Aug 20, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

Prioritizing Resource Use on Cattle Operations Part 2: Physical and Financial Resources

March 4, 2014
Land and Bull
Physical resources are typically thought of as resources that you can touch, including land and cattle.  
 
 

By: Jane Parish, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

Cattle operation owners and managers are continuously faced with resource use decisions. Yesterday’s article addressed prioritizing the use of people and time resources on cattle operations. This article picks up the resource use discussion with a focus on the physical and financial resources of cattle operations.

Physical Resources

Physical resources are typically thought of as resources that you can touch. These include tangible assets such as land, cattle, equipment, supplies, etc. As with other resource categories, physical resources must be managed appropriately to maintain, enhance, and grow that particular resource base. Cattle and forages require a certain level of care to survive and even more management to thrive. Non-living physical resources require care as well. Farm equipment, fences, and other objects require routine maintenance and ultimately replacement over time. Land and water resources must be managed, too. There is much truth to the adage that cattle producers are stewards of natural resources.

Both the quantity and quality of physical resources determine the production potential of the operation. Management then determines the degree to which this production potential is achieved with the physical resources available. Take cattle as an example. The total pounds of calf sold off of a commercial cow-calf operation typically increases as cattle numbers increase, genetics improve, and/or management gets better. So the quantity and quality of physical and human resources as inputs impacts the quantity of output, in this example, pounds of calf sold.

Quality of output produced from resource use matters as well. The value of the pounds of calf produced varies depending upon marketing conditions and channels used and calf attributes. One pound of a lightly muscled or unthrifty calf likely has less value in the marketplace than one pound of a heavily muscled and healthy calf. Yet the financial investment in producing the more valuable calf is often greater than that of producing the less valuable calf. Producers should strive to find an optimum mix of physical resource quantities and qualities to fit with the chosen management level and budget and then match appropriate management of those resources to create the most value relative to cost.

A challenge is for producers to decide on key quality standards for physical resources as well as resource quantity goals. Is having a large cow herd of marginal quality cattle more important than having a smaller herd of top-end genetics? The best answer to this question may differ amongst producers based on their physical, financial, human, and time resource bases and external conditions. Some producers are very good at making money on large volume cattle sales, while others successfully focus on capturing premiums for fewer head.

Producers can choose from a spectrum of combinations of resource quantity and quality combinations. For a given financial investment, the amount of a physical resource that can be acquired within a set budget varies depending on the quality of the resource. A few acres of very fertile and well-fenced pastureland may require financial investment equal to that of greater acreage of less fertile, more poorly developed pastureland.

So where is the optimum combination of input quantity and quality? By now it should be apparent that these decisions are complex and involve interactions of many different types of resources. Furthermore, the optimum combination may change over time as both internal and external conditions change. This leads back to the importance of having talented and motivated managers in place to make informed decisions and work towards continuous operational improvement.

Financial Resources

Note that financial resources have already been mentioned in the discussions of the other resource categories. Getting and keeping good people is often tied to money or other benefits that cost money. Time and money are tightly linked; think interest rate terms over different time periods. The amount and quality of physical resources that an operation can access is funding dependent. No matter the resource use decision, there is a tie in to finances.

Reaching financial goals is often a driving force behind operational decisions. The financial well-being of the operation underlies all resource use decisions, constrains how large and fast the operation can grow, and determines how long the operation can continue to exist. Even if cattle production is a "hobby" and a producer is "not in it for the money", financial resources going into the operation should be managed and put to good use. Well-managed finances are prudent regardless of whether cattle production is a livelihood or hobby.

READ MORE
Previous 1 2 Next

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Management, Cattle, Extension News

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

No comments have been posted



Name:

Comments:

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

 
 
Enter Zip Code below to view live local results:
bayer
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions