Sep 20, 2014
Home| Tools| Events| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin

Outlook Today

RSS By: Bob Utterback, Farm Journal

Bob Utterback has more than 26 years of experience and offers producers a disciplined approach to marketing.

Crude Oil, demand and what this means for agriculture!

Jul 01, 2008
I just heard a new phrase in reference to crude oil, it is in a “demand destruction phrase”.  Everybody is talking about the Energy Information Administration International Energy Outlook 2008 report released last week (please note that we sent it out to all our internet clients and it is at our web site).  The highlight stated: “World market energy consumption is projected to increase by 50% (yes, that’s doubling demand from 2005 through 2030). Total energy demand in the non-OEC countries increased by 85%, compared with an increase of 19% in the OECD countries.
Implications: Even if the U.S. becomes very aggressive on conservation, the demand explosion in Asia is going to keep prices high for energy, which is where the term demand destruction comes into play. As a nation that consumes 25% or higher of the world energy supply, there are many in the world that would now suggest this is unfair and must be changed. If we don’t watch out, the standard of living in the U.S. is going to go on a multiple year decline! This I believe is the overriding No. 1 issue for this year’s election. If you don’t have a strong economy that creates jobs, you can’t hope to improve the lives of your citizens. It’s simple, no money, no play!
In regards to agriculture, this energy outlook must be considered positive to the ethanol production sector. If you combine this with world population growth it does suggest the demand outlook for agriculture is very bullish. My belief follows the following line of thinking. You only have demand if people can afford to pay for it. This is going to be the future problem for all world governments as energy costs go up, it’s a hidden tax on consumers disposable income. Eventually, it will lead to slower growth. If you dove tail this with a restrictive energy policy and higher taxes to pay for government transfer programs from the rich to the poor you set up a dangerous economic future for slower growth in income by rising cost. In the end you will move into a serious stagflation or worse we could be heading towards a economic downturn not seen since the early 30’s. Eventually, if the problem is not resolved I believe it will lead to a major military conflict over natural resources.
What to do?  I would suggest as a grain producer you need to be using the current incomes to help pay off debt rather than increase debt to avoid taxes.  Second, you need to focus on locking in the profit margins specifically for 2009 and 2010. Third, the most challenging, is we need to start rethinking how we produce our crops. The agricultural revolution of the 19th century and 20th century  has been based upon cheap oil. This is not the future we have in store for us,  which implies that every part of operations must be reviewed. Just because this is how we’ve done it in the past, there is no reason we must do it in the future. Today I’m asking questions. I will be looking forward to your comments in the future. I will try to react and even introduce in my daily comments as time permits.
Finally, this is our last comments prior to the 4th of July. Everybody here at UMS invites you to go out and celebrate the freedoms we have been given. Yes things are going to get rough ahead of us for the U.S. consumer but we must still recognize we are a lot better off than many other parts of the world.  Only by working together can we hope to improve our lot in life.
Give us a call at 1-800-832-1488 if you want to go over details or would like to read more daily recommendations regarding reownership or marketing strategies, email me at or

The recommendations and opinions contained herein are based upon information from sources believed to be reliable. However, that information may be incomplete and unverified. There are numerous factors that can affect the markets, which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of these recommendations. Those following these recommendations do so at their own risk. The firm and/or customers of the firm may take a position that may not be consistent with the recommendations herein. Any recommendation does not constitute an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any commodity interest. Commodity trading involves risks, and you should fully understand those risks before trading.
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (6 Comments)

I'm not a grain farmer, but do raise a few acres of corn for cattle feed. This subject was just brought up this morning between a neighbor and myself conerning raising beef cattle. I told her that we cannot continue doing things like we have been doing, that is fertizling every inch of our ground, to have the max number head of cattle we can run. I sincerely believe we must cross fence our land into smaller plots, lessen the number of cattle we run, and turn in on that step by step each fall and winter. You take the new fertilizer costs, diesel fuel, all equals to more machinery use. As everyone here has written, we must change from what we have been doing or else.
1:41 PM Jul 7th
farmers need to utilize alternative energy to produce their crops in order to produce efficiently. Biodiesel, ethanol and wind energy should be utilized on the farm where the new energy movement starts! I plan to invest in homemade biodiesel and a small wind turbine to keep my profit margin. Unlike the commodities market, these are margins you CAN control!
8:12 PM Jul 5th

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive Dairy Today's eUpdate today!

The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions