May 25, 2013
Home| Tools| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin

 


August 2009 Archive for MGEX Research

RSS By: Joe Victor, AgWeb.com

Joe Victor is a Business Development Specialist with Minneapolis Grain Exchange, Inc., where he monitors cash grain activity and cash grain opportunities. He provides marketing advice through this blog.

Not Since 1996

Aug 27, 2009
Allendale research data discovered not since 1996 has the percent dough stage for corn has been as delayed as it is at present. The present dough stage registers 57 for the 18 states which comprise 92% of the nations corn supply potential. This compares to a year earlier level of 66% and in 1996 when the percent dough stage for Aug 23 was 54.
The market is impressed with the current health of the crop with its 70% good to excellent rating vs year earlier level of 64% and may only assume the 2009 corn crop yield is gaining. Equally important is how the present trade is also very aware of the lag in corn maturity and any prospects for an early or even a normal frost/freeze event.
The trade is very much aware of how year earlier corn dough percent registered 66% and was lagging vs previous years, but was able to dodge a bullet with a later than usual fall with the majority of the crop escaping damage. What are the chances the 2009 US corn belt will have back to back later than usual frost/freeze event?
Allendale Inc discovered in 1996 the August USDA corn yield was estimated at 118.7 bushels per acre and yet even with historically low percent of dough stage, five months later the January annual yield registered 127.1 bushels per acre. How could the percent lag in corn maturity in 1996 find a greater yield per acre? The answer is 1996 was able to dodge the proverbial frost/freeze bullet with a later than usual date. 2004 was yet another year when despite a lag in maturity, the January yield was better than the prior August yield. It is also interesting to note of the 15 previous crop years, 60% of the time, the January yield has been better than its prior August yield estimate. However it is also interesting to note of the most recent three crop years, the January annual report held a smaller yield per acre than its prior August yield.
The 1996 pod set for soybeans registered 80% compared to this years second lowest level of 85%. Unlike corn, the January annual yield estimate provided by USDA was 35.8 bushels per acre, vs 36.3 bpa in the prior August estimate. It may be surprising how in both 1996 and 2008 when there was a lag in soybean maturity, the January annual yield came in a half a bushel less than the prior August report. Of the past 15 years the January annual yield estimate has been higher 40% of the time vs 60% for the corn.
Lastly comes the keystone between success or failure for the 2009 corn and soybean crop and that is the prospects for an earlier than normal frost/freeze. The vast majority of the private weather services we use are not willing to “officially” forecast odds for the event but most will explain, the vast majority of the crop to have somewhat below normal amounts of growing degree units as a result of the cooler than average year. For nearly a month Allendale Inc has been recommending the accumulation of long risk management October options as an insurance policy against lagging maturity and cooler than average weather trends.
What are your thoughts, which crop is a greater risk for a normal frost/freeze? Does the high percentage of good to excellent crop rating automatically imply larger yields? Do you believe your crop will escape a normal frost/freeze? What measures are you taking to help offset the potential yield loss of a normal frost freeze?
 
We welcome your questions and comments.........Joe Victor
 
Allendale Inc welcomes any questions you may have by calling 800-551-4626 or
 
 
 
 
The thoughts expressed and the basic data from which they are drawn are believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Simulated results do not represent actual trading. Simulated trading programs are subject to the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Commodity trading may not be suitable for recipients of this publication. This is not a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any commodities. Those acting on this information are responsible for their own actions. Any republication, or other use of this information and thoughts expressed herein without the written permission of Allendale, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Allendale Inc. c2009

China Adds Another

Aug 21, 2009
News out of China reports China National Cereals, Oils & Foodstuffs Corporation (COFCO) has laid plans to erect its second largest soybean processing plant in the country’s southwest region. The company’s second largest plant is expected to begin construction in the month of September and once complete will have annual capacity of 1.2 million tonnes (44 million bushels). Interesting enough is the location, away from the country’s major soybean production region and nearer port facilities but equally interesting is how competitors of COFCO, both Sino Grain and Jilin Grain Group are also laying plans to open “new” facilities.
Allendale research data estimates annual per capita vegoil consumption for China of 37.7 pounds for 2009/10 and most definitely trend building from levels of 32.6 pounds in 2005 suggesting annual rate of growth of 3.12%. Of equal importance is the flavor of choice by Chinese consumers to overwhelmingly prefer soybean oil over palm oil by 67% for 2009/10 vs 47% in 2005/06 based on annual consumption data. Soybean oil consumption is the largest within China and holds a 2:1 ratio edge over rapeseed oil and 2.57:1 edge over palm oil suggesting the divergence between soyoil consumption and the lesser two continues to widen. China’s vegoil consumption is most definitely encouraging to soybean exporting countries as China’s annual soybean consumption is 3.46 times greater than production while wheat, rice and corn production is marginally higher than consumption.
The second most populated country, India with its 1.168 billion populous has a steady trend increase in its vegoil per capita consumption since 2006/07 and most definitely is making a major move for the 2009/10 marketing year with its record 25.6 pounds per person vs the previous year of 24.8 pounds per person. It is interesting to note the growth rate from 2007/08 to 2008/09 was a large 6% while 2008/09 to 2009/10 (3.2%) resembles China growth rate. Allendale Inc suggest although India’s per capita consumption is 47% less than China, it appears as though India is making a notable dietary move towards vegoils. We need to point out only India corn production is typically notably larger than consumption on a year by year basis and for most other key starch and vegoil crops close between production and consumption.
If China as well as India are to continue its westernization especially in the food diet arena and ultimately attempt to achieve the per capita consumption rate of vegoils which the United States enjoys, well quite frankly, they both have their work cut out for them as detailed within the graphic. Projected per capita vegoil consumption for the United States is 83.7 pounds, vs China’s 37.7 pounds and India’s 25.6 pounds. The bottom-line is the US should be very encouraged by the per capita growth trends of vegoil consumption within China and India and very encouraged China is trying to answer demand with the construction of its new soybean crush facilities.
What are your thoughts, is the USDA low in its 2009/10 China soybean imports of 38.1 million metric tonnes vs 39.1 MMT in 2008/09 and 37.82 MMT in 2007/08? If China and India are to continue its trend increase in vegoil consumption, will they attempt to become more self sufficient or rely upon major soybean producing countries? What short and longer term impact could China’s plans have on soybean prices?...............Joe Victor
 
Allendale Inc welcomes any questions you may have by calling 800-551-4626 or
e-mail    research@allendale-inc.com
  
 
The thoughts expressed and the basic data from which they are drawn are believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Simulated results do not represent actual trading. Simulated trading programs are subject to the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Commodity trading may not be suitable for recipients of this publication. This is not a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any commodities. Those acting on this information are responsible for their own actions. Any republication, or other use of this information and thoughts expressed herein without the written permission of Allendale, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Allendale Inc. c2009

Grain Supply Extremes

Aug 13, 2009
Now that the USDA August WASDE and crop production reports are past and answers have been provided with regards to 2009 acres planted, potentially harvested and current yield expectations, Allendale Inc can shed more light on the present starch vs oilseed imbalance.
It’s very interesting to see how the present research data implies the 2009-10 days supply of corn numbers 46 in size which is equal to the days supply in the 2007-08 market year. The corn supply is just more than a week greater than the rice supply of 38 days. The number of days supply of corn after all demand is met continues to trek in a sideways pattern, rice continues in its downward slope since the 2005-06 market year while wheat sky rockets from its historic low of just 48 days in the 2007-08 time period when all three key starches congregated at extreme lows.
The build of the number of days of supply of wheat has corrected from an extreme low of 48 days just two years ago to a present level of 122 days approaching cushions the US has not experienced nearly a decade ago. Allendale suggest wheat days supply of more than four months is the dark gray cloud which hangs over the corn and rice futures and cash markets potential.
Just as plump is the present day’s supply of wheat, the day’s supply of soybeans remains anemic at best. As you are able to view via the graph, present days supply of old crop remains at less than a two week supply and even though USDA suggest the 2009-10 soybean production at a record large 3.199 billion bushels, after demand is stripped out it leaves us with less than a doubling of days of supply of 25 which mirrors 2007-08 and is a week less than the ten year average. It is interesting to note the days supply of world soybeans numbers just one day more than the ten year average of fifty nine, predicated Brazil and Argentina come through with more typical crops correcting from last years dry weather.
The next two months will likely help solidify just how corn, soybeans and rice crop production develops barring any major weather impact. Spread traders be alert to the present tightness in the number of days supply vs more than ample counterparts.
What are your thoughts with reference to the present situation of the day’s supply of corn, rice, wheat and soybeans? Does the USDA have an accurate estimate of forthcoming supply and demand for
2009-10? What will it take to remove the more than adequate supply of wheat in order to take price pressure off of corn? We welcome your questions.........Joe Victor
 
 
Allendale Inc welcomes any questions you may have by calling 800-551-4626 or
 
 
 
The thoughts expressed and the basic data from which they are drawn are believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Simulated results do not represent actual trading. Simulated trading programs are subject to the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Commodity trading may not be suitable for recipients of this publication. This is not a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any commodities. Those acting on this information are responsible for their own actions. Any republication, or other use of this information and thoughts expressed herein without the written permission of Allendale, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Allendale Inc. c2009

Corn Maturity & Influence on Yield:

Aug 06, 2009
The present 2009 corn crop is in very select company in many ways as the industry awaits USDA’s additional acreage data results due to be released within its August 12th crop production report. While the trade focuses on the likelihood of an acreage decrease in corn and a yield per acre increase resulting in larger end stocks, we must not lose sight of the lagging maturity for the 2009 corn crop.
Although the 2009 corn crop is unique with regards to the special acreage data collection and the fact the present good to excellent conditions as of 8-2-09 are 68% vs year earlier level of 66% and five year average of 61%, there is little to dispute the crop is in better than average health as it enters the down slope of the reproductive phase or more commonly referred to as the silking phase.
It is the percent silk where Allendale Inc’s research discovers just how unique this years corn crop is in relation to past years. As of Aug 2, 2009, this years corn percent silk registers 76%. Over the most recent fourteen years there are four other years when the percent silk is near the same level but it must be noted there is only one other year of the fourteen when the percent silk was under 80%. By comparison, the fourteen year average for the percent silk is 89%, a full thirteen percent higher than the present 76%. Allendale Inc looked at is there a connection between the percent silk and how the national yield per acre evolves via USDA crop production reports between the month of July to the January Annual? As you are able to view the graph, of the four years which were close to this years percent silk, the January annual USDA report had two years, when the bushel per acre yield was higher than the July crop production report and two years when the January annual yield was less.
More specifically the 1995 Jan annual yield was 5.2% less than the July estimate and in 1997 the yield was 3.1% less. In 1996 the January annual report the yield per acre was 3.3% higher than the July and in 2008 the yield was 3.7% higher than the July. Allendale Inc will note the only other year which had less than 80% of silk was 1996 and yet the January annual yield was higher than July but of great importance is how both 2008 and 1996 had later than average first freezes.
Implementing the percent change in yield for each year utilizing USDA’s present July supply demand estimates would result in the following end stocks vs the present USDA estimate of 1.55 billion bushels, 2008’s 3.7% yield increase suggest 2.006 billion bushels, 1996’s 3.3% yield increase suggest 1.957 billion bushels, 1997’s 3.1% yield decline suggest 1.164 billion bushels and 1995’s 5.2% yield per acre decline suggest end stocks of 908 million bushels.
To summarize, Allendale Inc fully anticipates USDA’s month of August WASDE is likely to decrease 2009 corn acres and anticipates an upward revision in the yield and result in end stocks which are similar to old crop levels. However based on the lagging maturity of this years corn crop, Allendale Inc must forewarn unless the major Midwest is to experience a second consecutive “late fall” this years corn yield is anything from made.
 What are your thoughts regarding these scenarios? Is the 2009 corn yield subject to a notable July vs January yield decline based on lagging maturity? Do you feel you have the appropriate amount of risk protection for your corn crop? We welcome your questions.........Joe Victor
 
Allendale Inc welcomes any questions you may have by calling 800-551-4626 or
 
 
 
The thoughts expressed and the basic data from which they are drawn are believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Simulated results do not represent actual trading. Simulated trading programs are subject to the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. Commodity trading may not be suitable for recipients of this publication. This is not a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any commodities. Those acting on this information are responsible for their own actions. Any republication, or other use of this information and thoughts expressed herein without the written permission of Allendale, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Allendale Inc. c2009
Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive Top Producer's eNewsletter today!

 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2013 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions