COOL: Canada Seeks $3 Billion in Retaliation

June 5, 2015 11:30 AM
 
COOL: Canada Seeks $3 Billion in Retaliation

On Thursday, Canada and Mexico announced they’ll pursue authorization from the World Trade Organization (WTO) for retaliation against the U.S. for country of original labeling (COOL). Canada seeks $3 billion in retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, while Mexico targets $653 million in trade.

“Our government will continue to stand on the side of Canadian farmers and ranchers, and we will continue to protect all hardworking Canadians throughout this retaliatory process,” says Gerry Ritz, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food for Canada.

This all follows a May 18 WTO ruling against the U.S.’s COOL requirements. It was the fourth and final time the WTO ruled against COOL.

“We continue to call on the United States to repeal COOL, cease this harmful policy and restore our integrated North American supply chain to the benefit of businesses and workers on both sides of the border,” says Ed Fast, Minister of International Trade for Canada.

A hearing will be held on June 17 by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body to consider the retaliatory tariffs.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress is considering repealing COOL next week.

The House of Representatives will look at legislation that would repeal COOL requirements for beef, pork and poultry products.

If the bill passes it would move onto the Senate where Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts has already voiced a strong opinion against COOL. Senator Roberts has previously shared he believes that “full repeal” of COOL is the only way to prevent retaliation.

Back to news


 

RELATED CONTENT

Comments

 
Spell Check

Clay Kaiser
Geyser, MT
6/5/2015 11:21 PM
 

  Cool should be mandatory in all countries! The consumer should know where his food is grown. The W.T.O. Is clearly wrong on this ruling.

 
 
Craig
Kearney, NE
6/7/2015 12:49 PM
 

  How many $billions are American cattlemen due from Canada over the Canadian dairy cow from 2003 that was mistakenly identified as the U.S. "first" case of BSE? The ramifications of that mess is still affecting our beef exports. How sad that the NCBA and "Beef Today" do not push this real example of market harm, instead of focusing on the imaginary "harm" caused by COOL

 
 
Brian
Chicago, IL
6/8/2015 11:14 AM
 

  How about addressing Canada's 249% tariff on USA Cheese and dairy products.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close