Did Farmers Get a Better Deal With ARC/PLC?

June 19, 2017 12:22 PM
money matters

When the 2014 farm bill bumped the 2008 version, several changes occurred – most notably, eliminating Direct and Counter Cycle Payment (DCP) and Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) programs and replacing it with the Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) programs. How did farmers in different regions fare with these changes?

That question was recently asked by two agricultural economists, Brent Gloy and David Widmar, writing for the “Agricultural Economic Insights” website. They found some significant differences when looking at the state-level payments of ARC/PLC in 2015 and 2016  relative to direct fixed payments from 2010 to 2013.

Areas including the upper Midwest, eastern Corn Belt, Northeast and Southeast have seen relatively higher payments. However, Mid-Atlantic states, the Delta, Southwest and West fared relatively worse with the latest programs.

A state-by-state comparison of ARC/PLC versus prior direct fixed payments.

“Based on the map above, one can see why there are such large differences of opinion about the merits of the ARC/PLC program,” Gloy and Widmar note.

At the national level, ARC/PLC payments have made larger payments than the direct program payments that proceeded it. But as Gloy and Widmar  point out, “if you talk to many farmers, you will soon find out that payments for some producers have been relatively small.”

For 2017, ARC/PLC payments could rise to $8.6 billion, according to USDA-ERS.

“However, it is worth noting that this further increase is being driven by the rapid rise of payments under the PLC program, while payments under ARC continue to decline,” the economists note.

As work continues on developing the next farm bill, these insights will certainly continue to flavor the discussion, Gloy and Widmar conclude.

Back to news



Spell Check

Eastern, NE
6/19/2017 06:49 PM

  Haven't seen a payment yet under the 2014 farm bill. Might in October if it doesn't get "sequestered" away.

Kevin Dettler
Doland, SD
6/19/2017 06:45 PM

  Where do you get your figures. I'm farm in SD, where you show we got 157% of our direct payments. We got about 50% the last two years. Some of neighboring counties got less than 10% and one county got .10 that's ten cents per acre. Here's what we need as farmers. Not fictions payments, but a way to slow trendline on yields until markets develop to handle the excess production. It's bad enough that our trend lines have increased faster than our markets but our technology has gone around the world and made huge advances in their trend line yields. Frustrated in S Dakota!


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer