Obama or McCain: Who''s best for dairy?

October 26, 2008 07:00 PM
 
By Jim Dickrell

Ok, the 2008 presidential election is a mere seven days away, thank the Lord. And if you haven't made up your mind on whom you're going to vote for, well, time is a-wastin'.

I fully realize my opinion on all things political carries as much weight with most readers as the paper it's written on. And since this is coming to you electronically, that weight has to be measured in the atomic mass of electrons….
 
I also fully realize that some will vote for Sen. Barack Obama because he's not a 90% mirror image of the current White House resident and because he did not jump into the deep end of the cold north Pacific to select his running mate. 

Others will vote for Sen. John McCain because he's not Obama, he's not half-African American (yes, some weak-minded people still let racism fuddle their brains) and because he picked that perky, plain-speaking Governor from Alaska as his V.P. 

Two of my Farm Journal colleagues took the tongue-in-cheek approach to election-year commentating in their October issue. John Phipps writes: "A politician's ambition, of course, is to move up the political ladder until he or she reaches the acme of public service: state retirement."
 
Steve Cornett, at Beef Today, bemoans the fact that neither campaign offers any specific goodies for the cattle industry: "I guess it's not surprising. There aren't enough cow people to populate a feedlot fly strip, much less constitute a demographically important voting bloc."

Roger Bernard, Pro Farmer Washington editor writing for Farm Journal, did a good job of encapsulating the positions of McCain and Obama.

But don''t look for anything on dairy policy because, just like Cornett found in beef, there ain't none. And realistically speaking, your economic future probably hangs on more than the level of dairy price supports, Federal Order make allowances or DEIP allotments.
 
The three key dairy issues this election, as I see it, are energy, immigration and trade.
 

• Energy. Oil prices and ethanol tax credits are closely tied to feed, transportation and fertilizer costs. McCain wants to "Drill, baby, drill," build more nuclear plants and "eliminate mandates, subsidies, tariffs and price supports that focus exclusively on corn-based ethanol." Of these, only the latter could provide immediate price relief for feed stocks.

 

Obama wants to require that 10% of electricity come from renewable sources, including wind, by 2012. He says little about ethanol, though he would provide additional subsidies to ethanol plants that have 25% local investment, and would require at least 60 billion gallons of advanced biofuels by 2030. Again, little immediate relief--though dairy producers hoping to build windmills on the back 40 might take note.

• Immigration. Reading both Senators' plans is remarkable in how similar they are to one another. McCain would "prosecute 'bad actor' employers." Obama would "crack down on employers that hire undocumented workers."  So, if you received a no-match Social Security letter on an employee and didn't reply, does this put you in the sights of both candidates?

Prior to running for President, McCain was left of President Bush on immigration, who himself made an attempt at reasonable reform. But once Sen. McCain became Candidate McCain, he had to appease his right wing, and all reasonableness left the building. Obama has been able to maintain his more "humane" approach throughout the campaign. And with a potential 60-seat, cloture-proof Senate on his side of the aisle, Obama might actually be able to enact reforms.

• Trade. With 10% of U.S. dairy production now being exported, trade policy should get a whole lot more weight in your decision matrix. If the borders ever shut down, it means nearly one million U.S. dairy cows will be out of work—and that's scary. McCain is a free-trader, and "he will pursue multilateral, regional and bilateral efforts to reduce trade barriers." Those include free trade agreements with Colombia and South Korea. McCain doesn't mention the Pacific 4 agreement that includes New Zealand, but one has to assume the free trader that he is…. He also wants to "end all agricultural tariffs, and all farm subsidies that are not based on clear need (emphasis mine)."

Obama wants to "fix the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) so that it works for American workers." That could be problematic for dairy, since Canada is our #1 dairy export market, believe it or not, and Mexico is #2. Together, they account for nearly one-third of our exports—"employing" more than 300,000 of our cows. Tinker with NAFTA, and you jeopardize that market access.

So there you have it. Easy choice, right? Don't forget to vote.

 --Jim Dickrell is editor of Dairy Today. You can reach him via e-mail at jdickrell@farmjournal.com.

This column is part of the Dairy Today eUpdate newsletter, which is delivered to subscribers biweekly and includes dairy industry analysis, dairy nutrition information as well as the latest dairy headline news. Click here to subscribe.
Back to news


 

Comments

 
Spell Check

No comments have been posted to this News Article

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close