Senate Republicans Pass Keystone Bill

January 30, 2015 06:49 AM
 
Senate Republicans Pass Keystone Bill

The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate passed a bill to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, setting up a conflict with President Barack Obama who has promised a veto.

The Senate voted 62-36 Thursday for the measure that would circumvent the administration review in progress for six years. Nine Democrats joined Republicans who backed the measure. Obama has said he wants to wait until the review is completed before deciding on whether to approve construction of the pipeline.

Differences with a version passed 266-153 by the House on Jan. 9 must be resolved before the legislation is sent to Obama, but supporters pledged to work through those quickly and send a final version to the president.

“This is about energy, jobs, economic activity, national security and building the right kind of infrastructure we need,” Senator John Hoeven, a North Dakota Republican and bill sponsor, said after the vote.

The bill was the first taken up by the new, Republican-led Senate. Lawmakers who back Keystone have sought for years to force Obama’s hand only to be turned away in the Senate when Democrats were in control. The Thursday vote was less than two-thirds majority needed to override a presidential veto.

Jobs Created

Backers say the project would create jobs and increase U.S. energy security by tightening ties with Canada, where the proposed TransCanada Corp. pipeline would originate.

“TransCanada is encouraged by the strong bipartisan support for Keystone XL by U.S. lawmakers,” Russ Girling, the chief executive of the Calgary-based pipeline company, said in a statement.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest Thursday reiterated that Obama would veto the Keystone legislation. Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the Senate’s third-ranking Democrat, said supporters didn’t have votes to override a veto.

The vote today capped two weeks of debate that included votes on dozens of amendments, showcasing a commitment by McConnell to allow a more free-wheeling discussion of legislation on the Senate floor.

Republicans overcame a stumble Monday when Democrats, objecting to limits on amendments they could offer, blocked a procedural vote. That fueled doubts Republicans could meet a goal of passing the bill this week.

Amendments Debated

The two sides agreed to debate additional amendments, and eventually nine Democrats joined Republicans to end debate on the measure earlier today and allow the final vote.

Senators adopted an amendment to promote energy efficiency efforts and made other relatively minor changes.

Republicans blocked Democratic attempts to put the Senate on record saying climate change was a significant problem caused by the burning of fossil fuels. Language saying climate change was happening was added, though it didn’t ascribe it to man-made causes.

The climate-change vote denying a human role in climate change probably will be used in Democratic fundraising pitches and election ads aimed at ousting Republicans.

The $8 billion Keystone project would run through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, where it would connect to an existing pipeline network that extends to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast.

‘Bad Deal’

“The Keystone XL pipeline is a bad deal for the United States and an even worse deal for the future of our children, our environment and our economy,” said Tom Steyer, a Democratic donor and former hedge fund manager who founded NextGen Climate, a group that lobbies for action to combat climate change.

Polls show more Americans support the project than oppose it, though the political payoff for Republicans in backing it probably is small.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll this month found 34 percent of respondents wanted the pipeline built now, while 61 percent said the review should continue. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found 41 percent favored the pipeline. But more than a third -- 37 percent -- said they didn’t know enough to have an opinion.

Environmentalists have rallied to oppose the pipeline because they say it would promote development of the oil sands, threatening Canada’s boreal forests, and spew more greenhouse gases tied to global warming into the air.

The State Department is overseeing the analysis because Keystone XL would cross the border. Eight federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, have until Monday to submit comments to the State Department.

Obama doesn’t face a deadline to decide.

TransCanada proposed building Keystone in September 2008. Opposition in Nebraska led the company to alter its initial route by pushing the pipeline further east to avoid a sensitive habitat and aquifer in the state.

The company broke the project in two, building the southern half and reapplying for a presidential permit for the northern leg with the new route.

The legislation is S.1.

What do you think about the Senate's approval of the Keystone pipeline? What impact do you think it might have on you or your community? Let us know on the AgWeb discussion boards.

 

 

 

Back to news


Comments

 
Spell Check

Julius Gombash
Swanton, OH
1/31/2015 05:07 AM
 

  How many of the people that want the pipeline own propertythat it goes through? Property owners don't want it!

 
 
Sean
SE, CO
1/31/2015 09:28 AM
 

  I'd rather have a pipeline moving oil from north to south and east to west than a bunch of trucks and rail cars offering multiple points of possible spills. I'd let it run through my property depending on terms they offered.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close