California Can Label Roundup as Possible Cancer Threat

March 15, 2017 01:30 PM
 
California Can Label Roundup as Possible Cancer Threat

California Superior Court Judge Kristi Culver Kapetan recently ruled California can require Monsanto to label Roundup as a possible cancer threat. Monsanto holds its position the chemical poses no such risk to humans.

California will list glyphosate in Proposition 65—a list of chemicals known to cause cancer. Monsanto fought the state on this matter but lost its case in court earlier this week. Roundup was added to Proposition 65 based on findings from a debated report by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2015 that labeled glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, as “probably carcinogenic.”

In California alone, Roundup is used on more than 250 crops. Monsanto officials say they are concerned this label will hurt sales and customer access to the product.

“Regulators around the world, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the state of California itself, have determined that glyphosate does not cause cancer,” says Christi Dixon, Monsanto corporate media relations lead. “The agency’s flawed and baseless proposal to list glyphosate under Proposition 65 not only contradicts California’s own scientific assessment, but it also violates the California and U.S. Constitutions. We disagree with the Court’s ruling, and we will continue to fight the decision on the basis of sound science and the law.”

In a separate announcement this week, the European Chemical’s Agency (ECHA) announced it finds glyphosate is not a carcinogen. This finding helps move the European Union forward in deciding whether or not to renew glyphosate’s approval later in 2017.

“ECHA’s finding that glyphosate is not a carcinogen throws further doubt on IARC’s process and conclusion,” the agency stated in a recent press release.

After ECHA’s findings today others have stepped forward with concerns about IARC’s testing process and accuracy.

“ECHA’s confirmation that glyphosate is not a carcinogen underscores the serious flaws in IARC’s evaluation of carcinogens,” noted the Campaign for Accuracy in Public Health Research in a recent statement. “IARC consistently fails to base its reviews on a full consideration of the available scientific evidence, which explains why regulatory bodies around the globe disagree with its determination that glyphosate is a ‘probable human carcinogen.’ Until IARC reforms its unscientific monograph process, its evaluations will continue to be out-of-step with the rest of the public health and regulatory community.”

If IARC’s findings are disproved, court documents indicate glyphosate can be removed from Proposition 65.

“If the glyphosate listing under Proposition 65 is invalidated, it will immediately remove the protection that the State considers necessary to public health and welfare,” those documents state.

Back to news


 

Comments

 
Spell Check

Carol Dutra
Hollister, CA
5/7/2017 02:50 PM
 

  The EFSA ('European food Safety Authority') used studies provided to them from the 'Glyphosate Task Force' (GTF) to assess Glyphosate as a human carcinogen. These studies both used by BfR and EFSA were PAID FOR scientific papers that Monsanto paid for. GTF, 'Glyphosate Task Force' IS Monsanto, Syngenta and other chemical companies. This has come out in the Monsanto cancer trial in SanFrancisco, thanks to the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) where emails and company documents were introduced into evidence during the 'discovery' portion of the trial. The IARC (International Agency For Research On Cancer) , got their information from dozens of studies done on the safety/carcinogenetic nature of Glyphosate by scientists around the World. The IARC has concluded that Glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans.

 
 
marie
Lincoln, NE
3/17/2017 01:34 PM
 

  Thank goodness for California

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close