GMO Crops Still Tend to be All-or-Nothing Decision

March 8, 2016 10:52 AM
iowa corn pro farmer crop tour 2015

To GMO or not GMO: That is the question on many farmers' minds in 2016. The prospect of reduced input costs and potential for premium can be tantalizing, but is the risk of lower yields worth it?

Maybe it might be worth planting both.

According to a recent Farm Journal Pulse poll, most farmers are not necessarily taking that approach, at least not yet. More than 1,500 farmers responded to the question, “ What percent of your corn acres this year will be planted to non-GMO hybrids?” Four out of five respondents say they are in all the way – or not at all.

Farmers gave the most common response as planting zero non-GMO acres, with 71%. Another 10% say they’re planting every acre to non-GMO hybrids.

That leaves 19% of respondents who say they’re doing a bit of both. One in 10 respondents say they are setting aside a small amount of their acres (1-25%) to non-GMO varieties. Another 4% are planting up to half, with 3% going non-GMO on 51-75% of their acres and 2% with 76-99%.


Mike Preiner, vice president of product management at Granular, says there are five areas farmers should explore when deciding whether or not to plant non-GMO crops, and how much.

1. Assess potential higher premiums for non-GMO crops, which can range from $1 to $4 per bushel in soybean and $0.20 to $0.40 per bushel in corn.

“Rising demand is being met by an increased supply, so premiums are likely to stabilize or go down,” Preiner notes.

2. Determine cost savings of non-GMO seed, which can range from $10 to $15 per acre in corn and $40 to $60 in soybean.

3. Review operational cost differences – extra time and costs associated with special handling and other procedures can range from $15 to $30 per acre, Preiner says.

4. Also review input cost differences, which can vary quite a bit by location.

5. Last but not least, review yield potential based on local pest pressures, management practices and other environmental factors.

“Will non-GMO crops be more profitable for everyone? Of course not, especially given the recent downward trend of premiums,” Preiner concludes. Farmers need a take a comprehensive approach when making these decisions, he says.

Back to news




Spell Check

Windom, MN
3/9/2016 10:33 AM

  The suicide deaths in India are a myth. Those who planted go cotton got better yields and used fewer pesticides. How is that a cause for suicide.

Champaign , IL
3/10/2016 10:29 PM

  He has the savings per acre backwards. 10-15 for beans and 40-60 in corn

Whitehall, WI
3/9/2016 08:36 AM

  There's to much surplus right now anyway. My squirrels don't seem to eat the GMO grain.The well managed farm should do just fine.Yes a few less bushels,but less input also.


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by
Brought to you by Beyer