5 Farm Bill Goals From AFBF

July 18, 2017 09:08 AM
Capitol flag

As preparations to develop the next farm bill continue, the American Farm Bureau Federation penned a letter to key congressional agricultural committee members spelling out its top priorities.

“These recommendations are not set in stone,” the letter reads in part. “Rather, they are designed to provide the necessary flexibility to ensure that Farm Bureau is prepared to work with you in achieving the best possible farm bill that meets our key farm policy objectives while assisting you in meeting the challenges this important legislation will endure.”

In the letter, AFBF proposes the following:

  1. Protect current farm bill spending.
  2. Maintain a unified farm bill that includes nutrition programs and farm programs together.
  3. Ensure any changes to current farm legislation be an amendment to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 or the Agricultural Act of 1949.
  4. Prioritize top funding concerns, including risk management tools such as federal crop insurance and Title 1 commodity programs.
  5. Ensure programs are complaint with World Trade Organization agreements.

The AFBF board also passed along a few farm policy recommendations based on these goals:

  • Let farmers choose the higher value – either the five-year Olympic Average yield for ARC-CO, or a simple 10-year average yield.
  • Increase the reference price used as a floor for ARC-CO by 5% for corn, soybeans, wheat, sorghum and other minor crops.
  • Designate cottonseed as an “other oilseed” so it is eligible for Title 1 commodity support programs, or support a cotton lint program.
  • Improve the Dairy margin Protection Program with a handful of new provisions.
  • Increase the annual cap on livestock insurance products from $20 million to $75 million.

AFBF president Zippy Duvall says U.S. farmers and ranchers need a strong farm bill now more than ever.

“Because of low commodity prices, many of America’s farmers and ranchers are struggling,” he says. “The risk management and safety net provisions of farm bills are most important in times like these.”

Back to news



Spell Check

Brad Wilson
Springville, IA
7/19/2017 10:00 AM

  The problem is that to "protect current farm bill spending" is to preserve what is about the worst farm bill ever. The 2014 bill offered much reduced subsidies, especially since ARC pays very little when prices go low and stay low, (which they are projected to do, and have usually done for decades). CBO projections have been showing this. And the PLC was inadequate for most crops as well, and disastrous for oats (for a sustainable crop rotation). Last time Farm Bureau called for those reduced subsidies (http://agpolicy.org/weekcol/584.html ). More importantly, all of this is a recipe for losing money on farm exports. We need adequately restored price floors instead of subsidies. Subsidies bring blame, a loss of clout, plus this time the risk is that tea party types will call for farm bill elimination. I predict a secret farm bill with fewer subsidies, with no votes until they can win. Farm state Republicans don't want to take a stand either for or against subsidies. The choice will be between reduced or no subsidies.


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer