Research Results Paint a Picture of Robotic Milking on Midwest Dairies

 
Research Results Paint a Picture of Robotic Milking on Midwest Dairies

The University of Minnesota has compiled important facts and figures that document the management styles, cow behavior and impact of robotic milking systems.

It’s taken nearly two years, but University of Minnesota professor and Extension Dairy Specialist Marcia Endres and her team have compiled important facts and figures that document the impact of robotic milking systems (RMS) on U.S. dairies.

Endres and University of Minnesota colleague Jim Salfer have been conducting a study with 52 RMS farms in Minnesota and Wisconsin, where RMS systems are becoming more common. The researchers have collected on-farm housing and management information as well as daily data from the RMS computers for every cow.

"Along with describing what is happening on the farms, these data allow us to investigate factors associated with productive parameters and make some inferences about cow preferences and behavior," said Endres during an Educational Seminar held Oct. 2 at World Dairy Expo.

Here is a summary of their findings:

• The dairies in the study average 2.6 RMS per farm and 1.4 robots per pen.

• The average number of freestalls per pen is 78.

• Fifty-eight percent of the barns were new, and 42% were retrofitted RMS units in existing barns.

• Forty-seven percent of the farms had automatic alley scrapers, 21% had slatted floors, 6% had bedded packs, and 26% scraped alleys manually.

• Seventy-five percent of the farms had exclusively free-flow cow traffic, 23% had exclusively guided-flow traffic, and 2% had both a free-flow and guided-flow cow traffic system in separate barns.

• Eighty-five percent of the farms had mechanical rotating cow brushes.

• Twenty-one percent of the farms had robotic feed pushers that pushed up the ration on a pre-determined schedule.

• Among the farms, 41.5% had mattresses, 26% sand, 13% waterbeds, 9.5% mattress and pasture, and 6% bedded pack.

• Average feed-bunk space was 20" per cow (out of a range of 10.2" to 42").

• The amount of concentrate fed in the RMS unit was 2 lb. to 25 lb. per day, depending on stage of lactation and type of system (free-flow systems average 2 lb. to 25 lb., guided-flow units average 2 lb. to 18 lb.).

• The Partial Mixed Ration (PMR) in the guided-flow systems was higher in energy and lower in NDF than in free-flow systems.

• In free-flow herds, the PMR was balanced for milk production levels of 10-30 lb. less than the herd’s average production.

• In guided-flow herds, the PMR was balanced for 9-20 lb. less than the average milk output.

• The researchers’ observations indicate that the "milk first" guided system is superior to the "feed first" free-flow system.

• There were herds with greater than 90 lb. per cow per day average with both free-flow and guided-flow systems.

You can reach Endres at miendres@umn.edu.

Back to news


 

Comments

 
Spell Check

No comments have been posted to this News Article

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close