Jul 22, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin


December 2009 Archive for Dairy Talk

RSS By: Jim Dickrell, Dairy Today

Jim Dickrell is the editor of Dairy Today and is based in Monticello, Minn.

Glad Dairy Tidings, and Other Good News

Dec 21, 2009

By Jim Dickrell

The dairy news from Washington, Copenhagen and New York last week was (mostly) positive for beleaguered dairy producers, as they count their Christmas blessings in a few days and hope for a much brighter 2010.

• From Washington, USDA finally released details of the $290 million Dairy Economic Loss Assistance Payment (DELAP) program last Thursday. If you haven’t heard by now, the program will pay dairy producers 32¢/cwt for milk produced between February and July 2009 times 2. The production cap is 6 million lb. per dairy per year.

The production cap, at 20,000 lb./cow, equates to about a 300-cow herd.  Complaints from out West, most notably California, are that the production cap is too low. But keep in mind that if USDA had shared the dollars equally, the payment rate would have fallen to about 15¢ or 16¢/cwt. on an annualized basis.

That means that all herds with less than 600 cows, roughly speaking, would receive less under the equalized payment than with the announced 32¢/cwt. payment. Who is more deserving: Small or large herds? USDA opted to go with strength in numbers—more smaller farmers and more political support from Midwest and Northeast Congressmen.
 

My suggestion: Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth and cash the check—whatever the amount is.

• From Copenhagen, U.S. Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack announced a memorandum of understanding  (MOU) with the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 25% by 2020. Important note: The effort will be voluntary. It also will not create new funding sources for emission-reducing efforts. But it will allow USDA to both target and expedite existing USDA programs such as EQIP and REAP toward greater energy savings.

Dennis Haubenschild, a Princeton, Minn., dairy producer, was excited by the news. “It’s the best news I’ve heard this year,” he told me last week. Haubenschild and his family (spouse Marsha and sons Tom and Bryan) have been operating a methane digester for the past decade. They are also trying to develop hydrogen cell fuel technology from the surplus methane produced by their digester to produce fuel and fertilizer. But that effort has stalled from lack of funding. USDA’s MOU could jump start those efforts and dozens of other projects around the country.
 

USDA is hoping more methane digesters will be built on dairy farms over the next decade. Today, fewer than 150 are producing gas. As more digesters come online, the technology will be refined so that smaller herds can benefit as well.

• And from New York (City, that is), Rabobank economists held a news briefing last Friday that suggested the world and U.S. economies are rebounding. That’s good news as the world’s consumers transition from their enforced frugality of 2009 back to more and better consumption in 2010. “The worst appears to be over, and we’re unlikely to return to pre-recession spending patterns through 2010,” says Steve Rannekleiv who specializes in the food retail sector for Rabobank.
 

“As the domestic and global dairy economies begin to show signs of life in the latter stages of 2009 and into 2010, dairy demand growth has the potential to tip the fine balance between demand and severely constricted supply, which could lead to much higher farm-gate milk prices….” Rabobank also reports in its 2010 Outlook publication.
 

Rabobank cautions, however, continued volatility in global economies and energy markets is also a threat. Use of risk management tools, which worked well for those who employed them in 2009, will be critical.
 

On the feed side, Rabobank economists are predicting corn prices will return to the $4/bu. level, thanks to the resurgence in both ethanol (due to higher oil prices) and corn exports. But a large Brazilian soybean crop means soybeans could dip to $9/bu. or less in 2010.  And if Congress fails to re-enact the energy tax credit for biodiesel, an additional 165 million bushels of beans could be freed up for feed as well.
 

So that’s the mostly good news from here, just east of Garrison Keillor’s Lake Wobegone. Happy Holidays to all!
 

—Jim Dickrell is editor of Dairy Today. You can reach him via e-mail at jdickrell@farmjournal.com.

This column is part of the Dairy Today eUpdate newsletter, which is delivered to subscribers biweekly and includes dairy industry analysis, dairy nutrition information as well as the latest dairy headline news. Click here to sign up.

 

Cows Coming Home to the Midwest

Dec 08, 2009

Note: We apologize for the confusion. If you are coming to this from the Dairy Today eUpdate, the Dairy Talk column in the newsletter was from December 2008 (Will Lower Feed Prices Be Enough). It has now been updated with the Jim's current topic "Cows Coming Home to the Midwest."

By Jim Dickrell

When you’re in the midst of a raging forest fire, it’s difficult to lose track of what’s going on in the rest of woods.  

John Kaczor, with California’s Milk Producers Council, provided one of those “duh” moments last week in his weekly column. He points out that Midwestern milk production—when you count Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan as one region--has now equaled the production of the Western production of California and Arizona.

A year ago, this Western production was running 315 million lb./month higher (8.5%) than the Midwest. Since then, 98,000 have left California and Arizona (largely thanks to the Cooperative Working Together program, sub-$10 milk in California, and historically high feed prices). Meanwhile, the Midwest has added 10,000 cows over the last year (and 19,000) over the past two.

Why the Midwest Renaissance? Anecdotal evidence from Michigan suggests part of the cow number surge is the result of the loss of BST. When co-ops there banned BST several years ago, some Michigan producers added cows to maintain milk volumes.

The story is different in Wisconsin and Minnesota. In these two old “M-W” price series states, entrepreneurial producers have learned how to milk cows in freestalls and parlors, and large foot-print, cross-vent barns are now becoming the facilities of choice. These new barns, with some housing 3,000 cows (some are even 2X that size) allow M-W producers the best of both worlds—warm housing in the winter; cooler housing in the summer. This has allowed milk production to go on unabated through -20°F weeks in January and +90°, 70% humidity weeks in July and August. 

In fact, in the midst of the dairy price crisis last summer, three Wisconsin facilities housing some 12,000 cows came on-line. The facilities had been planned 12 to 18 months earlier, financing has been secured, and Wisconsin processing facilities still had available capacity to take the milk.

Kaczor, in his column, rightly questioned whether the present push to the Midwest will continue. After all, California plants once again have available capacity. But the carnage wreaked by $150/cow/month losses in the Golden State will take some time to correct. Environmental challenges, both water and air, won’t be any less. And having been stung hard by the Great Recession, one has to wonder how much stomach California producers have to expand. 

In any event, the Midwest is proving it can compete with the boys out West. The I-29 corridor in particular—eastern South Dakota, northwest Iowa and western Minnesota--is proving to be an ideal milk producing area. There is lots of open space, plenty of feed and ethanol by-products, and a growing culture that’s starting to realize cows are good for local economies and the environment.  

With new investment in large-scale processing plants and re-investment in existing facilities, the Midwest is regaining its competitive advantage in feeding the eastern half of the United States. And with the right kind of regulatory reform, it could become a global competitor as well. In whey protein markets, it already has.

—Jim Dickrell is editor of Dairy Today. You can reach him via e-mail at jdickrell@farmjournal.com.

This column is part of the Dairy Today eUpdate newsletter, which is delivered to subscribers biweekly and includes dairy industry analysis, dairy nutrition information as well as the latest dairy headline news. Click here to sign up .

 

Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive Dairy Today's eUpdate today!

 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions