Apr 23, 2014
Sign UpLogin


Out to Pasture

RSS By: Steve Cornett, Beef Today

Read the latest blog from Steve Cornett.

A Rustler’s Nightmare

Nov 11, 2011

The comment period is still open on animal traceability, and I’ve finally decided I’m for it. I’m all in. It has not been easy for me. I am distrustful of government programs. I would rather see it done by the industry. It could be. It won’t.

There are several reasons I think it will be worth the little bit of extra trouble and expense of individually tracking cattle. One is that it should allow the industry to do a better job of protecting ownership. I want to be required to put an EID button and a matching tattoo on every animal I own. I want it to be a requirement for me to sell cattle.

The rustlers and rascals among us would hate it.

Yes, yes, I know. Brands are all you think we need. Maybe where you live. Not where I live. I’m in Texas. You can register my brand in the adjoining county if you want to.

Jay O’Brien broached the topic during a panel at Texas Cattle Feeders Association convention a few days ago. He suggested that individual ID could serve like a Vehicle Identification Number on a vehicle. He wonders, as do I, why ag bankers aren’t pushing the concept. Here, from this morning's Amarillo Globe News, is a story with which I am a bit familiar, that offers a reason they should: Man gets 9 years for bank fraud.

By the reckoning of O’Brien and me, the Happy State Bank would still be happy if they had been able to access a national registry that showed the cattle they were loaning money against didn’t belong to the young man they were loaning money to. 

And, from earlier this week, is this one from USA Today with the same story we see every time cattle prices get high.  People steal cattle and sell them: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-11-09/livestock-theft/51136118/1?csp=34news.

It would be nice if cattle thieves could still be hanged, but I don’t see that coming back.  So what’s to keep a guy from backing a gooseneck up to my pens and loading, say, $10,000 worth of springing heifers? I mean that’s a pretty nice night’s wages.

If I had a “VIN” on each of them and buyers were required to keep those numbers. I’d have more protection AND a way to know where the cattle went.

I know lots of cattlemen disagree. But I don’t understand why.

Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (4 Comments)

TOM - KENNEWICK, WA
This is just another way to get taxed and regulated and you are so optimistic that you are proceeding in spite of experience.

They could care less about your $10,000 of stolen heifers, so long as the thief pays the taxes that they would have gotten out of you.

We already have brands and that is just another way to have more government/union employees (as you as much as admitted). What makes you think that this will somehow be different?

If you are worried about your heifers you can get a tracking chip put in them and/ or you can tattoo their ears right now make that your brand.

But you will rue the day you ever went along with what will surly be just one more big hassle with zero benefit.
There are a whole lot of easy ways to stop cattle theft starting with a better brand inspection process that includes pictures and a public record of pictures of who sold what in what state with what brand on them
11:06 PM Dec 9th
 
bb - NC
Sounds like a way to get taxed on your cattle per head and to control what you do.
9:52 PM Nov 16th
 

Hot Links & Cool Tools

    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  

facebook twitter youtube View More>>
 
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions