Proposed Change in Beef Checkoff Causing Controversy

December 7, 2015 07:53 AM
Proposed Change in Beef Checkoff Causing Controversy

A proposal by the Missouri Beef Industry Council to establish a state beef checkoff fee is the subject of what could be a heated public hearing this week in Sedalia.

The beef council has petitioned for a referendum on whether to establish a $1 per head state beef checkoff fee for cattle producers, which would be in addition to an existing $1 per head fee for a federal beef checkoff program.

The Missouri Department of Agriculture will conduct the public hearing Wednesday at the State Fairgrounds in Sedalia.

If Richard Fordyce, director of the Missouri Department of Agriculture, approves the referendum, cattle producers would have to register to vote on it and would cast ballots from Jan. 4 to March 4, The West Plains Daily Quill reported.

Federal beef checkoff fees are used by state beef councils to promote beef industry research, consumer education, industry information and foreign marketing. By law, checkoff dollars cannot be used to lobby or otherwise influence government action.

The Missouri Cattlemen's Association, led by its president, Janet Akers, supports the proposed state fee.

"Our investment in the Beef Checkoff assures us that facts are countering fiction when it comes to beef and how cattle are raised," Akers said in a statement. "This is an investment that this association fully supports," adding that revenue from the state fee would be kept in Missouri to help the state's beef industry.

Bill Bullard, CEO of the national Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund said his organization is working with the Missouri Rural Crisis Center to encourage turnout at the meeting. The two organizations both oppose the proposed referendum.

"Multinational meat packers and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association are worried they don't have enough support to increase the National Beef Checkoff Program tax by another $1 per head. As a result, they have decided to get their extra dollar at the state level. Missouri is one of their early targets," Bullard said in a statement.

And Rural Crisis Center Executive Director Roger Allison wrote, "Since the 1980s, Missouri cattle producers have been paying over $2 million a year into an obsolete, outdated program that has been totally ineffective. Since 1985 . beef consumption has plummeted 31 percent nationally and Missouri has lost 40 percent of its cattle producers. This obviously has not been a successful program for Missouri cattle producers. And now the (MBIC) has the nerve to ask for a 200 percent raise!"

Back to news



Spell Check

Dave Burke
Smithfield, PA
12/12/2015 08:22 AM

  All of these "checkoffs" benefits Big Ag. The producer gets screwed, always. Meat Packers / grain processors Gain, always. Thanks to the idiot Puppets in this Joke of government. Wait till more wake up and just "stop". They can "Eat" all that money they had to have!

Joan Ruskamp
Dodge, NE
12/12/2015 05:46 PM

  I would like to encourage Mr. Allison to look at more than production numbers when talking about the beef checkoff. The recent ROI study by a credible source proved a return of $11.20 for each dollar invested. Our checkoff dollar is fighting to represent us with credible research, promotion and development to keep beef on the plate. This is not the time to abandon ship! This is the time to rally!!!

Matt Scrivner
Eldon , MO
12/8/2015 09:45 PM

  I feel that given the current and expected future of beef production, cost and expected yield, another dollar is yet another un due expense. I do not support.


Corn College TV Education Series


Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!


Market Data provided by
Brought to you by Beyer