Aug 23, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions Sign UpLogin


Top of Mind

RSS By: Jeanne Bernick, Top Producer

Jeanne, Top Producer Editor, grew up on a beef cattle operation in Southwest Missouri and now writes from the heart of corn country in Eastern Iowa.

Who's behind the RFS waiver request?

Jul 23, 2008
The EPA announced this week it would delay any decision on granting Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s request for a waiver on the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The government agency says that given the amount of work remaining to sufficiently answer the Texas request (the EPA received over 15,000 public comments), there is no way it can offer a final decision by the deadline of July 24. It hopes to reach a decision by early August.
 
Although EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson says the process will remain “fair and open”, and that “no agreements have been made with any party in regard to the substance and timing of the decision on the waiver request,” can the same be said for Gov. Rick Perry’s decision to ask for the RFS waiver in the first place?
 
According to a story in the Houston Chronicle earlier this month, Perry's waiver request came after the governor met with Texas poultry producer Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim. Six days after Perry met with Pilgrim in March, Pilgrim donated $100,000 to the Republican Governors Association, which Perry chairs. The businessman also spent more than $9,000 on airfare in June so Perry and three aides could attend a conference in Washington promoting the waiver, according to the Houston Chronicle.
 
And he donated $25,000 to Perry's political committee about a month after the waiver request was made.
 
In all fairness, Perry has opposed food-based ethanol production for some time, and his office has denied any connection to Pilgrim's donations, reports the Chronicle. Some of the country's largest grocery manufacturers have joined corn, livestock and poultry producers in a campaign against ethanol, blaming the motor fuel additive for rising grocery prices.
 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (8 Comments)

Anonymous
The idea that grain producers have subsidized the hog, beef and poultry sectors is indeed amusing as I'm sure it was intended. The final decision to reject the waiver request is one case where the government acted in the public's best interest. Corn based ethanol is a transitionary biofuel, the subsidization of which will lead to extremely economical and environmentally favorable cellulosic offspring.
11:35 AM Aug 26th
 
Anonymous
Um, mandating biofuels was a bad idea in the first place. Focussing on who Governor Perry met with is avoiding the basic issue: the government has given a legal priority to fuel over food. And as for political donations, none have been as big or as long-standing as those provided by one of the leading producers of ethanol, ADM.
3:45 PM Jul 26th
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions