Op-Ed: Climate Belongs in Third Clinton/Trump Debate

October 18, 2016 03:16 PM
 
corn_harvets_sunset

For a presidential campaign notable for dark warnings of the coming apocalypse, the one thing that actually could bring about an apocalypse -- climate change -- has been conspicuously absent from the debates. A final chance to raise the issue will come Wednesday, during the campaign’s last debate.

Last week, the feckless Commission on Presidential Debates announced the topics for the upcoming meeting. Fox News host Chris Wallace, the moderator, has selected six areas for discussion, including several that have been amply covered in previous debates. (“Fitness to be president,” anyone?)

Climate change is not among them. Nor was it a topic at the two previous presidential debates, nor at the vice presidential debate.

This is difficult to comprehend and harder to justify. It’s not as if it’s an unimportant or uncontroversial issue. In his seven-plus years in office, President Barack Obama has embarked on one climate initiative after another, always to strenuous (and occasionally justified) objections.

In his first term, Obama invested billions in green energy stimulus. In 2014, he negotiated an agreement on greenhouse gas reductions with China, then followed it with the Paris agreement in 2015, in which almost 200 countries pledged to limit emissions. The administration’s Clean Power Plan is the subject of bitter politics and an all-out legal assault.

Meanwhile, the past two years have been the hottest on record, and the two candidates’ approaches could hardly be more different. Hillary Clinton has promised to invest in clean energy infrastructure and to phase out greenhouse-gas pollutants. Donald Trump has promised to roll back environmental regulations, expand U.S. coal production and disregard climate science.

Too much time in the debates thus far has been spent on the tawdry and embarrassing. Partly this is inevitable -- those have been the defining characteristics of the 2016 campaign, after all -- but it needn’t be this way. Wallace should make room for climate change in the discussion. On one of the most momentous and difficult issues facing their nation and the world, Americans deserve better than a blackout.

--Editors: Francis Wilkinson, Michael Newman.

©2016 Bloomberg L.P.

Back to news


RELATED CONTENT

Comments

 
Spell Check

common sense
Bristol, SD
10/18/2016 08:18 PM
 

  News Flash: The climate is always changing! It is time this foolishness be put to bed, unfortunately, if nurse ratchet the radical witch wins, we can be guaranteed to have non-stop attacks on our lifestyles and MUCH less freedom using climate as one of her excuses!

 
 
Gary Anderson
Cecil, WI
10/19/2016 06:19 AM
 

  Given the option of giving up our freedom to incompetent and power hungry, wealth consuming bureaucracies in a futile attempt to affect climate change under the assumption that our very breathing, emission of CO2, is causing this event, versus allowing the earth to manage its own natural climate change as it has all previous such events, I will choose the latter.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close