Source: University of Illinois Press Release
It is not uncommon for daily fluctuations in corn prices to be attributed to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies. Over a full year, however, it's difficult to establish a connection.
"For the 10 marketing years from 1999-2000 through 2008-2009, for example, we find a very low correlation between the two variables,” said University of Illinois economist Darrel Good. "However, that is not the proper relationship to examine because it violates the assumption of all other things being equal."
One factor revealed in historic corn export data is that exports to the largest importer, Japan, are remarkably constant from year to year. For the period 1999-2000 through 2008-2009, Japan accounted for 26 to 36 percent of annual U.S. corn exports. Japan's imports of U.S. corn were in a narrow range of 567 to 628 million bushels.
"It is generally well known that Japan buys U.S. corn based on the need to support its domestic livestock industry, and that imports are not sensitive to price or exchange rates," Good said. "Data over the 10-year period supports that observation."
Examining the relationship between exports of U.S. corn to destinations other than Japan and the value of the dollar reveals a negative correlation of about 0.4.
"The direction of the relationship is as expected and is relatively strong," Good said. "But that simple relationship ignores the impact of other factors that might influence exports of U.S. corn. Those factors may include such things as the price of corn and the magnitude of grain production outside the United States. Adding those factors to the analysis fails to yield a strong relationship between exports and the value of the U.S. dollar.
"This analysis of the relationship between corn exports and the value of the dollar is not comprehensive and covers a very short period of time. Still, the results suggest that exports of U.S. corn in any given year may not be especially sensitive to the value of the U.S. dollar. In fact, the magnitude of corn exports in a given year does not appear to be highly correlated to other factors such as foreign grain production. The inability to quantify these relationships makes it difficult to forecast corn exports."
According to Good, a second point regarding the effect of the value of the dollar on corn prices is that the export market is now a relatively small portion of the U.S. corn market. Exports this year, for example, are expected to account for only 15 percent of the total consumption of U.S. corn. Exports to destinations other than Japan may account for only 10 to 11 percent of total consumption.
"Even if the influence of the dollar's value on exports is stronger than suggested here, the impact on the price of corn is likely relatively small," Good said. "It appears the impact of the value of the U.S. dollar on the value of corn may be less than implied by daily market commentary. The direct cause and effect relationship is relatively weak.
"There may be some recent economic relationship between the value of the U.S. dollar and crude oil prices, which impacts the value of ethanol and therefore corn," Good continued. "The value of the U.S. dollar and commodity prices may also be correlated to some degree in the current economic environment, as expectations about world economies influence both the value of the dollar and decisions about investment in commodities in general. In any case, it is unlikely that the corn market will completely ignore currency values in the price discovery process, even if the relationship is weak."