Jul 11, 2014
Sign UpLogin

Estimating U.S. Corn Yield: Where Should We Start?

May 17, 2012
harvested corn
  

By Scott Irwin and Darrel Good, University of Illinois

Courtesy of farmdocdaily
 

Are USDA's estimates for 2012 accurate? Take a look behind the numbers.

The magnitude of the U.S. average corn yield in 2012 will be one of the most important factors in determining the average price during the 2012-13 marketing year due to the relatively low level of carry-out from the current marketing year. Early in the season, yield expectations generally start with an analysis of the trend in historic yields and an extension of the trend into the current year. As the planting and growing season progress, yield expectations are modified by the timeliness of planting, weather developments, and USDA crop condition ratings. The USDA provides survey based yield estimates beginning in August.

Read a detailed discussion of the procedures used by the USDA to produce the survey estimates.

At this still early point in the growing season, corn yield forecasts focus on trend yield, which can be thought of as average improvement in yield over time due to improvements in plant genetics and production technology. Analysis of the trend in the U.S average corn yield would seem to be a straight-forward exercise, but there is in fact considerable variation in how that analysis is conducted. The calculation of the value of the 2012 average U.S. trend yield, for example, can vary depending on:

1) The form of the fitted trend (linear or non-linear),
2) The starting date for calculating the trend,
3) The ending date for calculating the trend, and
4) Whether any historic yields are excluded from the trend calculation.

Most analysts fit a linear trend to historic yields, but the starting date for calculating the trend varies depending on whether there has been a perceived change in the trend over time. Most common is the perception that average yields have been increasing more rapidly since sometime in the 1990s as compared to the two or three decades earlier. The perceived higher trend has been mostly attributed to the development and adoption of new plant genetics and/or traits. One of the difficulties of identifying trend shifts in the short term is the potential for other factors, such as extended periods of favorable or unfavorable weather, to impact yields for multiple years.

Sometimes a few historic yields are excluded from the trend analysis with the explanation that such yields were "outliers" that are not likely to re-occur in the future. For corn, candidates for exclusion are typically low yields associated with unique weather events (drought, flood, or freeze) or widespread disease. It is rarer for high yielding years to be eliminated from the analysis.

With this background, we can proceed to a discussion of alternative estimates of the 2012 U.S. corn trend yield. All calculations are based on actual yields without any adjustment for variation in weather conditions from year-to-year (unconditional yields). The first estimate was presented last week by the USDA in the May 10 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates report. It is important to emphasize that this estimate was not generated by a survey process. Instead, the report indicated that the forecast of the 2012 U.S. corn yield of 166 bu. was "based on the simple linear trend of the national average yield for 1990-2010 adjusted for planting progress." 

Notice that the calculation excludes 2011 from the analysis and simply extends the 1990 through 2010 trend two years to 2012. This results in a USDA trend yield calculation for 2012 of 164 bushels. The trend line is reproduced in Figure 1 (red line). It has a slope of 2.32, indicating that the trend increase in corn yields was 2.32 bu. per year from 1990 through 2010. The same report indicated that the 164 bu. trend yield forecast was increased 2 bu. to 166 bu. to reflect the rapid pace of planting and emergence this spring.
 

corn yields 0516

In its report, the USDA did not indicate why the trend calculation was started in 1990 or why 2011 was excluded from the trend analysis. While there is a legitimate argument about the initial year to use for trend estimation, dropping 2011, a low yield year, from the estimation is more than a little curious. This seemingly small deletion turns out to have a large impact on the trend yield estimate for 2012. Adding back in 2011 to the USDA sample lowers the 2012 trend yield estimate 2.6 bu. to 161.4 bu. per acre (black line in Figure 1). The estimate for 1990-2011 reflects a trend yield increase of 2.15 bu. per year.

To illustrate the impact of the starting date on the trend calculation, we also calculate the trend yield for 2012 based on the linear trend of actual average yields from 1960 through 2011. The longer time period reflects the view that a notable change in the U.S trend yield has not occurred since 1960. Based on that time period, the trend calculation for 2012 is 158.4 bushels, reflecting a long term trend yield increase of 1.86 bu. per year (magenta line in Figure 1).

So, what do we think is a reasonable starting point for estimating the U.S. average corn yield in 2012? As we discussed in a previous post, there is indeed evidence of a slight increase in corn trend yield in some areas of the country in recent years, but we cannot yet confirm an increase in the overall U.S. average trend yield. So, we begin with the long term trend estimated over 1960-2011. We then "de-trend" historic yields over 1960-2011 in terms of 2012 technology. Next, we drop 1988 (early extreme drought conditions) and 1993 (historic flooding in western Corn Belt) from the analysis based on the argument that these are extreme outliers unlikely to be repeated in 2012. Finally, we add 2 bu. per acre to reflect the potential impact of the timely planting of the 2012 crop.

tend planting 0516
 

The 50 de-trended yields are presented in Figure 2 after re-arranging the yields from lowest to highest. The average de-trended and planting date adjusted corn yield for those years is 161.4 bu. per acre (coincidentally, the same as the trend yield over 1990-2011). Of particular interest is the chance that yields will equal or exceed the recent USDA estimate of 166 bu. per acre. Our analysis indicates that the average yield would equal or exceed 166 bu. in only 16 of the 50 years, or about one-third of the time.

The seemingly arcane topic of corn trend yield estimation can have large market impacts in certain situations. 2012 is one of those situations. The USDA recently estimated the corn trend yield for 2012 (after adjusting for planting progress) at 166 bu. per acre. Our analysis, based on the long-term trend increase in U.S. average corn yields, is that a more reasonable estimate is 161.4 bu. per acre. Using the USDA estimate of 89.1 million harvested acres of corn in 2012, the difference in the two yield estimates represents over 400 million bushels. Furthermore, our analysis indicates there is only about a one in three chance that the U.S. average yield in 2012 will equal or exceed 166 bu. per acre. The USDA estimated yield is likely to require favorable summer weather consisting of below average temperatures and above average rainfall in the main producing areas.

See Comments

RELATED TOPICS: Corn, Marketing, USDA, Analysis

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (2 Comments)

PullMyFinger - Chappell, NE
I know where to start - layoffs at USDA. Many, many layoffs.
8:49 PM May 17th
 
WhyMeJake
Wow, go figure. Why would the USDA drop 2011 out of the calculation? Let's see, incredibly lower yield which make their carryover numbers somewhat suspect and upsets the trend which they would like to see ever upward.

To what end, you ask? Cheap commodity prices. The whole existence of the this branch of government is to keep low prices for the farmers to the benefit of big business. How many years has anyone seen them predict anything less than bin-busting yields? When was there ever a forecast of the lowest yields in many years?

Not many farmers put much stock in any of their reports. Not the farmers friend, that's for sure. I can't remember a report that my neighbors thought was either correct or beneficial.

Did any farmer quickly sell off their crop? Not hardly. But every time the market starts getting over $6.25 or so, it seems like we need another report to lower that price. Even the Chinese are no longer amused. How can anyone predict a price off such numbers.

Last year's crop so very few corn piles on the ground around our area. Compare that to normal years with mountains of canvas-covered piles in every town. It would have to be a very gullible farmer who believed the stocks and carryover numbers. And now another bumper crop? The reports are so predictable they're laughable.

This is probably one of the best articles I've read on this subject. Pointing out the questionable basis for the report? Outstanding. Great article. Thanks.
6:52 PM May 17th
 



Name:

Comments:

Hot Links & Cool Tools

    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  

facebook twitter youtube View More>>
 
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions