Sep 19, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

House Approves $39 Billion Food-Stamp Cut

September 20, 2013
capitol downtown
  
 
 

When Andres Gonzalez’s mother lost her job two years ago, the former student at South Texas College applied for food stamps, a federal aid program for the poor.

"It gave me more time to focus on looking for work and going to school, instead of having to worry about where I’m going to get my next meal," said Gonzalez, 24, who left the nutrition assistance program earlier this year after he found work as a warehouse supervisor in McAllen, Texas.

Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives view the aid more skeptically, arguing it’s rife with waste and abuse. Legislation passed the chamber yesterday that would cut $39 billion from nutrition programs over a decade, a roughly 5 percent reduction that would end food-stamp benefits for 3.8 million Americans next year.

The vote came a day after the release of new U.S. Census Bureau data showing 46.5 million people living in poverty, close to 15 percent of the population and near a two-decade high.

During the debate, Republicans cited the example of a surfer in California who said he used food stamps to buy lobster. They also said the aid programs, which have expanded rapidly since the economic downturn, are too often viewed as a permanent government subsidy rather than short-term relief.

"The reforms made by this bill will put people on the path to self-sufficiency and independence," said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, before the vote. ‘

 

Close Vote

 

The vote was close -- 217 Republicans supported it, while all 195 Democrats and 15 Republicans, mostly from the Northeast, opposed it.

Opponents, who had brought in soup-kitchen leaders and a celebrity, Tom Colicchio from television’s "Top Chef," to attack the bill, said the measure was "heartless."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the legislation amounted to "snatching food out of the hands" of the poor. The Nevada Democrat said the House would do better to vote on a Senate-passed bill, which he said saves $23 billion over a decade, including $4 billion from the food-stamp program, "without forcing needy children to skip meals."

READ MORE
Previous 1 2 3 ... Next

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Policy, 2013 Farm Bill

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

No comments have been posted



Name:

Comments:

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

 
 
Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
bayer
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions