|
Saturday, December 02, 2006
The problem of imaginary properties...
The organic issue gets more difficult even as it get more popular. Because organic is about how things are produced and not about the product itself, the rush to secure the market premium for organic food is becoming the realm of lawyers and regulators who can discuss with straight face how many organic angels can dance on the head of an organic pin. Today's example is organic fish, which my counterpart at AgDay - host Scott Kinrade - has his shorts in a knot over. While it strikes him as absurd, he is young and not wise to the ways of the organic world, where perception is everything, and objective measurement is scorned. At the moment, there is no federal standard for labeling fish as He is not the only observer puzzled by the bizarre nature of non-organic nature. Fear not - I shall counsel the young Jedi. Where the organic definition gets truly theological is in prepared foods. How about organic salad dressing? Or organic macaroni and cheese? ![]() Personally, I would prefer some preservatives in foods that hang around in my refrigerator for a few weeks, but those whose lives are diminished by the presence of extremely low risk materials in their food now have a choice. I have no beef with organic buyers or producers. I also have no argument with folks who wear those magnetic bracelets to relieve pain until they tell me they are for real. Then I need to see some data - not anecdotes. Pass the preservatives, please.
Comments:
John,
I couldn't agree with you more. I found in my inquiry into organic production that my $500 certification fee would buy me more risk, not less, should any "potential contamination" be rightly or wrongly be traced back to my farm. Also,my grain was deemed not qualified for their market, but a requested sample of organic spelt contained wild oats, Canadian thistle, bird droppings, and grasshopper parts. What is wrong with this picture?
John,
I couldn't agree with you more. I found in my inquiry into organic production that my $500 certification fee would buy me more risk, not less, should any "potential contamination" be rightly or wrongly be traced back to my farm. Also,my grain was deemed not qualified for their market, but a requested sample of organic spelt contained wild oats, Canadian thistle, bird droppings, and grasshopper parts. What is wrong with this picture?
I do not oppose efforts to add value to farm production by methodology - organic, natural, grass-fed, etc. I simply want the claims to be about methods and not content, unless measurable differences can be verified.
A few months ago I discovered organic tobacco. Knowing that people pay more to smoke organic cigarettes illustrates the absurdity of the organic movement.
Post a Comment
<< Home US Farm Report host John Phipps surfs the Web so you don't have to...
About MeJan and I farm 1700 acres near Chrisman, IL. I have also written humor and commentary for Farm Journal and Top Producer for 13 years. Please visit my website (www.johnwphipps.com) to learn about my speaking services for your group's next meeting. ARCHIVES
April 2006 /
May 2006 /
June 2006 /
July 2006 /
August 2006 /
September 2006 /
October 2006 /
November 2006 /
December 2006 /
January 2007 /
February 2007 /
March 2007 /
April 2007 /
May 2007 /
June 2007 /
July 2007 /
MORE FROM JOHN
On the Coffee TableWhat's for Dinner |
Farm Journal • Top Producer • Beef Today • Dairy Today • AgDay U.S. Farm Report • Pro Farmer • Pro Farmer Members AgWeb Professional - Subscription Information • Add AgWeb.com to your Favorites FAQ • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Advertise on AgWeb.com Quotes by eSignal • Quotes delayed at least 10 min © Copyright 2006 AgWeb.com a division of Farm Journal, Inc. |
| Home | Agriculture News | Weather | Money & Markets | Ag Discussions | Site Map | |