May 21, 2013
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin

 

November 2010 Archive for A Closer Look

RSS By: Dairy Today: A Closer Look

A Closer Look

Give Calves Their Fill During Winter’s Chill

Nov 29, 2010

To help calves survive and thrive in cold weather, diet is the first line of defense. 

 

Keeping water lines thawed and moving snow aren’t the only extra tasks that Old Man Winter creates on the dairy. Carefully managing calf nutrition is another demand that requires attention during the frigid winter months.Calves at dairy   web

“Newborn calves start out life with very minimal energy reserves,” says Mike Van Amburgh, Ph.D, associate professor of Animal Science at Cornell University. “Because calves have a higher surface-area-to-bodyweight ratio than older animals, they become cold-stressed at fairly moderate temperatures.”

At temperatures below the “thermoneutral zone,” calves start to expend their internal energy reserves simply to maintain their core body temperature of 102ºF. The result: Energy resources are diverted from growth and immune function, meaning calves will not gain weight, and they’re more susceptible to diseases like pneumonia and scours.
           
Van Amburgh says the thermoneutral zone for three-week-old Holstein calves is 68ºF to 82ºF, but at temperatures below 60ºF, calves have to increase energy expenditure to maintain body temperature. For calves from 22 days of age to weaning, it is approximately 42ºF, depending on insulation and rumen function. “When an 88-pound newborn calf has to start mobilizing its own fat stores to stay warm, it has less than one day’s worth of energy in the bank,” he notes. 
 
Colder weather demands higher nutrition
           
To help calves survive and thrive in cold weather, diet is the first line of defense. Because young calves three weeks and under have little to no rumen function yet, nearly all of the required extra energy must come from the liquid feed source.
           
Whether milk replacer or pasteurized waste milk is the primary liquid feed source, calves will use more energy when temperatures drop. Van Amburgh says a traditional milk-replacer program of feeding 20% protein, 20% fat milk replacer at a rate of 1 lb. of dry powder per day (2 qt. of milk replacer fed twice a day at standard dilution rates) will result in strictly maintenance for the calf, with no remaining energy for weight gain at temperatures below the thermoneutral zone.
           
Pasteurized whole milk fed at the same volume will provide 11% to 18% more energy due to its higher protein and fat content. However, consistency of nutrient levels in whole milk can vary considerably day to day, which requires careful monitoring of this feed source. Increasing nutrient levels in whole-milk feeding programs to accommodate for colder temperatures also may require supplementation with milk replacer, depending on the volume of waste milk available on the dairy.
           
Higher-protein milk-replacer rations fed at more appropriate rates provide considerably higher energy levels and allow calves to withstand colder temperatures while still gaining weight. Table 1 (below) shows a comparison of a 20:20 milk-replacer feeding program and a feeding program utilizing more of a 28% protein, 20% fat milk replacer. At 32ºF ambient temperature, calves on the 28:20 program still would be expected to gain 1.41 lb. per day, with no adjustments to the feeding program.
           
Van Amburgh advises working with a nutritionist to select and properly adjust liquid feed rations to accommodate for cold temperatures, noting that a 100-lb. calf may require more than double the amount of 20:20 milk replacer powder per day to achieve 1 lb. of gain per day at an ambient temperature of 5ºF. 
           
“Feeding a fat supplement in cold weather is another common suggestion,” notes Van Amburgh. “Most of those products are 7% protein and 60% fat. Supplementing a standard, pound-per-day, 20:20 milk-replacer ration with 0.25 lb. per day of a 7:60 fat source at 32ºF will increase the energy allowable to gain by just 0.22 lb. per day, which is just slightly above maintenance. Thus, feeding more of an appropriately balanced diet to meet the requirement for both energy and protein for allowable gain would be a more effective approach to compensate for cold stress.”
 
Tips for winning the winter battle
           
In addition to carefully evaluating liquid feeding programs, Van Amburgh provides additional advice for keeping calves healthy and growing in extreme cold:
·         Provide housing that is draft-free with good air quality, and keep calves dry at all times.
·         Use deep straw bedding to give calves a place to “nest” and thus conserve body heat. Many producers also successfully use calf jackets to also help conserve body heat.
·         Feed liquids as close to the calf’s internal body temperature as possible. Most milk-replacer manufacturers suggest feeding at 100 ºF to 105ºF. Supplying liquid feed or water at much cooler temperatures requires the calf to expend energy to warm the liquid to its internal body temperature after consumption, and can increase bloat problems.
·         Offer a high-quality (20% protein or higher), free-choice starter grain to encourage rumen development and provide supplemental energy. The protein level of the starter should be commensurate with that of the liquid feeding program.
·         Provide warm, free-choice water to promote dry feed intake and improve digestion, weight gain and overall health of calves. While this can be challenging in the winter, offer water for 20 to 30 minutes immediately post-feeding. Calves are still up and active at this time, which will help to encourage intake within a timeframe that is manageable for then disposing of unconsumed water before it freezes.
           
“Caring for calves in the winter provides its own set of challenges, to be sure,” says Van Amburgh. “But well-nourished, properly housed calves can grow well and remain exceptionally healthy, even in the most extreme conditions, and we now know this early growth has long-term benefits when they reach lactation.” 
 

 

 
Table 1.          Effect of cold stress on predicted calf growth using the 2001 Dairy                             NRC calf model (National Research Council, 2001). A 100-lb. calf was                                     used as the model animal.
 
Temperature,              Milk replacer               Energy allowable        Protein allowable
Degrees F                   formulation and           gain, lb./day                 gain, lb./day
                                    intake, lb./day
           
                                    20:20
 
68                                1.0                               0.46                             0.53
50                                1.0                               0.05                             0.53
32                                1.0                               0.00                             0.53
 
                                    28:20
 
68                                2.0                               1.96                             1.96
50                                2.0                               1.67                             1.96
32                                2.0                               1.41                             1.96

 

Seven Steps to Reducing Mastitis and Improving Milk Quality

Nov 01, 2010

With European dairy customers tightening their somatic cell count (SCC) requirements to 400,000, interest in improving milk quality is growing.

Jim Salfer, with University of Minnesota Extension Service-Stearns County, and Jeff Reneau, with the University of Minnesota, Department of Animal Science, have compiled seven general steps for solving a high SCC problem.  
 
Here’s their list:
 
1. Define the problem.
Use DHIA and/or on-farm records, bulk tank SCC records, bulk tank cultures and individual cow cultures to try and understand which cows are infected and when they are getting infected.
 
2. Identify the troublemakers.
Use bulk tank and individual cow cultures to determine what main organisms are causing elevated SCC or clinical cases. Different organisms will require different solutions.
 
3. Generate possible causes and solutions.
Based on the information you gathered in steps 1 and 2, work with your diagnostics team to generate a list of possible causes and consider possible solutions. If there are multiple causes, you will need to use a multiple-pronged approach. The use of a cause-and-effect diagram may be helpful in this process. Decide on the most likely causes and the best solutions.
 
4. Develop an action plan.
Work with your team to develop an action plan based on step 3. Determine how the preferred solutions will be implemented, who will be responsible for the implementation, and who will need to be trained.
 
5. Set up plan to monitor progress.
One of the most important components of any plan is to set up monitors to show whether your plan is working. The use of multiple monitors (e.g., BTSCC and bulk tank culture) is often best since no monitor is perfect. Some possible monitors:
·         Bulk tank SCC graph for each milk pickup
·         Monthly bulk tank culture for mastitis pathogens
·         Individual cow DHI SCC
·         CMT of all fresh cows (How many cows are calving infected? Which quarters are infected?)
·         Culture of all fresh cows with high CMTs (What organisms are causing infection?)
·         Culture of all new clinical cases and new sub-clinical infections (new cows over 200,000 SCC) each month (What organisms are causing infection?)
·         New infection rate on all cows (goal < 5%)
·         New infection rate on fresh cows (goal <10%)
·         Rate of clinical mastitis (goal < 2%/month)
 
6. Carry out the plan.
Make the changes you and your team decided is appropriate based on facts. Be careful not to tinker with the plan unless there is strong evidence the plan is not working.
 
7. Monitor progress and adjust plan as needed.
Review the monitors and progress monthly (or more frequently) to determine if the desired progress is being made. If it is, continue on the same course. If not, find out why. Is the problem the plan of action itself or failure to successfully implement the plan? Reevaluate the action plan and/or retrain personnel. Continue to fine-tune your plan until you achieve your SCC goals. Progress can be slow depending on the causes of the high SCC or clinical mastitis problem or the plan being implemented. However, if you use a systematic approach, you will make consistent progress toward your goal. Once reached, a low SCC will reward your farm with increased profitability and personal satisfaction.
 
If you’re curious about how your dairy’s milk quality stacks up, take this quiz from the University of Minnesota. 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2013 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions