Jul 28, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

Coverage Considerations

January 7, 2013
By: Katie Humphreys, Farm Journal Managing Editor
 
 

What to expect when you sign up for crop insurance

Amid other lessons, the titanic drought of 2012 gave farmers an education in crop insurance—and a reminder that it’s as vital a tool in a marketing plan as options or calls.

As of Dec. 10, crop insurance companies have paid more than $8.7 billion to farmers for losses in 2012, according to USDA’s Risk Management Agency (RMA). Art Barnaby, Kansas State University risk management Extension specialist, says that number could reach $15 to $16 billion by mid-2013 when claims are paid in full.

Contrary to what farmers think, the magnitude of claims in 2012 won’t impact crop insurance premium rates in 2013, says Keith Coble, Giles Distinguished Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics at Mississippi State University. Premium rates for 2013 were set before complete 2012 yield and loss information was known. Looking to 2014, when 2012 losses will catch up to premium rates, increases likely won’t be as large as anticipated because of the weather indexing process used to set premium rates, Coble adds. "In locations where 2012 was an unusual weather year, losses will not receive as much weight as more typical years," he explains.

Consider the following five points when nailing down crop insurance coverage for 2013:

1 Premium rate changes. This year marks the second year of premium rate changes for RMA following an independent study and peer review process (see maps at right). The revised premium rates incorporate: 

  • Integration of weather data, so losses from rare weather events receive an appropriate weight in the overall process used to set rates.
  • Refinements of premium loads for prevented planting and replant payments. Previously, these loads were determined at a state and regional level. Now they are determined based on weather districts within each state, reducing the degree that excess losses in one part of the state unduly influence premium rates in another part.
  • More weight on loss experience from recent years, which better reflects current agronomics and the crop insurance program.


2 Yield trend factors. In its second year, trend-adjusted actual production history (APH) is being expanded for most of the U.S. for yield protection or revenue protection policies. Basically, a trend adjustment factor is estimated for each crop and county. This factor is equal to the estimated annual increase in yield and is based on county average yields determined by the National Agricultural Statistics Service. Each yield reported in the individual insurance unit’s APH is adjusted upward by the trend adjustment factor times the number of years since the yield was recorded.

3 Hit to yield average. A significant yield hit in 2012 will reduce APH in some cases—and a lower APH means a lower per-acre revenue guarantee, Coble says.

"On an individual farm, a lower APH will automatically increase premium rates, unless there is a larger rate reduction set by RMA," Barnaby adds. "However, premium dollars per acre will increase or decrease depending on the increase or decrease in the spring base price."

When insuring a field with limited APH, a major crop loss has a much greater effect since the low-yield year is a large part of the average, explains Nathan Kohls, crop insurance agent at the Citizens State Bank in Moundridge, Kan. "Trend adjustment has only a limited effect until the yield database has more than five years of history."

In most cases, though, trend adjustment will roughly offset the decrease in APH, keeping the APH near 2011 levels, he adds.

4 Enterprise units. "While enterprise units have been available since the ’08 farm bill and are popular in some areas, there are still producers who need to look at enterprise units more carefully," Coble says. An enterprise unit combines all of the acres of a particular crop within a county. "Almost always, switching to enterprise units will lower costs such that a higher coverage level can be taken," Coble adds.

READ MORE
Previous 1 2 3 Next

See Comments

FEATURED IN: Farm Journal - January 2013

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

No comments have been posted



Name:

Comments:

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

 
 
Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
bayer
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions