Jul 11, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin


Economic Sense

RSS By: Matt Bogard, AgWeb.com

Matt's primary interest is in the biotech industry and ag policy.

Clean Water Restorarion Act

Aug 08, 2009
By Matt Bogard

The Clean Water Restoration Act ( see a recent and related Agweb News Headline here) attempts to remove the requirement that bodies of water be ‘navigable’ to be federally regulated. Unfortunately, many don’t think critically about environmental problems. As economist F.A. Hayek has pointed out to us, the requisite knowledge for solving many of our problems seldom presents itself in complete integrated form. Instead, it is dispersed among multitudes of individuals and circumstances.

Technology has allowed for many environmental problems in Agriculture to be internalized. The use of global positioning systems and biotechnology are examples of how markets have utilized the dispersed knowledge of individuals acting in their own interest to help mitigate environmental problems.

Family farms make up 98% of all farms, and small farms account for 70% of farm real estate. These operations will be affected most by this legislation. They currently manage the resources that would fall under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act should the CWRA pass. These producers have specialized knowledge with regards to producing food in an environmentally sustainable manner. If the CWRA is passed, it could substitute the limited knowledge of a few government experts for the well-coordinated knowledge and experience of multitudes of farmers. Is there any reason for us to believe that this would necessarily be better for the environment?
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (3 Comments)

Anonymous
That Constitution is just to restictive any how maybe we should just get rid of it anyhow
8:08 PM Aug 10th
 
Matt Bogard
That's a good point. You will probably agree that the constitutionality of this legislation will likely hinge on an unelected, elite legal scholar's ( Supreme Court Justice) verbose, lengthy, esoteric, expansion of the term 'interstate commerce' as opposed to the simple historical cognitive meaning of the words written in the constitution for all Americans to easily understand and interpret. If it is too complicated for the average person to understand, then it is probably a legal argument intended to transfer power away from the people to benefit as Abraham Lincoln described, the 'interested sophistry' of elites. As Economist Thomas Sowell terms it, these actions represent the 'quiet repeal of the American Revolution.'
12:15 PM Aug 8th
 

Hot Links & Cool Tools

    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  

facebook twitter youtube View More>>
 
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions