the proposal, or at least many of the examples of why the rule is needed, came from the series of competition workshops that USDA and the Dept. of Justice have held around the country this year.

The final such session will be Dec. 8 in Washington, DC, where the subject area is listed as "margins." It will be interesting to see how the agenda for that meeting unfolds. As one looks through the documentation offered by GIPSA in the items linked to above, they relied on anecdotal information, not bona fide economic analysis. Some of the comments they highlight in the documents did come from congressional hearings, but the bulk are from the workshops or a public meeting GIPSA held as well.

Previous 1 2 Next

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Beef, Hogs, USDA, Risk Management, Economy, GIPSA

Log In or Sign Up to comment


No comments have been posted



Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions