Power Hour: Fed Voices Concern about Policies, Farmland Values

January 18, 2013 08:30 AM
Power Hour: Fed Voices Concern about Policies, Farmland Values

Federal Reserve officials are becoming concerned that their attempt to stimulate the economy with additional bond purchases is causing market distortions in some sectors, farmland included.

"Prices of assets such as bonds, agricultural land, and high-yield and leveraged loans are at historically high levels," says Esther George, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. "We must not ignore the possibility that the low-interest rate policy may be creating incentives that lead to future financial imbalances."

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke also has voiced concerns. The Fed must pay close attention to the costs and risk of its policies, he says.

The combination of high farm income and the U.S. monetary policy of dollar stimulus and record low interest rates "have converged to make agricultural land ownership the new sweetheart of investment," says Bruce Johnson, ag economist at the University of Nebraska.

In Johnson’s view, the now multi-year land boom has turned into a bubble. He is not predicting a bust, however, due to a variety of factors different from the 1970s and 1980s. A key one: The agricultural sector today is not overleveraged with debt, and those buying at the top of the market appear to have considerable financial means (half of the purchases bought with debt with no mortgage debt incurred).

"That said, there is still some ‘overshoot nonsense’ in the market today that is not reflective of the basic fundamentals we will need to be purged to get back to more ‘sustainable value’ levels," he says. "That could realistically mean a downward market correction of 30% or more in a few short years—particularly in (Nebraska) where the recent value run-ups have been the most profound."

Nebraska’s all-land average value has more than doubled in less than five years, and in some areas of the state has climbed more than 125%. Between mid-year 2011 and mid-year 2012, land values rose 33%, according to USDA, the highest percentage gain of any state. Only North Dakota and South Dakota recorded somewhat comparable annual gains of 27% and 24%, respectively. The U.S. average was only 11%.


Back to news


Spell Check

1/19/2013 04:38 AM

  Operating loans usually affect the years income. Crop yield, price, equipment breakdowns are major variables. Land costs reflect equity, retirement security, and the collateral for operating loans. Rising prices that are sustainable (slow and steady works best) help the farmer, the investor, the community but a land bubble has the potential of bringing down many while creating a new smaller group of exceptionally wealthy investors. With the recent influx of money through the family farm the risks are expanding greatly. My area had crops last year - no bumper crops but good yields and prices. This year we have no sub soil moisture to go on - greatly increased rents - and much higher costs for crop production, could be another good year, could be a poor year eating up the "land equity". Large cash flow through the farm does not always indicate profit - it is what remains after the bills are paid.

1/19/2013 06:25 AM

  Around here the Bankers are getting nervous. They require 40% security to back a land loan. This tells me they are wanting a fairly good spread if and when the bubble does burst. However if farmers realized the last 10 year net income in combination with the last 10 year interest rate they may not be as blind. Banking on the next 10 years to be similar to the last 2 is just plain gambling. Besides that I think input suppliers and equipt. dealers will soon have a say about the profits farmers are making today.


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer