Jul 14, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin

Milk: The Double-edged Sword of the Beef Cowherd

December 9, 2013
FJM 5750
Milk is clearly a good thing in the beef cowherd.  
 
 

By Jay Jenkins, UNL Extension Educator

Milk is clearly a good thing in the beef cowherd. Heavier milking cows produce heavier calves.

But at what cost?
High milk cows pay a biological penalty relative to cows with lower milking ability. This penalty occurs in two ways:

1) Additional feed required
• Higher milk cows require more nutrients to support their greater milk production. (NRC, 1996)
• Higher milk cows have higher maintenance requirements. Which means they require more nutrients year around than a similar sized cow with lower milking ability. (Ferrell and Jenkins, 1984) This is believed to be related to a greater visceral organ mass relative to empty body weight. (Jenkins et al., 1988)

2) Diminishing returns to additional milk.
A study conducted at UNL (Lewis et al., 1990) had three groups of cows with similar body size, but with different levels of milking ability. They found that the importance of the dam’s milk in increasing weaning weight was greatest for calves from the low milk group and least for the high milk group.
• In the low milk group each 11.8 pounds of additional milk that the cows gave equated to one additional pound of calf weaning weight.
• The medium milk group required 15.2 added pounds of milk from the dam to produce the same one additional pound of calf weaning weight.
• The high milk group needed 52.6 pounds of dam milk to produce that one additional pound of calf weaning weight.

High milk cows are less efficient
An analysis of the biological and economic efficiency for the three levels of milk production in that same UNL study found that the low milk group was not only more biologically efficient (calf weight/total feed energy required), but were more economically efficient as well (income/expenses) (van Oijen et al., 1993).

The researchers ended their paper by stating, "Recommendations to use breeds of cattle with high milk levels as dams in commercial production and to select for higher milking ability in beef breeds already with an adequate milk level are questionable."

How has the industry responded?
What has happened in the industry in the 20 years since those researchers cautioned us against adding higher than necessary levels of milk in a beef cowherd?

There has been a strong genetic trend for increased milk in virtually every major beef breed, except those that originated as dual-purpose breeds. In Angus cattle, for example, the average milk EPD has increased from approximately six pounds in 1990 to 23 pounds in 2013.

At least we are getting heavier calves as a result of the increased milk, right?
Maybe so, but you would be hard pressed to find the data to support it. Three major collections of cowherd performance records show virtually no increase in average weaning weight over the last 20 years (Kansas Farm Management Association; North Dakota Cow Herd Appraisal Performance Software Summary; and the New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas Standardized Performance Analysis Summary).

How can this be?
Limited forage resources appear to be the likely culprit.

In an Oklahoma study reported by Brown et al. in 2005, cows with the highest milking ability actually gave less milk than cows with average milking ability as forage quality declined during the summer.

The decline in nutritive value of forage had greater effects on higher-milking cows than the cows with average milk yield.

Not surprisingly, the researchers reported that there was an interaction between cow size and the level of milk that the forage could support. They stated, "There seems to be a practical maximum sire milk EPD for heavier cows, above which, increases in daughter milk yield do not occur, with the maximum effective sire EPD becoming smaller as cow size increases."

What does all this mean?
The obvious answer is that it is possible to get too much milking ability in your herd.

Cows with higher levels of milking ability cost you more to feed than those with lower milking ability. Not only that, but in cows where milking ability is too high to be supported by your feed resources; you may actually see them wean lighter calves. Increased costs, lower returns, now that is bad news!

It may also mean that you need to stop selecting for increased milking ability.

Given the research findings, and the genetic trend of the nation’s cowherd, it is very likely that your cowherd is near the practical maximum for your ranch.

Unfortunately there is no one-size-fits-all milk EPD that will work for every ranch. It depends on cow size, available feed resources, how and when you market, and many other factors.

What can you do?
Look over your cowherd and your records for clues.

High milk cows often have lower body condition scores than low milk cows. There is also a tendency for high milk cows to have longer calving intervals, later calving dates, and lower calving percentages than cows with lower milking abilities.

Look over the milk EPDs of your bull battery and compare them to your weaning weights. Be careful though, weaning weights vary considerably due to environmental conditions. Consider growth EPDs as well. It is possible that higher weights may be due to more growth rather than more milk.

Our industry has a long history of crazy trends that take a long time to recover from, let’s not make milking ability become one of those trends.

References:

Brown, M. A., S. W. Coleman and D. L. Lalman. 2005. Relationship of sire expected progeny differences to milk yield in Brangus cows. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1194-1201. http://journalofanimalscience.org/content/83/5/1194

Ferrell, C. L. and T. G. Jenkins. 1984. Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types. J. Anim. Sci. 58:234-243. http://journalofanimalscience.org/content/58/1/234

Jenkins, T. G., C. L. Ferrell, and L. V. Cundiff. 1988. Relationship of visceral components of mature cows as related to lactation potential and possible effects on productivity. Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. Paper 101. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports/101

Lalman, D. Matching production levels to environmental conditions. http://www.nbcec.org/professionals/slides/bb13/Lalman.pdf

Lewis, J. M., T. J. Klopfenstein, R. A. Stock, and M. K. Nielsen. 1990. Evaluation of intensive vs extensive systems of beef production and the effect of level of beef cow milk production on post weaning performance. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2517-2524. http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/68/8/2517

NRC. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington D.C.

Rasby R. Milk EPD an accurate indicator of milk production and calf performance. http://beef.unl.edu/web/cattleproduction/milkepdindicator

Spangler, M. Profit tip: Matching milk production and cow size to resources. http://beef.unl.edu/web/beef/stories/200809170.shtml

Van Oijen, M., M. Montano-Berudez, and M. K. Nielsen. 1993. 71:44-50. http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/71/1/44

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Beef, Livestock, Calves, Genetics

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

No comments have been posted



Name:

Comments:

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive Beef Today's Cattle Drive today!. Interested in the latest prices for cattle in your area? See highlights of the latest for-sale cattle in the Cattle-Exchange eNewsletter.

 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions