Deal Reached in Oregon GMO Lawsuit

December 8, 2015 01:32 PM
 
Deal Reached in Oregon GMO Lawsuit

A settlement was reached Monday in a federal lawsuit challenging an Oregon county's ban on genetically engineered crops.

Two alfalfa farms in Jackson County have agreed not to appeal an earlier court ruling that upheld the voter-approved ban. In exchange, the county won't force growers who already planted genetically engineered alfalfa to quickly remove their crops.

Those farmers have agreed not to plant any more genetically engineered crops and to switch their fields out of that alfalfa after no more than eight years.

Jackson County commissioners and a federal court magistrate must OK the settlement before it takes effect.

Bruce Schulz of Gold Hill and James and Marilyn Frink of Sams Valley filed suit a year ago, saying the GMO ban violated their "right to farm" under state law and the loss of crops would cause financial hardship.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke in May dismissed the farmers' arguments, but their claim seeking $4.2 million in compensation from Jackson County had remained in play.

The attorney for the growers, Shannon Armstrong, said in a statement the deal "provides welcome relief" because the farmers can grow valuable crops planted before the law was passed.

The state Legislature approved a bill two years ago that prohibits local governments from regulating genetically engineered crops. An exception was made for Jackson County because its measure had already qualified for the May 2014 ballot.

Voters in the southwest Oregon county approved the measure by a 2-1 margin.

Elise Higley, director of the Our Family Farms Coalition, said the settlement supports the will of voters and "protects farmers growing traditional crops from contamination by genetically engineered crops."

Though genetically engineered crops are common and no mainstream science has shown they are unsafe, opponents contend GMOs are still experimental and promote the use of pesticides.

"We may have very different opinions about genetically engineered crops, but this is a settlement that is fair, reasonable and lets the county move forward in a way that is good for Jackson County's agricultural future," Higley said.

Back to news


RELATED CONTENT

Comments

 
Spell Check

Mischa Popoff
Royse City, TX
12/9/2015 01:46 PM
 

  This is the worst outcome possible for humankind. This marks the first time in 13,000 years that farmers will agree to reject technology. The first time. How exactly is this a good thing?

 
 
Tante Cindy
Hutchinson, MN
12/13/2015 12:41 PM
 

  This is NOT the first time in 13,000 years that farmers have rejected a technology. First, please cool the hyperbole. Secondly, GM wheat seed has not been offered for commercial sale because the developers chose to withdraw their products from the market. The extensive use of GM corn & soybeans in intensive production models has yielded a proliferation of resistant weeds. If resistance is not curtailed, much if not all of the gains obtained by the use of traits shall be lost. I have been highly skeptical of the long term benefits of trait seed from the start - not from concerns about human consumption, but for the true impact of the ecology of the farm. Those answers do not reveal themselves is a few years but over the course of a few score years.

 
 

Corn College TV Education Series

2014_Team_Shot_with_Logo

Get nearly 8 hours of educational video with Farm Journal's top agronomists. Produced in the field and neatly organized by topic, from spring prep to post-harvest. Order now!

Markets

Market Data provided by QTInfo.com
Brought to you by Beyer
Close