Oct 2, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

Corn and Soybean Prices Influence Supply

March 15, 2011

Phyllis Picklesimer, University of Illinois

In the Jan. 18 Weekly Outlook, it was suggested that corn and soybean prices had the dual objectives of
(1) allocating old-crop supplies so as to maintain pipeline supplies at the end of the year
(2) directing spring planting decisions.
"Specifically, these prices needed to ensure an increase in corn acreage and maintain soybean acreage at the 2010 level," said University of Illinois economist Darrel Good.
For soybeans, the declining pace of both the domestic crush and exports, along with the prospects for a large increase in double-cropped acreage in 2011, suggested that soybean prices had increased enough by mid-January to accomplish the dual price objectives.
"That conclusion was reinforced by the improving condition of the Brazilian soybean crop and prospects for a record harvest in 2011. The USDA confirmed prospects for a record large Brazilian soybean crop last week," he said.
Soybean prices increased another 40 cents from Jan. 18 to the peak on Feb. 9. Since then, May 2011 soybean futures have declined about $1.30. The decline in November 2011 futures has been only slightly less, he said.
"For corn, the conclusion in mid-January was that prices would need to remain very strong to slow the pace of consumption and to motivate a large increase in planted acreage," Good noted.
May 2011 corn futures increased nearly 60 cents from Jan. 18 to the peak on March 4. December 2011 futures increased about 40 cents to the much earlier peak on Feb. 11, he said.
"Corn prices have declined sharply since early March and are now back to the level of mid-January. The rapid decline suggests the market believes that corn prices have accomplished their objectives. The likelihood that old crop consumption has been slowed enough comes from two perspectives," he said.
First is the macro-perspective. Recent world events are seen as a threat to the fragile economic recovery that is under way. Political unrest in North Africa and the Middle East has pushed crude oil and gasoline prices nearly 15 percent higher in the past month. Those higher prices could slow economic growth and curb commodity demand, including demand for agricultural commodities, he noted.
"Now the devastating earthquake and tsunami in Japan may challenge the Japanese and world economies, pointing to the possibility of a further slowdown in global demand growth," he said.
The second perspective of corn demand comes from the flow of information relative to the pace of consumption. During the first half of the 2010-11 marketing year, ethanol production, and presumably the amount of corn used for ethanol production, was 15 percent larger than during the same period last year, Good said.
"Last year, however, ethanol production was relatively small during the first half of the corn marketing year and accelerated rapidly in the last half of the year. Year-over-year increases in ethanol production will be much smaller for the last half of the 2010-11 marketing year. Still, use during that period needs to be only 2.3 percent larger than use of a year ago to reach the USDA projection of 4.95 billion bushels of corn used for ethanol production," he said.
The pace of corn exports has also been slow enough that the USDA projection of marketing-year exports of 1.95 billion bushels is not expected to be exceeded. Although the pace of corn export sales accelerated during the five weeks ended Feb. 24, the pace of shipments remains generally slow. Cumulative marketing-year export inspections through March 10 were about 10 million bushels less than the total of a year ago, he said.
"In addition, Census Bureau estimates of corn exports through January were only 26 million bushels larger than cumulative inspections. Last year, census estimates through January exceeded inspections by 63 million bushels," he said.
Like last year, exports will have to increase rapidly in the last half of the year in order to reach the USDA projection for the year. That pace may now be threatened by the situation in Japan, although not much is known about damage to total port capacity, transportation infrastructure, or the livestock industry. Japan is the largest importer of U.S. corn, and as of March 3, 116 million bushels of corn sales to Japan had not been shipped, he noted.
"Finally, corn prices have been pushed lower by ideas that producers have already made plans for a large increase in corn acreage in 2011. Some are projecting planted acreage above the USDA expectation of 92 million acres and even above our calculation of a needed 93 million acres. These expectations of large corn acreage underscore the importance of the USDA's March 31 Prospective Plantings report," he said.


See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Corn, Soybeans, Marketing, Crops, USDA, Analysis

Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (6 Comments)

Daniel - Pine City, MN
With the july corn prices taking a nose dive fron 7.40 to 6.24 today all that means to me is that people will be buying alot of corn now, and they will be burning up all the carry over corn. Any hick up in spring planting, we could easy see 8.00 corn again by july.
1:52 PM Mar 16th
blueflash62 - tyndall, SD
i dont think plantings intentions uses figures from farmers hardly at all. from what i have heard they can really get a good idea just from talking with the seed companies. i feel they dont need to ask a farmer much of anything, i think they get bushels from crop insurance yields and elevator reports.​
4:12 PM Mar 15th
dell farms - midlandcity, AL
I total agree with the comments on here I am a farmer far 30 years and I never fill the intention out correctly most of the time I throw them in trash. The folks that does planting attention know more about what the farmers going to plant then the farmer does. I totally agree need to pay farmer far crop or it want get planted. Crop is a long ways from getting planted
3:03 PM Mar 15th
Craig - Rush City, MN
If they keep screwing around with the prices like they have been, there is no way that they will get the acres needed. This is not the way you are going to get the farmers to plant more.
9:52 AM Mar 15th
Hans - ND
i really get sick and tired of how much emphasis is put on the plantings intentions report year after year....after all its just intentions ....i know farmers who have thrown their intentions form in the trash or have completely skewed their answers!!!
7:41 AM Mar 15th
Hans - ND
i really get sick and tired of how much emphasis is put on the plantings intentions report year after year....after all its just intentions ....i know farmers who have thrown their intentions form in the trash or have completely skewed their answers!!!
7:41 AM Mar 15th



Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions