Des Moines Utility: Lawsuit Likely Over Nitrates in Water

 
Des Moines Utility: Lawsuit Likely Over Nitrates in Water

After years of struggling to keep drinking water for almost 500,000 residents in Des Moines and its surrounding areas clear of contaminants largely from upstream farms, the Des Moines Water Works board says it plans to sue three counties.

Water Works' lawsuit would aim to hold Calhoun, Buena Vista and Sac counties responsible for the high nitrate levels in the Raccoon River, a primary water source for Des Moines. Before the suit can be filed, the Water Works board must approve doing so in a vote, which is planned for Thursday.

It could be one of the first lawsuits in the U.S. filed by a water utility holding local officials responsible for pollution from farm drainage systems.

"They're transporting groundwater that is heavily polluted because of the agricultural activities," Water Works CEO Bill Stowe said. "They're a point-source polluter like a factory or a city stormwater system or a wastewater plant. The state has chosen to turn its head from regulating them and we're obviously at a point where we no longer consider that to be a tenable outcome."

The Sac County Board of Supervisors who were meeting about the issue Wednesday had no immediate comment, a woman in the county auditor's office said. That board oversees seven drainage districts in coordination with Buena Vista and Calhoun.

Drainage districts were established to help move water out of farm fields so they can be more agriculturally productive. Northern Iowa has the most extensively drained farmland in the country — an estimated 9 million acres.

The three counties that would be targeted under the lawsuit have about 1.2 million hogs, more than a million turkeys and 96,000 cows, according to the most recent U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics. Manure and fertilizer are rich in nitrogen, which helps produce high corn yields. But when left unused in the soil, it can wash into rivers and streams as nitrates.

Iowa began a voluntary program in May 2013 that encourages farmers to reduce runoff, but Stowe and environmental groups argue that strategy lacks measurable benchmarks or a timeline for improvement.

Republican Gov. Terry Branstad and his administration have refused to consider stronger regulation.

"I believe the voluntary approach we have is the most likely to be effective," Branstad said Wednesday. "I think a lawsuit would be a big mistake. I think it would be much better to work in a collaborative basis to try to identify where the problems are and how they can be addressed."

The struggle to maintain drinkable water leaves Stowe with little choice, he said, adding that equipment that removes nitrates has been running since early December at a cost of thousands of dollars a day — which is passed on to water users.

The EPA has set a safe limit of 10 milligrams per liter for city water systems. The Raccoon River was at 14 mg/l on Wednesday morning and above 12 mg/l on the Des Moines River, which is another source of drinking water for Des Moines. The treated water distributed by Water Works was just under 8 mg/l on Wednesday.

Each drainage district is set up so that each landowner pays an assessment equal to the benefit received, which means farmers in the districts will bear the legal costs, according to John Torbert, the executive director of trade group Iowa Drainage District Association.

"It would be like suing the highway because cars travel the highway and cause pollution," he said.

Back to news


Comments

 
Spell Check

Scott De Jong
Alton, IA
3/12/2015 08:09 AM
 

  I believe that we as farmers need to stand up inform others about the processes that we take to insure minimal to no runoff. I have multiple years of data that shows how, when, where and why we apply our nutrients to every area in our fields. I also have the info that shows how much of each nutrient we used to for every bushel of crop that was removed from that field. Each of those nutrients have a “perfect” number that we try to hit and if we have one that is not in that zone, then we look at why that is happening and work to remedy the problem. I have talked to many people who believe that we just dump a bunch of chemicals and fertilizer on our fields and hope nothing runs off. I think that since the Des Moines people feel that the farmers are the issue to all there problems, then we need to boycott every farming activity that happens in that city. That goes from Farm shows to the State Fair.

 
 
Tim Gieseke
New Ulm, MN
1/12/2015 07:57 AM
 

  Analogies are a good way to communicate issues, but John Torbert, ED Iowa Drainage District Association comment, "It would be like suing the highway because cars travel the highway and cause pollution" - wasn't given enough thought. I think the analogy would be, "It would like suing the auto industry for making cars that pollute too much" - and that is what happened and cars pollute less. I am not supportive of a lawsuit, but I am also not supportive of misplace rhetoric.

 
 
steve
sherburne, NY
1/12/2015 05:30 PM
 

  If what I have read about this the water works turns right around and dumps the nitrates right back into the river down stream, so the next town is left to filter out the same nitrates from the water. Also from what I have heard it is less than $2 per customer per year.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close