A Tale of Two Crops in Nebraska

August 21, 2012 11:45 PM
 

Irrigation is the force behind strong 2012 yield estimates.


The difference between an irrigated corn field and non-irrigated corn field in Nebraska is as stark at night or day, or brown and green.


Jason Franck, Western Tour Consulting Agronomist for the 2012 Pro Farmer Midwest Crop Tour, says his route saw mostly irrigated fields in Nebraska on day two of the tour. "These look dramatically better than the fields in South Dakota and northern Nebraska."

This year, after 167 corn field samples, yield estimates came in at 131.79 bu./acre, down 14% from last year.


Franck did a side-by-side comparison of irrigated kernels versus non-irrigated kernels.

irrigated field vs non

For soybeans, he says the irrigated fields look phenomenal. "The overall health is really good due to the irrigation and extra water."
 

To finish out both crops, Franck says the best thing would be for temperatures to cool off to slow the crops down a little. He also says rainfall would also benefit the crops.

He provides a from-the-field report:

 

To follow coverage of the event, visit www.agweb.com and www.ProFarmer.com.
 
For More Information
Learn more about the 2012 Pro Farmer Midwest Crop Tour. Follow along on Twitter with the hash tag #pftour12.
 
Take your own field measurements and participate in Pro Farmer’s Virtual Crop Tour
 

 

Back to news

Comments

 

Rate this News Article:

Spell Check

Anonymous
8/22/2012 02:18 AM
 

  I dont think counting Kernals will be acurate this year. since the corn is so dry maybe you should just pull out a scale and weigh your shelled corn. You might be a bit more accurate.

 
 
Anonymous
8/23/2012 06:07 AM
 

  aeromsithpink -- Great comment. You're right. kernel weight will be really important this year. Tour leader Chip Flory even mentioned, he wished we could take some ears into local elevators to measure their true yield potential.

 
 
Close