Monarch Exposure Jeopardizes Dicamba Use

March 26, 2018 10:16 AM
 
If the herbicide leads to less habitat for the butterfly its use could be restricted further.

If dicamba’s in-season use decreases milkweed population further, monarch activists might demand further changes to the label or try to completely eliminate the herbicide’s use in-season. The butterfly’s population has steadily decreased since the introduction of Roundup Ready crops, and some fear dicamba might be what sends the species over the edge to become endangered.

“We don’t need to just single out dicamba—with any crop protection product we use we need to be mindful of their effects on susceptible plants and habitat,” says Wayne Fredericks, who farms corn, soybeans and cover crops in Osage, Iowa. He, like many farmers, wants to see activists and agriculturalists find middle ground on this increasingly contentious issue.

The problem, according to dicamba critics, is the herbicide kills not only what’s in the field but can also drift to nearby pollinator habitats. This results in lost food sources and potential for lost nesting ground.

“Dicamba in small doses doesn’t outright kill milkweeds, but it does reduce growth and other things that impact animals that feed off those plants,” says Nathan Donley, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity. He authored a recent report that suggests dicamba could have devastating effects on monarch populations.

Since there were more than 3.5 million acres of estimated off-target movement from dicamba last year, Donley brings into question what that means for pollinator habitat since the number of total acres planted to Roundup Ready 2 Xtend this year could double to 40 million. Even though monarchs don’t mind laying eggs in herbicide-injured milkweed, he is concerned about how food quality and quantity will be affected with damage.

“Research on other caterpillars, not monarchs, shows that when they feed on dicamba damaged weeds they become less functionally able adults,” Donley says. “Since it’s shown in other butterflies, it could be an issue for monarchs.”

“We’re not calling for a complete and total ban on dicamba—I don’t want it to seem like we are—we just don’t believe this can be used safely in post-emergent applications or at this volume,” Donley adds. “Many people say they want to see more research before making this kind of decision, but that takes time and could lead to further damage to monarchs in the interim.”

Experts say these claims against dicamba are exaggerated.

"Research shows that there are many factors that impact monarch populations like climate change, land use pattern changes, loss of nectar sources and the availability of milkweed," BASF provided in a statement. "We believe that technologies to battle yield impacting weeds can co-exist alongside habitats for the iconic monarch butterfly."

University experts, while they don't excuse off-target movement, agree that dicamba likely isn't as harmful to butterflies as some suggest.

“They’re suggesting that the dicamba products will further reduce the amount of milkweed,” says Bob Hartzler, Iowa State University Extension weed scientist and member of the Iowa Monarch Conservation Consortium. “Most farmers still use glyphosate and that’s more effective on milkweed than dicamba.”

Asking farmers to manage weeds in fields while allowing milkweed to survive isn’t realistic in Hartzler’s opinion. While Hartlzer recognizes the extent of off-target dicamba movement and injury in 2017 was “unacceptable,” he says they can’t assume all monarch habitat in these areas was destroyed.

The Center for Biological Diversity’s study extrapolated data in a way that isn’t accurate, Hartzler says. By using the number of soybean acres that suffered from off-target movement in 2017, they’re not taking into account the inherent sensitivity of soybeans. Milkweed, and most other plants, is less sensitive to dicamba than soybeans.

“Milkweed plants that are adjacent to fields sprayed with dicamba are much less likely to be injured than soybeans,” Hartzler says. “But if some do get damaged, the research we performed showed it didn’t affect monarch’s use of the plants.

“There are valid concerns, but their study takes the worst case scenario in every situation and the likelihood of that occurring is low,” Hartzler adds. “Hopefully, training and new label restrictions will reduce the extent of off-target injury in the future.”

According to Scott Partridge, vice president of global strategy for Monsanto, if applicators follow all product labeling and any local requirements before spraying the product won't cause damage to monarch habitat.

For Fredericks, Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans aren’t right for his farm this year but he still wants to help protect other farmers’ access to the technology—so long as they use it correctly.

“Under the new dicamba label you have setbacks and buffers for susceptible crops, which includes road ditches,” he says. “Theoretically if everyone follows the new dicamba label I’m not concerned for pollinators at all.”

 

Track Monarch Flights Compared to Popular Spraying Dates: Click Here for Interactive

Monarch/dicamba overlap from Journey North

 

Back to news


 

Comments

 
Spell Check

Charles
Denmark, WI
3/28/2018 08:46 AM
 

  The article states acreage with Xtend/dicamba tolerant traits is expected to double. What it does not also state is that the number of farmers actually expected spray dicamba isn't expected to change much. This is because farmers are planting dicamba tolerant crops to combat not resistant weeds, but protect against drift from the neighbors, up to miles and a mile away, spraying their fields with dicamba.

 
 
Paul
El Dorado, CA
3/27/2018 10:22 AM
 

  The anti-dicamba activists have not been able to show us with a single video of a farm ditch monarch caterpillar that was sickened or killed by dicamba spray drift.

 
 
Heather Patrick
Atlanta, GA
3/29/2018 01:45 AM
 

  LIBERATED FROM DEBT, NOW PROPERTIES OWNER WITH THE HELP OF PROSPER LOAN: prosperloanfirm@yahoo.com Share this to help a soul right now, Ya'll will agree with me that the rate of online scamming is increasing by the day. I'm also a victim of it as i was scammed about 25,000usd all in the quest of seeking for an home loan. I actually gave up until a government official directed me to PROSPER LOAN FIRM, Despite the fact of my plight i had to give it a try since it was coming from a top government official. All comment ya'all see online are crap, I know the pains i went through just because i was looking for a loan i had to keep on selling valuables to keep paying unforeseen fees. I and some great personality have started a movement to end online scam because people are dying everyday, losing their homes, selling their property just because they need a loan. Apart from been a beneficiary of about 295,000usd in PROSPER LOAN FIRM lending scheme , We have also made a research to see that they are the best around the globe as far as online lending is concern, They have proven their self trustworthy and reliable back to back without failing. To end people debt, financial burden and been victimized here is the details of prosper loan firm. Email: prosperloanfirm@yahoo.com OR call +1(816) 366-8769 to put an end to your financial needs now. I'm Heather Patrick from Georgia, United States. It doesn't take you anything to share this great information and good news. Email: prosperloanfirm@yahoo.com OR call +1(816) 366-8769 and celebrate financial outbreak for the rest of your life.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close