About the Economy Trump is Inheriting...

December 29, 2016 10:06 AM
 
President Donald J. Trump

Research suggests factors beyond the control of any U.S. president, not their actual policies, set the course of the economy. Yet with voters, President-Elect Donald Trump will secure much of the praise or blame when it comes to the impact of his agenda over the next four years.

Here are six charts that illustrate the economy that Trump — who wants to focus on " jobs, jobs, jobs" — will inherit from President Barack Obama and how it compares with historical standards.

Gross domestic product is chugging along, growing at a 1.7 percent pace in the year through the third quarter. That's slower than what most prior administrations faced, and comes against a backdrop of weak global demand, aging demographics and tepid corporate investment. Trump has said he's aiming to achieve 3.5 to 4 percent average annual growth, even as real GDP expansion is projected to average just 2.2 percent next year and 2.3 percent in 2018, according to economists.

Non-farm payrolls in November came in at 178,000, the fourth-worst situation among the 10 incoming presidents included in this analysis, though still a massive improvement from the nearly 770,000 jobs lost around Election Day 2008. The 4.6 percent jobless rate in the same month puts Trump in a better situation than five of the previous six presidents — the exception being President George W. Bush, who won the election in 2000 when the unemployment rate was under 4 percent. 

Hourly earnings in November grew just 2.4 percent, lower than the similar wage growth figure posted for each of the previous seven presidents-elect analyzed.

The core inflation situation is getting close to the Federal Reserve's medium-term 2 percent goal, largely unchanged from the situation inherited by presidents Obama, George W. Bush, and even Bill Clinton. That said, the Fed focuses on headline inflation, which includes volatile fuel and food and is lower today, at just 1.4 percent.

U.S. industrial production fell by 0.6 percent in November. While not the 8.7 percent contraction Obama had to overcome, reversing this will be one of Trump's biggest challenges. 

Trump is also in a better position when it comes to the housing market, with roughly 1.1 million homes beginning construction this November versus 652,000 when Obama became president-elect in late 2008. Looking back since 1952, however, this is the second-lowest November release of any of the election years analyzed.

While today's economy is a mixed bag by historical standards, one thing is clear: Obama has left Trump a 2016 economy in a better state, by many measures, than when he was first elected president in 2008 in the middle of the worst downturn since the Great Depression.

This analysis was based on the latest available data from all sources.

(Fore more news and economic analysis, see Benchmark.)

To contact the author of this story: Andre Tartar in New York at atartar@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Josh Robinson at jrobinson37@bloomberg.net, Sarah McGregor

©2016 Bloomberg L.P.

Back to news


RELATED CONTENT

Comments

 
Spell Check

Ron Hovanec
Wooster, OH
1/2/2017 09:23 AM
 

  Bryan you forgot to mention that a lot of that debt was caused by legislation enacted before Obama became president. You can't blame the debt added from Jan 2009 to Sep 2009 to Obama because the budget was passed before he became president. The US debt the day the last Bush budget ended Sep 2009 was $12.8 trillion. It is estimated to be $19.5 trillion at the end of the last Obama budget. That is no where near doubling. Bryan you also forgot to mention how much the policies passed under Bush added to the debt. "If we break this down, we can see that the cost of Bush's policies amount to more than five times the cost of Obama's policies. The Bush tax cuts plus the costly Iraq and Afghanistan wars cost about 2.5 trillion dollars in debt. Also, the Bush administration overspending on defense cost another 1.2 trillion, which spiraled the debt out control. Let's now take a look at Obama's policies. Much of his spending has focused on the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, but even more has come from a combination of a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts and other mandatory spending. However, Obama's increased focus on deficit reduction has paid off significantly in the long run. Automatic spending cuts have reduced the deficit by $503 billion, and cuts to defense and Health Care have amounted to a total of about $400 bilion. Assuming the accuracy of this chart, we can conclude that: The cost of Bush's policies was $5.1 trillion, and the cost of Obama's policies was a mere $983 billion." https://www.quora.com/Who-created-more-debt-–-Bush-or-Obama Bryan you also ignored the context of the largest recession in history happening right before Obama took office.

 
 
Bryan Porter
Rockford, MI
12/31/2016 07:53 PM
 

  You forget to mention that the national debt has more than doubled under the Obama administration.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close