|
John's World
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Tell me about it...
Maybe the weather is screwy for a reason. More rain and snow is falling in Canada, Britain and northern Europe, two-thirds of which is attributable to human activities. Britain is suffering one of its wettest summers ever, with severe flooding in England. More rain is also falling in areas immediately south of the equator including Brazil, southern Africa, Indonesia and Australia. Nearly all of this is caused by mankind. But countries immediately north of the equator, in Africa, India and parts of China, are getting less water. [More](Be sure to follow the link to a helpful map) ![]() Meanwhile, the sun is quiet. A little too quiet... While sidewalks crackle in the summer heat, NASA scientists are keeping a close eye on the sun. It is almost spotless, a sign that the Sun may have reached solar minimum. Scientists are now watching for the first spot of the new solar cycle to appear. The 11 year long solar cycle is marked by two extremes, solar minimum and solar maximum. Solar minimum is the period of least solar activity in the solar cycle of the sun. During this time sunspot and solar flare activity diminishes, and often does not occur for days at a time. [More]And if you've been wondering like me, where are all the forecasted hurricanes? Though hurricane season begins on June 1, the stormiest months tend to be August and September, when conditions in the Atlantic basin are most ripe for a hurricane to develop. During these months, ocean temperatures are warmer and there is typically less wind in the upper atmosphere to shear the tops off of developing storms.Could it be weather guys enjoy the media coverage so much, they are taking a page from the Homeland Security Dept. who seem to be making ORANGE as low as we'll ever see? Try to imagine who would have the guts to lower it to green, for example. All I want to know is why we can't get as similar 5-day forecast on Friday as we get Sunday. These weekend price plunges are bumming me out. Friday, July 13, 2007
The excuse they have been waiting for...
Since the OK by shareholders, real-world plans for merging the CBOT and CME are gathering momentum. Although it has seemed obvious to many besides me, this event offers the perfect opportunity to allow open-outcry to dwindle to a spectator curiosity. The Merc's purchase of the CBOT marks a transition from pit to electronic trading, said Caitlin Zaloom, an assistant professor at New York University and author of ``Out of the Pits: Traders and Technology from Chicago to London'' (University of Chicago Press, 238 pages, $29). Brokers who appear on the show have been remarking for months how floor traders spend much of their time watching the screens during side-by-side trade, and how volume is shifting to e-trade. The success of e-CBOT trading demonstrates that institutional investors especially like this method, and as they go, so goes the bulk of trades. Farmers have always had a love-hate relationship with traders, associating (unfairly, it turns out) the human element of open outcry with the possibility of human manipulation. Still, producers are equally suspicious of computer transactions too. Labels: marketing, technology Wednesday, June 27, 2007
iPods hurt corn farmers...
The entertainment industry is getting hysterical in its push to prevent video file-sharing (and outright piracy). In a breathtaking overreach, NBC is alleging video piracy hurts me out here on the farm, since fewer people will be going to the theater and won't be eating 5-gallon tubs of popcorn. We can all have a good snicker, but obviously some copywriter considers the American farmer the perfect pathetic victim poster-boy, like handicapped children or baby animals. Wonder how they get such ideas? And I wonder if any other farmers have wearied of hiding behind an public image of genial incompetence. [Thanks, Rodger] Saturday, May 05, 2007
The future is optional...
While many producers are watching the CBOT buyout with mild interest and eyes glazed by so many zeroes, it may simply be just a sideshow in a larger push to find a play for enormous amounts of money. Right now, derivatives are the investment of choice, it seems. Derivatives are so called because they derive their value from an underlying asset, such as a stock, bond, interest rate or commodity. Their use has exploded over the past couple of decades. Philadelphia is one of six American exchanges that trade options (which give holders the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a security). Futures, the other big exchange-traded derivative, are promises to buy or sell on a given date. [More]With computer algorithms driving stock trading, what's a broker to do with her free time? Trade somewhere else, I suppose, and here on the farm, we're the game people are betting on. The attraction, as outlined in the article above is manifold: Joshua Carter of Goldman Sachs sees “derivatisation” as one of the three main trends in the exchange business, along with consolidation and “electronification”. One attraction, he points out, is that derivatives are typically more liquid than their underlying assets. Also, their highly mechanical nature makes them well suited to algorithmic trading, which is growing. And transaction costs are lower than stocks for a given unit of exposure.All this could mean some very, very wealthy commodity brokers soon. But then, they could be the last of their breed, too. Open outcry will likely be kept on just for background footage for ag video - like gambrel barns and windmills. Hey - we use it at USFR. Sunday, April 15, 2007
The tortilla problem...
For those of us who eat Mexican just for a change of pace, the story of tortilla prices may seem mildly annoying. But to Latin America, it is not. The NCGA wandered off the Logic Reservation with their spin-laden response: Rising tortilla prices in Mexico are due to a supply issue in that country – not increased U.S. ethanol production or U.S. corn prices. The U.S. Grains Council (USGC) and the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) report that lower corn production in Mexico and the lack of import licenses have caused white corn shortages there. [More]Umm - guys, you can't proclaim ethanol as the reason for higher corn prices and then say higher corn prices can't be blamed on ethanol. White corn prices are calculated from the same CBOT price as yellow. Even if we had open corn trade, white corn prices would be high. The short crop is an issue, and so is ethanol. Economist Tyler Cowen has an excellent post on the tortilla price issue in light of ethanol demand. And his normally hard-nosed capitalist approach falters unexpectedly. American corn ethanol policy seems like a bad idea for sure. Let's open up our markets to superior Brazilian sugar-based ethanol. That would lower American and also Mexican corn prices.The analysis is sound, but like many of us, there are some issues where allegiance to a free market is tested and found wanting. This does not suggest that we have a binary choice for economic policy, but simply litmus-testing every question is insufficient criticism. Markets can be inefficient - recognizing when they are, and how to adjust is the tough part. Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Here we go...
Think speculative money is leaving corn? Maybe not. Corn investors are gleeful about the first bear market in two years. This kind of press in investor papers is one reason we're not seeing a new "plateau" in prices. We're seeing higher mountain ranges. They've even helpfully calculated exactly how much you can make. Goldman Sachs analyst Jeffrey Currie in London forecast on March 30 that corn will rise to $4.15 a bushel in six months from $3.66 on April 5. Because of the leverage involved in futures markets -- the exchange requires a deposit of only $1,350 to control $18,300 of corn -- that would create a 181 percent return by the time of the Iowa harvest. What could go wrong? Labels: marketing Tuesday, April 03, 2007
Respecting the segments...
Even agribusiness behemoths like Cargill have figured out how to segment the farm market. Check the cute video about selling feed in Poland. (It's the one with the farmer and animals.) I like to think of farming in three sectors: industrial, agrarian, and recreational. Calling myself and other like me industrial is upsetting to some, but it's the best adjective I could find. The problem for many is abandoning the agrarian image, because they are not comfortable in their own minds with their "industrial" actions. And of course, they rightly fear loss of government support if they do not claim to be agrarian. Meanwhile, the market not only has figured it out, it's taking advantage of our split personality by selling industrial tools and coaxing industrial output with soothing agrarian images and words. Labels: culture, marketing, production Thursday, March 22, 2007
Maybe it's something about the chair...
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is deservedly famous for two things: cryptic pronouncements that somehow proved all things to all listeners, and easy money. For a while, it looked like his successor Ben Bernanke was going to be another breed of cat. But the recent announcement by the FOMC (short for "Op Loan Interest Rate Czars") was notable in that, in the face of some inflation pressures, the Fed appears to be opting for growth. One succinct summary was part of my advisory message from Roach Ag Marketing (I carefully ignore advice from several quality sources): First, it is not what they did that was important but it is what they said that made all the difference. Fed chief Ben Bernanke basically said that he is more willing to consider the fall off in the housing market and the blow up in the sub prime lending market as a more important consideration short term then inflation. Translation: he is likely preparing the market for the potential for rate cuts in the weeks ahead.These comments line up well with my own take - in itself a scary thought for the author Shawn Hackett. We are already seeing significant ag inflation: rents, fuel, fertilizer, etc. Now that could be matched with modest consumer inflation: food (of course, that's partly ethanol's fault), anything imported (dollar plummeting), and services. I have opined before about fixed-rate penalties for ag loans. As you write loans for the machinery now flying out of dealer lots and land you can now almost pay for, make sure you don't lock in a very expensive unneeded interest rate guarantee. I think Ben's a chip off the ol' block... Wednesday, February 28, 2007
The risk shell game...
It is convenient to blame yesterday's market turmoil on the Chinese. After all, they are inscrutable, ya know. And to be sure the decision by their "Fed" to curtail irrational exuberance was a key factor. There are also plenty of other factors.
But the rest of the story is perhaps better understood by trying to figure out who is actually at risk now and how much. Not an easy job. One concern is that the heavy wiring in the markets could not keep up with the rapid changes. Another is the rapid growth of derivatives. The problems in the subprime mortgage sector have focused attention on the slicing and dicing of risk using sophisticated instrument such as collateralised debt obligations and credit default swaps. Banks have used these to shed credit risk, but it is not clear where all that risk now lies. Financial shares were hit particularly hard on Tuesday, suggesting that nerves are starting to jangle over this uncertainty. Shares in Goldman Sachs, perhaps the smartest of the financial alchemists, ended down 6.6%. This was partly due to its Asian exposure (it owns a stake in a big Chinese bank). But its role in conjuring up and trading exotic financial instruments was probably also a factor. [More] While farmers are struggling to cope with options strategies, guys in suits worth more than my pickup are devising exotic financial instruments to hand risk around like a hot potato. Tuesday, somebody ended up holding it. To be honest, I have trouble with options strategies. It's easy to misplace what success looks like. Moreover, I am comfortable with the production and price risks as they occur in the real world. While I doubtless could make some money being more aggressive in the use of risk instruments, my guess is it would take utilize time that I can be doing something else more personally or financially rewarding. Just because an action makes money doesn't mean it doesn't have to compete with other choices that offer different or even better rewards. Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Thankya...thankya veramuch...
Today's grain rally is brought to you by: yours truly. I sold yesterday, convinced the top was in. Is it just me or is this market a little screwy? Maybe not. Note this commentary from Chip Flory - if you read it slowly it starts sounding like Rumsfeld and the "known unknowns and the unknown unknowns" Spooky... Labels: marketing US Farm Report host John Phipps surfs the Web so you don't have to...
About MeJan and I farm 1700 acres near Chrisman, IL. I have also written humor and commentary for Farm Journal and Top Producer for 13 years. Please visit my website (www.johnwphipps.com) to learn about my speaking services for your group's next meeting. ARCHIVES
April 2006 /
May 2006 /
June 2006 /
July 2006 /
August 2006 /
September 2006 /
October 2006 /
November 2006 /
December 2006 /
January 2007 /
February 2007 /
March 2007 /
April 2007 /
May 2007 /
June 2007 /
July 2007 /
August 2007 /
September 2007 /
October 2007 /
MORE FROM JOHN
On the Coffee Table |
Farm Journal • Top Producer • Beef Today • Dairy Today • AgDay U.S. Farm Report • Pro Farmer • Pro Farmer Members AgWeb Professional - Subscription Information • Add AgWeb.com to your Favorites FAQ • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Advertise on AgWeb.com Quotes by eSignal • Quotes delayed at least 10 min © Copyright 2006 AgWeb.com a division of Farm Journal, Inc. |
| Home | Agriculture News | Weather | Money & Markets | Ag Discussions | Site Map | |