Mid-America Land Values Holding Steady

July 8, 2016 11:29 AM

Will farmland in our region follow commodity prices lower?

By: Dennis Badger, Vice President Collateral Risk Management | Farm Credit Mid-America

After nearly a decade of following commodity prices up, farmland values throughout the Midwest have started to decline in response to lower grain prices. Not surprisingly, the biggest declines in land values have occurred as a correction in Corn Belt states where the biggest gains in land values previously occurred. How has our four-state area of Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee compared? To find out, Farm Credit Mid-America appraisers researched and analyzed 4,000 land sales in 2015 and compared them to over 100,000 land sales in our proprietary historical database.

Agricultural property values have declined significantly in Midwestern corn and soybean states. In Iowa, farmland prices fell an average of 15 percent over 2014-15, so we expected that farmland values in Indiana would be hit hard, too. But, the decline in Indiana was less than three percent from 2014-15. Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee actually increased slightly in that period. We believe income diversification and less reliance on commodity prices have helped moderate land values in our area.

Though retail non-ag sales have provided some protection for land values, commodities are still a factor, and land prices could still face pressure in the future due to general economic uncertainty, rising interest rates and other factors. Moreover, a general trend in farmland price declines in the Corn Belt may eventually affect land values here.

2016 Expectations

In our four-state area, we don’t expect a rapid rebound in commodity prices or land values anytime in the next few years, so farm incomes and balance sheets could be pressured. There will likely be fewer land buyers, which means increased marketing time for listed properties with stable-to-declining farmland property values. Land owners who don’t need to sell are likely to hold onto land, resulting in a decreased number of properties on the market.

Cash rents may need to be negotiated if commodity prices stay low, so landlords and farmers may want to consider a flexible farm lease agreement tied to gross farm income. Some owners and tenants use flexible lease agreements where the rent is not determined until after the crop is harvested. The final rental rate is based on actual prices and/or yields attained each year.

Stay Conservative

Many farmers have taken advantage of strong incomes and reduced debt levels over the past few years, but USDA projections for 2016 indicate slightly higher debt compared to last year. An increase in operating loans and declining land values may create more risk with higher debt-to-asset levels in the future. Now is the time for farmers to watch their balance sheets closely and maintain a cautious approach in pursuing any land purchase or rental opportunities. Treat land as a capital purchase – if it doesn't make financial sense on the bottom line and won’t make a profit in the next five to 10 years at expected commodity price levels, then consider holding off on the purchase.

A focus on production efficiency, cost reduction and flexible lease negotiations is more advisable than expansion right now. Rather than buying more land, a safer investment might be adding improvements such as tile drainage or irrigation to your current land. Quality land holds its value better than marginal land, and improvements that enhance yield and income potential also help.

Farm Credit is committed to being a reliable source of credit for customers in any economy. We encourage you to always make borrowing and buying decisions based not only on opportunities but also business need. For more commentary and perspective on trends affecting ag finance, visit the Farm Credit Mid-America website.

Back to news


Spell Check

bad axe, MI
7/8/2016 09:23 PM

  The investor in the European union is running from farmland because of all the currency printing to keep there intitlement programs going. The same thing is going to happen in the U.S . The farm land in the united states will go back to the price it was in 2000-2001 time frame , that's when it started to go up when Bush was pumping 3 to 4 trillion dollars of hot credit money into the economy every year to keep the housing market going. Remember there is 65 trillion dollars of credit market debt in the U.S.A. Every person in the U.S has $200,000.00 of that riding on there back. That's why when you talk to these bankers that's all they talk about is getting F.H.A guarantee on farm loans . Take away the F.H.A guarantee and the crop insurance subsidies the farm land drops like a rock. It took 200 years to get the credit market debt to 4.7 trillion when Reagan had to deal with the last credit crisis. It only took 30 year to grow it to 65 trillion. There is going to be massive deflation in the U.S.A. in the near future, just like was when Reagan had to deal with it in 1980. Just remember you would have to get $130,000.00 per acre for the 600 million acres of pasture and cropland in the U.S.A. just to pay the credit market debt in this country.


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer