Apr 17, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin

Fed’s Moves Are Positive for Agriculture

November 3, 2010
 
 

Today’s announcement by Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke, keeping interest rates where they are while buying $600 billion of Treasuries through June, should mean good news for agriculture.

The announcement is no surprise—most analysts expected what was dubbed “QE2” because it is the second round of “quantitative easing,” though the consensus figure was $500 billion.
 
The practice is controversial and economists and monetary policy analysts question whether it will achieve its goal of boosting employment.
 
However, “the Fed is out of economic arrows in its quiver,” says Dan Basse of AgResource. “By buying Treasury debt, they remove some of it from the market and at the same time, put new money into the economy, hopefully boosting monetary velocity.”
 
This infusion of dollars could boost inflation, which is actually one of the goals of the Fed, which believes that inflation in the 2% area is needed for economic growth. “The definition of inflation is more dollars chasing fewer goods and this strategy in theory will do that,” says Basse. That prospect will drive more speculative money into commodities, he adds. “This bodes bullish for all commodities.” Listen to Basse's full comments.
 
At the same time, putting more dollars into circulation means the dollar is cheaper. Since August, when Bernanke said the Fed would do “all it can” to keep the recovery going, the dollar index has dropped 7%. That’s good news for U.S. ag exports since it makes our products cheaper to those buying in other currencies, but makes imports—such as fertilizer—more expensive to U.S. farmers.
 

Dollar Index

dollarindex

 

 

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Farm Business, Policy, Marketing

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (1 Comments)

Tim Gieseke - MN
If the market signal is higher grain prices and higher inputs costs, one would assume that micromanagement of a field would bring you a greater return than macromanaging a landscape. Hopefully the loser in this is not the natural capital that provides the bounty and that the ag industry can put on the back burner. In the Upper Midwest, large operations demand black dirt management so they can squeeze through every window available That is cashing in natural capital for time, as the market does not recognize the value of natural capital. Go, Go, Going...Gone.
10:27 AM Nov 5th
 



Name:

Comments:

Hot Links & Cool Tools

    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  

facebook twitter youtube View More>>
 
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions