OSHA Anhydrous Rules Could Impact Farmers, Ag Retailers

April 29, 2016 05:00 AM

A potential national rule change by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, could revise the way businesses store and handle anhydrous ammonia.

Congress put a rider in the 2016 Omnibus Appropriations Bill preventing OSHA from requiring retailers to adopt stricter handling and storing standards. Because of that, OSHA says they will not enforce stricter rules until a new fiscal year starts this fall.

Nebraska farmer John Oehlerking is not sure if the way he fertilizes his crop today will be the same next year. “I’m sitting in the tractor wondering what I need to do this fall or next spring and how to prepare,” he says.

That’s because OSHA is planning to change the rules governing the storing and handling of anhydrous ammonia. Currently, agricultural retailers have an exemption to OSHA’s safety standards for handling highly hazardous chemicals. But that may change.

OSHA says it changed its interpretation of the type of facility that fits in the retail description. In a statement to AgDay, OSHA says: “Facilities that store and distribute large quantities of highly hazardous chemicals are not retailers.”

Instead, OSHA is putting some of these facilities under the agricultural merchant wholesaler category, which would require new safety measures put in place.

The agency estimates these facilities will have to make roughly $2,100  worth of changes in order to comply. Not everyone agrees with the agency's estimate.

“The cost factor will be horrendous. You can say 4, 5, 6 million dollars. I believe that’s on the low side,” says Frontier Co-op General Manager Randy Robeson.

He says Frontier Co-op has 25 locations in Nebraska, supplying 16,000 tons of anhydrous ammonia. Robeson estimates he will have to double the size of both this liquid and dry fertilizer storage if he has to handle less anhydrous.

“Most likely, we'll get out of the business or handle less," says Robeson.

Ron Velder is president and CEO of Farmers Cooperative. In Nebraska, they supply roughly 53,000 tons of anhydrous a year. He says he will keep supplying; Farmers Cooperative has already made investments in an anhydrous ammonia plant.

“For us to be updated, we’d have to change about sixty tanks. We’re looking at cost anywhere between $8  million to $10 million over time,” says Velder.

Part of that cost includes adapting the standards. For some, that’s added training, documentation, changing out equipment. That also includes storage thanks and piping.

“One of my managers told me it would take six months to get one new tank with the appropriate data label on it. That’s one tank,” said Nebraska Cooperative Council President and General Counsel Rocky Weber.

Robeson, Velder and Weber say a fall switch is not feasible for relying on transportation and building new storage.

“If it’s going to happen over time, then give us some time so we can adapt," Velder says. "It’s not (a) six month (process). It’s going to have to be three to five years."

OSHA says it has given businesses since last July to comply and has been open about the process. In its statement to AgDay, OSHA states:  “OSHA has met with industry groups employers, performed outreach at the local level and offered compliance assistance when needed.”

But farmers say making all these regulatory changes to handling cheapest form of fertilizer is adding a lot of red tape--and expense--during a time of lower farm income. 

“(The impact) could be close to $30  or more an acre. We just can’t sustain that right now,” says Oehlerking.

Weber says Congress has control of this decision and that the wording in the 2017 Omnibus Bill could make or break OSHA’s conclusion.


OSHA Anhydrous Rules Could Impact Farmers, Ag Retailers

Want more video news? Watch it on AgDay.


Back to news


Spell Check

True, TX
4/29/2016 08:49 AM

  osha is an evil abomination. Corrupt and harmful. A racket. Our goverment is completely out of control!!!!!!!! We really need to stand up to this crap somehow!

Marne, MI
4/29/2016 05:44 AM

  We switched to 28% years ago, would never go back to anhydrous, less power needed for application balances out higher cost per pound.

Blaine, MN
4/29/2016 12:22 PM

  We all know that anhydrous can be dangerous if it is improperly handled. OSHA needs to provide accident and fatality data to support it's argument for additional safety precautions. There is nothing worse than solving a problem that does not exist.