' /> Chip's Chore Time | Dairy Today

Sep 23, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin

June 2008 Archive for Chip's Chore Time

RSS By: Chip Flory, Pro Farmer

Chore time for me isn't what it used to be when I was growing up on our eastern Iowa farm. In fact... I don't even have horse chores to do any more!

Acreage Report Doesn't Change Corn Outlook

Jun 30, 2008

Chore time for me isn't what it used to be when I was growing up on our eastern Iowa farm, but taking care of two horses in the morning before I head in for work gives me a little time to think about the day ahead. Each morning, stop at this spot to get a feeling for the "tone of the day" - and some attitude about agriculture and the markets.

I was thinking…

... first thing -- the crop recovery around northeast Iowa continues. That's not to say the crop "looks great" or anything like that. And that's certainly not the case further south of here where heavy rains last week recharged field ponds and stressed crops. But, around here, things are "perking up" and growth has been very good -- on the crop that has recovered. There is still a lot of the crop, however, that hasn't recovered -- and won't.

Now, onto this morning's reports: Don't get too shook up by this morning's Acreage Report from USDA. I don't care if you're selling grain or buying feed -- the acreage data impact should be relatively short-lived. Reason -- the data didn't change the situation much at all and it clears the way for the markets to start focusing on yield potential.

USDA's planted acreage estimate of 87.327 million acres of corn tells me one thing -- the March Prospective Plantings Report (indicating 86.014 million corn acres) showed us some "false intentions." The "true intentions" for corn plantings were probably in the range of 88.0 to 88.5 million acres. From that, we've lost enough plantings to get us down to the 87.327 million acre level. And, who knows, the resurvey work USDA's National Ag Statistics Service (NASS) does ahead of the August Crop Production Report should get an even better read on actual plantings.

I appreciated some of the comments USDA made in this report regarding expectations for harvested acres. Here's what it said:

"Extensive rains and flooding during June caused producers in several Midwestern States to change their harvesting intentions for crops already planted, modify planting decisions for the small percentage of acres not yet planted, and consider replanting options. NASS collected most of the data for the annual Acreage Report before the majority of the flooding occurred. In an effort to more accurately determine how many acres producers still intend to harvest for grain, NASS re-interviewed approximately 1,200 farmers June 23, 24 and 25 in the flood-affected areas. As a result, it was determined that U.S. farmers intend to harvest 90.4 percent of their planted acres of corn for grain. This is a change from 92.4 percent as measured during the first 2 weeks of June. U.S. farmers intend to harvest 96.8 percent of their acres of soybeans. Without this additional survey data, historical averages would have indicated 98.7 percent of soybean acres to be harvested. NASS will conduct a more extensive acreage update survey during July. Findings from this study will be incorporated in the August Crop Production Report."

The expectations of a lower harvested acreage percentage on corn and soybeans has, so far, generally gone unnoticed by the markets. With corn plantings at 87.327 million, the 90.4% harvested acreage percentage implies 78.94 million harvested corn acres. At 148.9 bu. per acre, that implies a crop of 11.754 billion bu. -- we'll shy of the expected 2008-09 demand pace of 12.51 billion bushels. So, as things currently stand, we'll drain about 750 million bu. from carryover compared to the current marketing year. That's not much different than the "bullish" June Supply & Demand Report.

Consider this: In the June S&D Report, USDA indicated harvested corn acres in 2008 of 78.8 million. That means just 140,000 acres of the "extra" 1.313 million acres planted to corn will actually be harvested for grain. (Yeah... whoopee!)

That implied crop of 11.754 billion bu. is just 19 million bu. more than USDA's June S&D crop projection. (Hardly justifies the limit-down price action in corn this morning, does it?)

Bottom line: Let the dust settle... "thanks" to the smaller-than-average harvested acreage percentage, today's Acreage Report really didn't change anything from the June S&D report.

Crops are (sort of) recovering.

Jun 25, 2008

Chore time for me isn't what it used to be when I was growing up on our eastern Iowa farm, but taking care of two horses in the morning before I head in for work gives me a little time to think about the day ahead. Each morning, stop at this spot to get a feeling for the "tone of the day" - and some attitude about agriculture and the markets.

I was thinking…

... Okay -- I know I haven't updated the blog for a while, but that was by design. I knew if I sat down to write about Midwest crop conditions before giving crops a chance to recover, I'd be talking a doomsday scenario for the crops. So, I stayed away from updates with the idea the crop would recover and give me something more optimistic to talk about. Well... here it goes --

The corn crop is recovering -- well... at least some of the crop is recovering. I'm not saying the crop in previously saturated areas is recovering 100% of its original yield potential. I'm just saying the crop is greening up and growing again. And in some cases, the crop is growing very quickly as it taps into nitrogen remaining in the soil -- or if growers have had a chance to lay down some more nitrogen right next to the root zone.

But, it is NOT a uniform recovery. In fact, as some parts of fields recover, it becomes exceptionally clear where the real damage has been done. Yes, there is still some water standing in fields, although much of it has drained away. That's what I call "obvious damage" areas and assessing yield impact on those areas is very easy -- it's typically got zero yield potential. So from that perspective, it's just a question of figuring out what percentage of the Midwest crop has that "obvious damage."

That's part of the reason USDA is resurveying growers for planted acres and harvested acres for the June 30 Acreage Report. Hopefully, USDA will figure out we'll likely see a lower-than-usual harvested acreage percentage on both the 2008 corn and soybean crops and reflect that in the acreage report. For the July Supply & Demand Report, USDA will use the June Acreage data. For the August Crop Production Report, USDA will resurvey for planted acres and harvested acreage intentions again. So, but the time we get to the August Crop Production Report, USDA should have a good handle on lost acres -- but I won't guarantee that. USDA in the past has revised harvested acres as late as September in the year following the year the crop was harvested -- at the end of the crop's marketing year. That means that despite USDA's best efforts, we may not know how many acres have been lost until September... of 2009!

The other thing that is becoming abundantly clear is the general damage this year's corn crop has already sustained. I say that because corn fields run the spectrum of colors from yellow to dark green -- all in the same field. If those plants that are still yellow were going to recover, they should be greening up like their row-mates just a few feet away. Who knows what the problem is... compaction, leached nitrogen, root damage... combination of all of those things and probably some issues I didn't list.

And development of the corn plants that haven't tapped into the "good stuff" in the dirt yet is very slow. So -- cornfields are already taking on a wavy look with a variety of colors. Oh... and you can very easily tell where tractors traveled in most cornfields... that where entire yellow rows are framed by green(er) rows on both sides.

In summary, the corn crop is recovering at many different levels and at several different paces. The generally poor recovery of the crop is what we fully expected, but certainly not what we hoped for.

On soybeans, I don't even know what to say. This crop is very slow to develop. Plants are exceptionally small for the end of June. The canopy in drilled beans is still wide open and weed problems are getting worse every day. Growers are getting fields sprayed, but it's ugly out there in bean fields right now. And the plants are so small, there's really no way to tell how much yield potential they've got. And in some fields, the plants seem to be a little "misinformed." In a few fields, 4-inch-tall plants are round little balls with dirt-covered leaves from the last pounding rain we got around here back on June 11-12. I have no idea what those plants are going to produce. And speaking of producing... soybean's reproductive phase is triggered by the time of the year. And beans that did get planted in late May (early to mid-group 2s) should start to flower when summer starts. Well... summer has started and it's scary to think how much yield potential these small, but flowering, bean plants have already lost this year.

Log In or Sign Up to comment


Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive Dairy Today's eUpdate today!

The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions