Jul 26, 2014
Sign UpLogin

Timing Is the Secret

December 8, 2010
By: Darrell Smith, Farm Journal Conservation and Machinery Editor
 
 

FJ 052 F10460Shifting nitrogen fertilizer applications to later in the growing season pays off in higher yields as well as more efficient fertilizer use, according to a study by a Dumas, Texas, crop consultant.

David Reinart compiled data from 781 corn fields for 11 years. He and his partner, Chris Cogburn, consult for about 25 growers as a sideline to their full-time jobs—Reinart with Wilbur-Ellis Company and Cogburn with National Sorghum Producers. Their company is called Better Harvest.

Because Reinart’s clients irrigate, they can feed UAN (urea-ammonium nitrate) solution through their center-pivot systems all season long. Although conditions vary around the U.S., the principle of spoon-feeding nitrogen as late as possible applies to dryland farmers, too. (See “Adjust Nitrogen Principles to Your Environment,” page 50.)

The numbers tell all. Farmers who applied most of their nitrogen before planting averaged yields of 208 bu. per acre during the 11 years. They applied almost 1.2 lb. of nitrogen per bushel of corn produced. However, those who spoon-fed nitrogen through their center-pivot irrigation system, with the application extending through pollination, averaged yields of 225 bu. per acre. They applied less than 0.8 lb. of nitrogen per bushel of corn.

In addition to the economic benefits of higher yields, spoon-feeding has positive environmental implications. The less nitrogen fertilizer applied (and the closer to time of usage by plants), the less chance there is of unused nutrients finding their way into water supplies. Leaching is less of a risk in the arid Texas Panhandle, with 17" of annual rainfall, but it’s a concern in higher-rainfall areas.

“The total amount of nitrogen we apply does not increase,” Reinart points out. “The study does not suggest applying more nitrogen than you otherwise would. We just apply less of it preplant and more of it late in the season. In fact, other studies we have done show that if you apply too much nitrogen, corn yield will decline.”

Maximizing nitrogen efficiency hinges on knowing your soil conditions and flexing your nutrient application plans based on various factors. Reinart’s preplant soil test, in addition to residue cover, organic matter content and whether manure was applied, determines how much nitrogen a client will apply before planting.

“Whether to apply any preplant nitrogen at all depends on the individual field,” Reinart says. “But we never apply more than 100 lb. per acre.”

Midseason adjustments. In-season tests reveal how much nitrogen is already available for the crop, preventing excessive application. Reinart also adjusts each client’s recommendation based on soil and plant tissue tests and growing conditions.

At the four-leaf stage, Reinart analyzes soil and plant tissue for nitrogen, then formulates a nitrogen recommendation for the rest of the season. “Whatever the nitrogen recommendation at the four-leaf tissue testing, we always recommend applying at least 70 lb. of it after pollination,” he says.

In an ideal program, Reinart also pulls soil and tissue tests at tasselling and again adjusts his nitrogen recommendation. “If the corn is doing well, by the time it gets to tasselling it will have used more nitrogen, so soil levels will be lower,” he says. “That warrants an increased late-season nitrogen application if the remainder of the growing season will be favorable.”

Midseason rate adjustments have a big impact on nitrogen efficiency. “In 2004, a very good growing season, my average nitrogen recommendation at tasselling was 63 lb. per acre,” Reinart says. “My grower’s fields averaged 236 bu. per acre. In 2005, a hot, dry season, my average recommendation after tasselling was only 15 lb. per acre, and my growers averaged 202 bu. per acre. More nitrogen wouldn’t have done any good because we didn’t have the growing conditions to maximize yield.”

For Dumas farmer Harold Grall, using this spoon-feeding program gives him the flexibility to cut back on nitrogen rate if the corn gets damaged by hail, other weather events occur or the crop loses yield potential in any way.

Harvesttime test. For growers who request it, Reinart will test soil and plant tissue at harvest as well. In his low-rainfall area, a fall nitrate test usually provides a reliable indication of how much nitrogen will be available next spring (unless the nitrogen gets tied up by bacteria decomposing the crop residue, another factor that Reinart keeps in mind).

The harvesttime tissue test reveals how effective the current year’s fertilizer recommendation was. “Iowa State University recommends 700 ppm [parts per million] to 2,000 ppm in the stalk at harvesttime,” Reinart says. “I’ve found that the best yields tend to occur in that range.”

On-farm impact. Dalhart, Texas, grower Will Allen has followed Reinart’s recommendations since 2003.

“In 2009, we averaged 0.84 lb. of applied nitrogen per bushel of corn,” he says. “That was one of my highest ratios, and it was because of weather conditions. My lowest application rates
during that period were 0.49 lb. and 0.59 lb. of applied nitrogen per bushel of corn. For the past six years, my average has been 0.62 lb. per bushel.

“Before I began working with David, my ratio was well over 1 lb. of nitrogen per bushel,” he adds.
Some of Allen’s fields also receive manure applications, which Reinart takes into account when formulating nitrogen recommendations.

Grall says Reinart’s program helped him keep nitrogen fertilizer expenditures under control even during recent years of high prices.

“We used to put down as much nitrogen as we could early and little or none after tasselling,” Grall says. “Now we apply very little nitrogen before planting and spoon-feed it through the season. Four or five years ago, we were applying 1.3 lb. or 1.4 lb. of nitrogen per bushel of corn. Now we are down to 0.8 to 0.9 lb. per bushel.”

When Grall, who uses strip-till and no-till, does apply nitrogen preplant, its purpose is to keep nitrogen available to young corn plants while the soil’s nitrogen supply is temporarily immobilized by bacteria decomposing high volumes of crop residue.

The amount of crop residue present on the field must be considered as well, Reinart notes. “I’ve sampled a field where 200 lb. per acre of nitrogen was tied up by bacteria decomposing
a high volume of residue,” he says. “Putting some starter nitrogen 2"x2" from the seed furrow would have carried the corn plants until the nitrogen was released.”

What if a grower plans for a late-season nitrogen application, but then doesn’t need to irrigate his crop? In the High Plains, that isn’t likely. However, there is a solution. “I’ve seen that happen once in 14 years,” Reinart says. “Growers still applied nitrogen through their pivots. They just increased the amount of nitrogen and reduced the amount of water.”

Because many of his clients’ harvest-time tissue tests still read higher than the ideal 700 ppm to 2,000 ppm of nitrate, Reinart expects them to become even more efficient with nitrogen as they fine-tune their programs. “The secret of nitrogen efficiency,” he says, “is in the timing.”


Adjust Nitrogen Principles to Your Environment

With nitrogen, there’s no one-size-fits-all management program, but the principles followed by David Reinart and his clients apply anywhere, says Farm Journal Field Agronomist Ken Ferrie.
“David has the right perspective, calibrating his nitrogen application rates to his environment, his rainfall patterns and seasonal weather trends,” Ferrie says.

“He understands that the ideal nitrogen rate is a moving target and you must adjust it based on soil nitrate tests, tissue tests, stalk nitrate tests, volume of crop residue and manure application. If you consider all those variables, you’ll wind up with a pretty sound nitrogen program,” Ferrie adds.

Climate requires changes in nitrogen management from one area to the next. “As you go north, you have more crop residue to deal with and more seasonal rainfall to take into account,” Ferrie says. “There also are differences in hybrids and maturity ranges. The longer the time from flowering to black layer, the more important it is to have nitrogen availability after tasselling.

“Applying some nitrogen later in the season, and adjusting the rate as the season requires, is a sound concept,” Ferrie continues. “But you can’t simply apply so many pounds of nitrogen after tasselling and let it go at that because you would run the risk of corn running out of nitrogen. By taking in-season soil and tissue tests and adjusting nitrogen rates, David makes sure corn never has a bad day.”

Just as in Reinart’s locality, irrigated corn growers in Ferrie’s region of central Illinois apply some of their nitrogen through irrigation systems. “In this area, the week of tasselling and the following week normally is the last time we get a yield response that pays for the fertilizer,” Ferrie says. “So applying nitrogen at that time is routine. However, good managers adjust the rate, if growing conditions require it.”

Although late-season application is more difficult for dryland growers, they can do the same thing, Ferrie adds. “Because of weather conditions in 2010, some fields ran out of nitrogen at tasselling time,” he says. “Some growers flew on their nitrogen fertilizer application, and it paid off in higher yield.”
 

See Comments

FEATURED IN: Farm Journal - December 2010

 
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

No comments have been posted



Name:

Comments:

Hot Links & Cool Tools

    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  

facebook twitter youtube View More>>
 
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions