New Health Care Law Leaves Unanswered Questions

October 23, 2013 01:10 AM
New Health Care Law Leaves Unanswered Questions

Farmers might benefit from the new law, which goes into effect in January, but the costs remain unknown.

By Lekan Oguntoyinbo

In the past, insurance companies have rated farming as a high-risk occupation. As a result, farmers are disproportionately uninsured or underinsured, explains one expert.

The Affordable Care Act, which goes into effect in January, reduces the criteria health insurance issuers can use to rate consumers, says Roberta Riportella, Kansas Health Foundation professor of community health at Kansas State University. This new law could be of immense help to farmers, she says.

"You’ve had a lot of farm families where one person worked off the farm so they could get insurance for the family," Riportella explains. "Now they won’t be forced to get a job off the farm."

Here more from Riportella in this AgriTalk report:

Learn more

Find out more about how the new health care law will affect your farm at the 2014 Top Producer Seminar.

The new law prohibits insurance companies from rejecting individuals for pre-existing conditions.

"The no pre-existing condition is a positive benefit,"says Tim Mahaffey, executive director of the Farmers Health Cooperative of Wisconsin in Madison. However, he is concerned about the costs. "For those who don’t qualify for the small business tax subsidy (less than 25 employees), the cost could be high."

Moving Target

While the new law conveys several benefits, it could pose a host of financial challenges. Because the law is "a moving target" and is still being tweaked, experts and farm advocates say that it leaves many questions unanswered, such as how much will it cost farmers to cover themselves and their families if they try to buy insurance through the exchanges and whether farmers with more than 50 seasonal employees must extend coverage to them.

Greg Buckman, a fourth-generation farmer from Hallsville, Mo., who also sells health insurance, says most farmers he’s spoken with are uneasy about the new law because it is sure to lead to higher premiums.

He says the law forces insurance companies to pass on the costs to customers, particularly those who are healthy and haven’t had any difficulty getting insurance in the past. "I’d say 95% believe that Obamacare is a bad thing," says Buckman, who is also a regional vice president for the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association. "The 5% that do like it are the ones who can’t buy insurance."

Buckman pays $700 a month for a premium that covers him and two employees. The policy has a $6,000 deductible for each of them. As of December 2014, his monthly policy will increase by at least $250. He says another carrier has informed him that it plans to raise its rates by 32% next year.

Like the rest of the population, many farmers who live in states where there are a limited number of major carriers are concerned about being able to find affordable policies. There are also concerns that farm businesses that qualify for tax subsidies might see those subsidies eroded by exorbitant prices at the exchanges.

Wendy Fink-Weber, spokeswoman for the Western Growers Association, which represents about 2,500 farmers who grow labor intensive crops, says the new law presents a couple of overarching problems.

Seasonal Unknowns

First, these farmers hire scores of seasonal employees who receive limited forms of health insurance known as mini-med plans. The plans typically cover $50,000 or $100,000 of medical expenses, Fink-Weber says. "There are not a lot of deductibles," she says. "The workforce is healthy and a little younger than the general population."

Farmers are concerned about being able to afford the premiums if the new law requires them to buy more comprehensive forms of health insurance for their seasonal workers, she says. It’s estimated that 70% of seasonal employees are undocumented immigrants. Getting insurance for these employees would be impossible. "This has also given us the impetus to work on immigration reform," she says, adding that they are working to extend waivers to let them keep using these mini-med plans.

While it’s easy to question the unknown, observers are quick to tout other aspects of this law that could benefit farmers, such as tax subsidies for those who are income eligible. They note that it would also benefit farmers who are 50 and older. Mahaffey says some health insurance ratio rates for older to younger people are as high as 5:1. Under the law, the ratio cannot be higher than 3:1.

"As we’ve moved through the implementation, people are hopeful it will work, but they are apprehensive," says Pat Wolff, American Farm Bureau Federation senior director of congressional relations. "Employers are concerned about what they will have to do to comply with the law and what it will cost."

It’s these unknowns that trouble many. "We don’t know what the costs of premiums will be," Mahaffey says. "A farmer that has scaled back coverage and is now being forced to buy comprehensive coverage might be faced with sticker shock."


Back to news

AgTech Expo

Harness the power of AgTech

Farm Journal's AgTech Expo
Dec. 11 to 13 in Indianapolis, IN

Keynotes from: Google's Geospacial Technologist, Farm Journal Field Agronomist Ken Ferrie, and an expert in the Internet of Things. Plus 19 breakouts presented by independent industry experts. To learn more, click here.




Spell Check

10/23/2013 12:38 PM

  Informed my individual coverage plan is no longer legal. Premium going from $262 to $416, deductible from 2750 to 5000. It's ironic that my pregnancy will now be covered, so we can all feel good about the screwing we get from Obamacare. I'll be dropping my insurance come dec 14th. Thank You, Dear Reader, may I have another?

10/23/2013 12:38 PM

  Informed my individual coverage plan is no longer legal. Premium going from $262 to $416, deductible from 2750 to 5000. It's ironic that my pregnancy will now be covered, so we can all feel good about the screwing we get from Obamacare. I'll be dropping my insurance come dec 14th. Thank You, Dear Reader, may I have another?

10/23/2013 02:16 PM

  Those with medical reimbursement plans or plans that reimburse up to $x.xx of individual obtained policies will probably want to drop the plan and have the employee find coverage. Due to the heavy federal subsidies, the employee likely will find cheaper insurance through the Exchanges. If there is a medical reimbursement plan in place, or a reimbursement of up to $x.xx of premiums, the employee will NOT qualify to obtain subsidized insurance through the exchange. An individual with income below about $46,000 and a family of four with income below $94,000 qualify for subsidized premiums. The unintended consequence is the farmer will be dropping coverage for employees, and perhaps raising taxable income of employees instead.


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by
Brought to you by Beyer