Apr 19, 2014
Home| Tools| Blogs| Discussions| Sign UpLogin


The Truth about Trade

RSS By: Dean Kleckner, AgWeb.com

Dean is Chairman Emeritus of 'Truth About Trade & Technology, a nonprofit advocacy group led by a volunteer board of American farmers.

Kenyan Farmer to California Voters: Your vote on Prop 37 will impact me

Oct 18, 2012

 By Gilbert arap Bor: Kapseret, Kenya

 

When the United States votes on November 6, many Kenyans will want to see if Americans will re-elect President Obama, with whom we share a kinship through his Kenyan father.

 

Yet there’s another election that matters even more to us--not just as Kenyans, but as Africans who live on a hungry continent, where food insecurity poses a daily threat.

 

Nobody outside California can vote on Proposition 37, a ballot initiative that would require labels for many types of food that contain genetically modified (GM) ingredients. If it passes, however, Proposition 37 will hurt global efforts to improve food production through modern technology.

 

Advocates of the proposal say that consumers have a right to know what they’re eating. That’s true enough, and the U.S. federal government already requires clear and comprehensive nutritional information to appear on food packages. The American Medical Association says that there is no scientific justification for adding additional details about biotech ingredients. It would simply confuse grocery-store shoppers, who might worry that such food presents a health risk.

 

Nothing could be further from the truth. Over the last 15 years, farmers around the world have grown more than 3 billion acres of GM crops. No credible scientific evidence has shown food with GM ingredients to have caused as much as a sneeze, let alone actual harm. GM crops are perfectly safe.

 

Farmers plant GM crops because they’re better than traditional varieties: They grow more food on less land, need fewer herbicides and pesticides, and fight soil erosion because they reduce tillage. They are models of economic and environmental sustainability.

 

They’re also essential to feeding the planet. Demographers say that by 2050, global food production must double. The only way to meet this goal is through innovation. Just as farmers throughout history have crossbred plants to create new crops, we must now deploy the modern tools of biotechnology to coax higher yields from existing agricultural land.

 

The good news is that many nations already have embraced GM farming. In the United States, Canada, Argentina, and Brazil, the vast majority of corn and soybeans are the products of biotechnology. They’re no longer cutting-edge crops, but utterly conventional. People eat food with GM ingredients every day.

 

Yet in many poor countries--and especially in sub-Saharan Africa--biotechnology has spread slowly. Anti-globalization activists have crusaded against them, wrongly insisting that old-fashioned farming practices are adequate in the 21st century. Tellingly, few of these protestors have backgrounds in either farming or the science of crop biotechnology.

 

When it comes to food production, farmers know best. Here in Kenya, our access to biotech crops is limited--but we’re about to make significant progress, with the government’s imminent release of GM corn (maize) seed. It will help us feed a growing population.

 

The passage of Proposition 37, however, would undermine food security--right away in California, and very soon everywhere.

 

One study says that if Proposition 37 wins approval, the annual food costs of the average California family will rise by $350. That’s because the law’s complicated requirements would force food companies to alter their methods of packaging and production.

 

Yet Proposition 37 would carry an even higher price tag outside the borders of California. It would cast suspicion on a vital technology. Labels will stigmatize GM food, and companies that perform research and development into biotech agriculture will start to have second thoughts. If poor political choices can trump sound science, they may begin to invest their resources in other areas.

 

Africa has a rooting interest in these developments. Not only do we want basic varieties of GM corn, but we hope to have access to other kinds of GM crops plus different types of GM traits, such as drought resistance. This is the key to my continent’s ability to feed itself.

 

Thomas Friedman reminds us that the world is flat: We live in a global village, where legal and scientific events that occur in one place quickly reverberate in the four corners of the earth. Political decisions in California will soon catch up with farmers everywhere, from Honduras to India to my little 25-acre farming plot in western Kenya.

 

Let’s hope that on Election Day, Californians vote locally and think globally.

 

Gilbert Arap Bor grows corn (maize), vegetables and dairy cows on a small-scale farm of 25 acres in Kapseret, near Eldoret, Kenya.  He also teaches at the Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Eldoret campus.  Mr. Bor is the 2011 Kleckner Trade & Technology Advancement Award recipient and a member of the Truth About Trade & Technology Global Farmer Network.By Gilbert arap Bor: Kapseret, Kenya

 

When the United States votes on November 6, many Kenyans will want to see if Americans will re-elect President Obama, with whom we share a kinship through his Kenyan father.

 

Yet there’s another election that matters even more to us--not just as Kenyans, but as Africans who live on a hungry continent, where food insecurity poses a daily threat.

 

Nobody outside California can vote on Proposition 37, a ballot initiative that would require labels for many types of food that contain genetically modified (GM) ingredients. If it passes, however, Proposition 37 will hurt global efforts to improve food production through modern technology.

 

Advocates of the proposal say that consumers have a right to know what they’re eating. That’s true enough, and the U.S. federal government already requires clear and comprehensive nutritional information to appear on food packages. The American Medical Association says that there is no scientific justification for adding additional details about biotech ingredients. It would simply confuse grocery-store shoppers, who might worry that such food presents a health risk.

 

Nothing could be further from the truth. Over the last 15 years, farmers around the world have grown more than 3 billion acres of GM crops. No credible scientific evidence has shown food with GM ingredients to have caused as much as a sneeze, let alone actual harm. GM crops are perfectly safe.

 

Farmers plant GM crops because they’re better than traditional varieties: They grow more food on less land, need fewer herbicides and pesticides, and fight soil erosion because they reduce tillage. They are models of economic and environmental sustainability.

 

They’re also essential to feeding the planet. Demographers say that by 2050, global food production must double. The only way to meet this goal is through innovation. Just as farmers throughout history have crossbred plants to create new crops, we must now deploy the modern tools of biotechnology to coax higher yields from existing agricultural land.

 

The good news is that many nations already have embraced GM farming. In the United States, Canada, Argentina, and Brazil, the vast majority of corn and soybeans are the products of biotechnology. They’re no longer cutting-edge crops, but utterly conventional. People eat food with GM ingredients every day.

 

Yet in many poor countries--and especially in sub-Saharan Africa--biotechnology has spread slowly. Anti-globalization activists have crusaded against them, wrongly insisting that old-fashioned farming practices are adequate in the 21st century. Tellingly, few of these protestors have backgrounds in either farming or the science of crop biotechnology.

 

When it comes to food production, farmers know best. Here in Kenya, our access to biotech crops is limited--but we’re about to make significant progress, with the government’s imminent release of GM corn (maize) seed. It will help us feed a growing population.

 

The passage of Proposition 37, however, would undermine food security--right away in California, and very soon everywhere.

 

One study says that if Proposition 37 wins approval, the annual food costs of the average California family will rise by $350. That’s because the law’s complicated requirements would force food companies to alter their methods of packaging and production.

 

Yet Proposition 37 would carry an even higher price tag outside the borders of California. It would cast suspicion on a vital technology. Labels will stigmatize GM food, and companies that perform research and development into biotech agriculture will start to have second thoughts. If poor political choices can trump sound science, they may begin to invest their resources in other areas.

 

Africa has a rooting interest in these developments. Not only do we want basic varieties of GM corn, but we hope to have access to other kinds of GM crops plus different types of GM traits, such as drought resistance. This is the key to my continent’s ability to feed itself.

 

Thomas Friedman reminds us that the world is flat: We live in a global village, where legal and scientific events that occur in one place quickly reverberate in the four corners of the earth. Political decisions in California will soon catch up with farmers everywhere, from Honduras to India to my little 25-acre farming plot in western Kenya.

 

Let’s hope that on Election Day, Californians vote locally and think globally.

 

Gilbert Arap Bor grows corn (maize), vegetables and dairy cows on a small-scale farm of 25 acres in Kapseret, near Eldoret, Kenya.  He also teaches at the Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Eldoret campus.  Mr. Bor is the 2011 Kleckner Trade & Technology Advancement Award recipient and a member of the Truth About Trade & Technology Global Farmer Network.

Log In or Sign Up to comment

COMMENTS (2 Comments)

Ric Ohge - Belmond, IA
Let’s make a list of Links. You probably won’t read them, or if you do, you’ll decry the Science involved, but the point is, there’s a LOT more than “Press Releases” out there, AND much from Independent sources:
1. http://www.responsibletechnology.org/health-risks
2. http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/our-failing-food-system/genetic-engineering/environmental-effects-of.html
3. http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm
4. http://www.biotech-info.net/allergens.pdf
5. http://aaemonline.org/gmopost.html
6. http://www.soilassociation.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=SqDvBO1pyEU%3D&tabid=390
7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078015/
8. http://www.biosafety-info.net/file_dir/315324885a5d6ca2f5.pdf
These Links should be enough for a good start-but do your OWN Research. Regurgitating a “Party Line” will never win “converts”. Bio-Engineering IS a viable science, but one in it’s infancy. New research indicates that cellular processes are at work on a sub-nuclear scale, that magnetic fields are involved, that there is NO junk DNA/RNA (shouldn’t we know what the rest does? Current technology was founded on the premise that most of it was “left-over” junk from Evolution…), that even nano-particles can have their function altered by changing their shape, and that the lattice-like formations will “freeze” ions into their shape even after the DNA lattice is removed. There are no answers yet on how traits are “jumping” species, nor has even the Government weighed in on the effects of the much higher than normal Cesium levels in our soil. These are ALL things that “invite” the industry to step back, work on soil repair, and to do the exhaustive research needed to create a new generation of Biotechnology which fulfills our dreams, with out creating any nightmares. Crazy…huh?
10:55 AM Oct 19th
 
Ric Ohge - Belmond, IA
I demand to know what I pay for with my own money and only someone with something to hide would be concerned-get it?
10:50 AM Oct 19th
 

Receive the latest news, information and commentary customized for you. Sign up to receive Top Producer's eNewsletter today!

 
 
 
 
The Home Page of Agriculture
© 2014 Farm Journal, Inc. All Rights Reserved|Web site design and development by AmericanEagle.com|Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions