Jul 28, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

Wheat Stirs an Unlikely Border War

April 15, 2013
By: Ben Potter, AgWeb.com Social Media and Innovation Editor google + 
WheatHarvest
  
 
 

U.S. and Canada wheat production stirs controversy

The United States and Canada tend to get along very well — but sometimes even the best of neighbors have disagreements. The wheat industry finds itself wrapped in controversy as farmers on both sides of the border struggle to buy varieties and sell their grain fairly.

"This issue has been around for a long time," says Vince Smith, an agricultural economics professor with Montana State University, who has been tracking the marketing squabbles and trade disputes between the two countries over the years.

Smith says an important change came last August, with the implementation of the Marketing Freedom for Grain Farmers Act in Canada. This Act changed the way Western Canadian wheat and barley farmers market their grain by removing the mandatory requirement to sell their crops through the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB). The CWB has been the sole buyer of Canadian wheat since 1935 — now, famers have more options when marketing their crops.

The resulting import/export implications are complex — "It’s not completely clear what the rules are," Smith says — but some of the new guidelines are spelled out in a FAQ on the following website: http://canada-usgrainandseedtrade.info.

Dismantling the CWB’s monopoly has not been a comprehensive solution, either. Grading inconsistencies between the U.S. and Canada are a concern for some farmers who want to market their crop in both countries, such as Montana wheat farmer Gordon Stoner.

"The problem going north right now is the Canadian varietal act," Stoner told the Billings Gazette. "To get a grade, wheat in Canada must be an approved variety. If it’s not, it has to be graded as [lower value] feed wheat."

Meantime, Smith says that although there are positive aspects of the CWB’s demise, he is also bracing some for potential unintended consequences of the change. As a matter of marketing policy, CWB restricted the range of varieties Canadian farmers could plant. One outcome of this policy is that the majority of row crop production in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Alberta is currently incentivized to plant hard red winter wheat or canola. Now, these incentives may shift.

"The much bigger issue over the next few years is, will Canadian growers demand and receive wider options on what they can plant?" Smith says.

It won’t happen overnight, but if Canada taps into hard red spring wheat varieties, the country could significantly affect the market – resulting in an influx of as much as 20% more red spring wheat, he says. That could jeopardize the premium market that hard red spring wheat farmers in states like Montana and North Dakota currently enjoy.

"I’m more concerned with some of the long-term implications of the demise of the CWB than the short-term grain-handling issues," Smith says.

Other areas to watch. North Dakota State University crops economist Frayne Olson says Canada is just one of several wheat-growing regions to monitor.

"The world wheat market is very liquid," he says. "There are a lot of buyers and a lot of sellers. Because of that, the market factors can be more complex than corn or soybeans."

READ MORE
Previous 1 2 3 Next

See Comments


 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (1 Comments)

Jason - Richard, SK
Seems in a free market society there are always those who want to be protected. May the most efficient grower succeed. I suppose we could farm like Russia where it doesn't really matter.
8:37 PM Apr 15th
 



Name:

Comments:

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive the AgWeb Daily eNewsletter today!.

 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions