Nalivka: Let’s Simplify The Discussion of Trade to Free and Fair

March 20, 2018 02:36 PM
 
The economic welfare of the meat industry rests on both the consumer’s willingness and ability to buy your product.

Everyone is aware beef’s export market will be a key to red meat prices in 2018 given the production increases expected this year. While that comment is pretty non-threatening, the trade policy to achieve those growing exports can often be quite contentious. This has become particularly true this year for anyone talking trade.

Trade is a complex topic.  It creates economic benefit not only to consumers and also American industries, but also, most importantly – Americans.  And I think that is the key to sound trade policy – negotiating strong trade agreements that are free, fair, and reciprocal in how both parties on either side of the negotiating table are treated.

Certainly, it can be a double-edged sword with regard to consumers as it affects prices paid for goods but also affects American jobs. Speaking to meat industry clients across the supply chain, I often comment that the economic welfare of the industry rests on both the consumer’s willingness and ability to buy your product. That ability rests on consumer incomes and those consumer incomes depend on good paying jobs.     

We shouldn’t just put the blinders on and look no further than our own industry and what’s good for prices, but also think about that same consumer’s ability to buy your product. As trade has moved from bilateral to multilateral agreements with layer upon layer of negotiation, one has to begin to ask who are the winners and losers when the ink on the final document dries.  And, even more so, how would you even begin to sort that out in a 5,000 or 10,000 page document?

I recall when I worked in Washington, D.C. in the mid-1980s, I rode to work with one of the USDA trade negotiators who at the time was involved in the negotiations with Japan to lift the import quotas on U.S. beef, oranges and orange juice going into Japan. A final agreement was finally reached in 1988. It was highly successful and represented a significant step forward in opening up the Japanese market for U.S. beef. In 2017, U.S. fresh, frozen, and chilled beef and beef variety meat exports totaled $7.1 billion and Japan accounted for 25% of that total. This is real momentum since that 1988 agreement was signed with Japan.

While the bi-lateral negotiation to reach that final agreement was not necessarily easy, it was far more attainable than the Trans Pacific Partnership multi-lateral negotiation that began 20 years later – at least in my way of thinking. At the same time, the U.S. trade balance remains in the red as it has for 40 years. The goal has to be negotiating fair and balanced trade agreements that will contribute toward a strong and growing U.S. economy with solid job growth.

  

Back to news


 

Comments

 
Spell Check

No comments have been posted to this News Article

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close