Fed Cattle News

How Bullish is the Cattle Inventory Report for the Cattle Market?

Mon, 02 Feb 2026 10:30:15 GMT

USDA’s semi-annual cattle inventory report confirmed the smallest herd in 75 years.
This comes as the cattle industry is still healing from consecutive years of drought, but the surprise is that record high cattle prices aren’t enticing producers to rebuild.
The lack of herd rebuilding has likely extended the historically tight cattle numbers out an additional year.Which means these near to record cattle prices could linger into 2028.

Cattle Inventory Smallest Since 1951
USDA’s semi-annual cattle inventory report confirmed the U.S. cattle herd remains historically small, showing inventory at 86.2 million head, down 317,000 head from last year.

Patrick Linnell, Director of Market Research, CattleFax says: “The total cattle numbers came in down 0 .4 % from year ago, which does take total cattle numbers in the US down to the lowest level that it’s been since 1951. So it does just continue to decline cyclically. and i think that’s the big picture message of this report is that that that expansion while there was some signs of it within this report by and large expansion remains elusive at this point.”

Smaller Beef Cow Herd a Surprise
He says the biggest surprise in the report was a decline in beef cow numbers as the herd is now the smallest since 1961. (Graphic)
Linnell says, “As you looked at just how tight beef cow slaughter was this past year, us and other groups had expected that we would actually see an increase in the beef cow herd. Small, but an increase nonetheless. But however, that’s not what this report showed. It still showed beef cows coming in about 1 % smaller, down about 280 ,000 head.”

Factors Slowing Rebuilding
Linnell attributes the slow expansion to drought, age, lack of labor, higher interest rates, high market risk and financial rebuilding.
“You have a lot of producers who are opting to take the to take today’s paycheck instead of holding back that heifer and counting on returns for her in the future.”

Calf Crop Smallest Since 1941
The calf crop was also down 1.6% at 32.9 million head. The calf crop is the smallest since 1941 indicating the feeder cattle supply will remain tight for a while.”

Linnell says, “The calf crop did come in down about half a million head from year ago, the 2025 calf crop, that is. At the same time, feeder cattle and calf supplies, they continued their decline. 4:02 No surprise there, as you just think about, the multiple years, the continued declines in the calf crop, a slight uptick and heifer retention, and the continued lack of Mexican feeder cattle imports.”

Market Impact
So the cattle cycle isn’t even into the tightest numbers yet.So how long will cattle prices remain strong?
Linnell says, “Fewer potential breeding females coming into 2026 suggests that the calf crop is probably going to be steady to maybe a tick smaller again in 2026 and as you think about the tail of that you know it does suggest that that maybe into the tail of 27 but realistically it’s 2028 before you start seeing an increase in domestic and domestic fed cattle slaughter and domestic fed cattle supplies.”

The wild card is when the border reopens to Mexican cattle.But Linnell is optimistic the cattle market could retest the 2025 highs and stay strong another two to three years.

Top Producer of the Year Finalist: Dalton Farms

Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:38:13 GMT

Dalton Farms of Wakeman, Ohio is a century farm that encompasses 2,000 acres of cropland where Edward and Rebecca Dalton grow corn, wheat, soybeans and spelt. The 2026 Top Producer of the Year award finalists also have a feeder to finish operation consisting of 400 head of Holstein steers they fatten out from about 300 lb. until finish.

For its success in the business of agriculture, Dalton Farms is a finalist for Top Producer of the Year, which is sponsored by BASF and Fendt. The awards banquet will take place, Feb. 9 as part of the 2026 Top Producer Summit.

From Tragedy to Triumph

Edward is the seventh-generation on this farm that split in 1990. He says it was a hard recovery requiring big sacrifices to keep the farm operating, but it allowed him to farm with his father until 2012.

“We farmed together for about seven years after college, so unfortunately my dad passed away of a heart attack,” Edward says. “And so at 27, Rebecca and I kind of took full responsibility of the farm.”

For eight years Rebecca juggled the farm, her career in nursing and family before pivoting.

“When we had our twin boys, I realized I wanted to be home more and be more involved in the farm,” she explains.

Family Centered Beef Business Emerges

That’s when the Daltons started selling their beef direct to consumers through their on-the-farm store called the Meat Barn.

“We started selling more freezer beef in halves and quarters, and that transitioned into smaller bundles for customers because they didn’t all want to buy in bulk,” Rebecca says. “That then turned into, can we get pork from you this way? Can we get chicken from you this way? And we started stocking more of those items.”

The Meat Barn sells products at 15 local gas stations and grocery stores. Plus, Rebecca is partnering with 30 other local farmers to provide the community with a variety of products sold at the Meat Barn and through farmers markets.

“We started just working with more local vendors to sell honey and maple syrup and popcorn and sauces and all of those things as well,” she says.

This has made the Meat Barn, and their farm, an agritourism outlet that focuses on direct-to-consumer goods, and they currently have a four month waitlist for halves and quarters.

“And we’ve added on multiple times already to help with that production, but the demand is there,” she says.

Rebecca says their customers like to know the farmer that produces their food, and Edward agrees that since COVID-19 the pendulum has swung back to consumers wanting to know more about their food supply.

“I think through this movement, people do care where their food comes from again,” he says. “They want to know the farmer and wanna know the story.”

Cattle Production Focused on Health and Efficiency

While the Daltons’ family-centered beef business focuses on consumers, Edward says they’re still pushing to reach their production goals in their cattle operation.

“We’re always trying to be as efficient as we can with feed rate of gain,” he says. “We’re not trying to always reinvent the wheel but making sure we’re not missing something. To just make sure our cattle are as healthy and as efficient as they can be because I truly believe the healthier they are from Day 1 until ending, the better product you end up with.”

The Daltons’ Laser Focus on Finances

From their beef and cattle business to grain farming, the Daltons track every aspect of their finances.

“We pay attention to everything is what we really try to do and try to be efficient with our money,” Edward says. “We don’t always have the latest and greatest of everything, but we try to be productive with everything we have.”

Transition From Organic to Commercial Grain Production

For the past several years, the Daltons grew organic grain, which helped them grow financially. However, Edward says last spring they made the difficult decision to switch those acres back to commercial grain production.

“We just couldn’t dedicate the time,” he says. “We were losing too much with our kids and with life experience and time we just could get back, and we chose the time with our family over being in the field.”

According to Edward, when it comes to grain production, efficiency is still their goal.

“Well, I’d always like to be more profitable per acre in our grain side, no matter what,” he says. “I think that’s probably a typical grain farmer, never satisfied no matter what.”

Building for the Future

The Daltons are proud of the financial progress they’ve made the past several years, such as adding employees to the team. Edward says he’s excited Rebecca can now be full time on the farm.

“Certainly, a milestone was being able to have my wife leave the hospital and come join us at the farm full time and have no off-the-farm income,” he says.

Rebecca says it’s a way to help preserve the legacy of Edward’s father and have it carry on through their sons.

“I definitely see our kids on this farm,” she says. “Whether it’s working the meat barn, I can’t tell you that, but I know that they will be a part of this farm, whether it’s row crop farming or raising cattle. I think that they would definitely have a part of the farm.”

Click here to register for the 2026 Top Producer Summit.

Tightest Cattle Supply Predicted in The Next 60 to 90 Days

Fri, 23 Jan 2026 17:56:32 GMT

While fundamentals continue to drive the cattle market, increasing prevalence of external factors can play havoc day-to-day.

Based on placements the past six months, Brad Kooima of Kooima Kooima Varilek believes the tightest supply of this entire cattle cycle will occur in the next 60 to 90 days. It wouldn’t be the first-time the market makes a high in February or March.

“Now beyond that, I don’t see there’s a tremendous chance to have an oversupply of cattle going into the summer,” he adds. “However, you’ve got things like the Mexican border that are coming into play. So, I’m trying to react to what I see, but the fundamentals aren’t going to change.”

Here are seven other takeaways from Kooima’s recent conversation with Chip Flory on AgriTalk:

1. Fundamentals Still Drive The Cattle Market.

“I wish we could just talk about cattle fundamentals,” he says. “I’m still an old-school fundamentalist who believes a lot in trying to figure out where we’re at with supply and how we’re getting along with the boxes and beef demand.”

Rumors and misguided comments, such as the New World screwworm (NWS) scare a week ago and geopolitical factors this past Tuesday, can cause the markets to react.

“Now, is it only supply? Of course not,” Kooima says, regarding what drives the markets. “But if I had to start there, barring more of this outside, new stuff we’ve been inundated with, I think the market still generally driving the deal. We don’t have enough cattle, and that’s why they’re cutting kill. That’s why they’re closing plants. There’s not enough to go around.”

2. Heifer Retention Exists But Isn’t a Major Market Factor.

Kooima says heifer retention has started but is insufficient to significantly change the supply trajectory.

“It’s not like 2015 when we flipped a switch and the whole world decided to save them at one time, but it’s there,” he says.

He’s predicting a 1% to 2% increase, saying the retention is regional — referring to the Dakotas, Montana and Colorado.

“What’s driving it is economics,” Kooima says. Some ranchers can’t afford to not sell their heifer calves, while other factors include the age of the rancher, no desire to deal with first-calf heifers and drought.

When asked if there is enough heifer retention to move the needle to bring some relief on the supply side, Kooima responds: “The short answer would be no. We’re never going to have a cow herd like we had 10 years ago. We’re going to have to figure out how to do with less.”

He says the strategy to increase supply is feeding to heavier weights and the growth in beef-on-dairy.

“The gorilla in the room, to me, is beef-on-dairy,” he says. “From a couple of standpoints, just from a raw supply standpoint, the dairy cow herd’s the biggest since 1993. It’s grown and grown, and why wouldn’t you if you can get $1,200 to $1,500 for a day-old calf?”

3. Mexico Has Built Feeding and Processing Infrastructure in Response to Border Closure.

Kooima says with the U.S.-Mexico border closed due to NWS, Mexico has figured out how to finish and process cattle.

“I think there’s a lot of people there who don’t want anything to happen,” he says, regarding reopening the border. “They’re benefiting from this great big bull market and now they’re selling the beef to us. So, it may never exactly be the way it was again. They waited too long on this matter, in my opinion. It’s not a market factor.”

4. Beef-on-Dairy and Vertical Integration Are Rising Concerns.

Kooima shares his concern about the long-term implications of vertical integration and the consequences of the growing beef-on-dairy supply.

“For the first time, you got an integrator that has the ability to control that thing from its birthday and schedule it out 341 days later to slaughter,” he explains. “A dream that the packers chase. I watched them wreck the hog market. I see what happened in poultry. This scares me to death. The combination of all of that is we’re losing price discovery. They’re going to try to slow it down as much as they can until they can control the supply.”

5. Packers Are Adapting to the Market.

Kooima says the closing of Tyson’s Lexington plant and shift reduction at its Amarillo plant are examples of the broad industry trend to reduce harvest rates and shutter facilities when supplies tighten. He explains the closing will result in even less negotiated trade. The Lexington plant primarily did formula (non-negotiated) pricing, and he predicts those formula customers will now go to Tyson’s Dakota City plant.

“Dakota City, a plant that’s closest to me, 64 miles away, is likely going to become a formula plant. It’s going to further deteriorate price discovery up in this neck of the woods,” he stresses.

He adds packers are also using tight supplies as an opportunity to perform necessary cooler clean-out cycles and reduce the number of harvest days per week.

“They’re systematically reducing kill to try to gain some leverage back,” Kooima says.

When it comes to regional packers, he hopes they can survive: “I think they’re critical to price discovery.”

6. Demand for Beef Remains Strong.

Kooima is bullish about beef demand, especially amid supply tightness.

“When people say demand is pretty good, I go ‘No, it is phenomenal,’” he says. “The demand for grind is crazy. We have to make sure we can continue to fuel that rocket.”

7. Risk Management is Essential Amid Market Uncertainty.

On protecting against risk, Kooima advises: “My mantra is and has been for a year and a half to buy some puts. You’re going to have to buy puts to keep you in business. Let’s not let 2015 happen to us again.”

He goes on to add: “Do I think that there’s a high-risk point here in the short term? No, obviously, I just said I think we’ve got the tightest numbers ever, but there’s always something that can go wrong, so be careful.”

Listen to Kooima’s and Flory’s AgriTalk conversation here:

Your Next Read — Shrinking Slaughter Capacity: What’s Next in 2026?

Tyson's Lexington Beef Plant Shutters Early: No Shifts Scheduled This Week

Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:19:05 GMT

In November, Tyson Foods announced plans to permanently close its Lexington processing plant on Jan. 20. The announcement shocked the beef industry and specifically the town of Lexington, Neb.

A University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) analysis estimates the annual statewide economic impact of the closure will be $3.28 billion.

The beef plant, which opened in 1990, was one of the largest in the nation. According to UNL the plant employs approximately 3,200 team members and has the capacity to slaughter 5,000 cattle per day, which equates to about 4.8% of total daily U.S. beef slaughter.

Read more:
What Does Tyson’s Announcement Mean to Beef Producers?

Sources told Farm Journal late last week, Tyson has not scheduled any shifts at the Lexington facility the week of Jan. 16.

Expected Economic Impact

The closure of the beef plant will be one of the biggest shocks in history for the small town Lexington, which is home to about 11,000 people. However, the ripple effect will be felt throughout the Nebraska economy.

According to the UNL analysis, total labor income losses from the closure are projected to be $530.43 million per year across 7,003 jobs. Of those, 3,212 are positions directly eliminated at the plant, with the remainder representing additional jobs that support the workers in other sectors

UNL expects a substantial reduction of tax revenues in the aftermath of the closure. Annual losses in state personal income tax revenue are estimated at $23.2 million. State sales tax revenues are projected to decline by $10.16 million per year, and local sales tax revenues accruing to Dawson County are expected to fall by $2.77 million per year.

Conducting the analysis was Eric Thompson, UNL economics professor, and Elliott Dennis, UNL associate professor livestock marketing and risk management.

“These impacts would be larger if a greater share of cattle processed at the plant were purchased from Nebraska feedlots or if cattle accounted for a larger proportion of total plant costs,” they explain. “Conversely, the estimated impact would be smaller if the total value of beef sold were lower. Tax rates are based on historical tax data and may vary from year to year depending on employee deductions and other factors.”

Shrinking Slaughter Capacity: What's Next in 2026?

Wed, 24 Dec 2025 17:33:42 GMT

The long-feared rightsizing of shackle spaces to more closely match the number of cattle has begun.

“The market’s reaction to the November announcement was a good reminder that market volatility still exists even when the supply and demand fundamentals continue to be positive forces into the start of 2026,” says Dave Weaber, Terrain senior animal protein analyst, in his Q1 2026 Outlook .

In late November, Tyson Foods announced its plan to end operations at its Lexington, Neb., beef facility and convert its Amarillo, Texas, beef facility to a single, full-capacity shift.

“Terrain estimates the changes will eventually reduce U.S. slaughter capacity by about 6.6%,” Weaber explains. “However, slaughter plant capacity utilization is still nearly 6% behind historical norms, as the number of cattle is still well short of filling available slaughter capacity.”

Weaber predicts this positive shift in operational efficiency will likely encourage plants to fill available capacity and better compete for the available cattle.

“I expect utilization to decline by about 2% during 2026 when two new plants in Nebraska and Missouri complete their startups,” he adds.

A proposed plant in the Panhandle of Texas that would handle 6,000 head per day has the potential to lower utilization rates back to early-2025 levels if completed.

“Even without additional future slaughter capacity, utilization rates will remain low; fed cattle numbers are expected to decline during the next two to three years because of cow-calf producers’ beef cow herd expansion efforts,” Weaber summarizes.

The reduction in current fed slaughter capacity will help the remaining plants run more volume, improving efficiency by spreading fixed and semi-variable costs across more head and pounds of beef. This positive shift in operational efficiency will likely encourage plants to fill available capacity and better compete for the available cattle.

“I expect that in the near and intermediate term, this effect will at least partially offset the shift in market leverage, which currently favors the packer,” Weaber says.

Markets and Beef Prices Remain Resilient

Beyond the near-term impacts to futures traders’ sentiment, the market impacts of the announced closures are fading.

“Calf, feeder cattle and fed cattle cash markets are already recovering and have posted significant rallies,” Weaber says. “Fed cattle supplies for the first half of 2026 are not going to change. The number of cattle placed into feed yards is the number placed and will be the number that gets slaughtered. The location the cattle get processed into beef may change, but overall beef production is mostly set.”

(USDA NASS, Terrain)

He adds: “ Consumer beef demand and spending remain strong and supportive of cattle prices. Presidential and executive branch rhetoric about lowering beef prices has had little to no impact on retail and wholesale beef prices. Tariff reductions on imported lean trimmings from South America are driving volumes, but prices for contracted loads delivering in the first quarter of 2026 are record high, up 20% from a year earlier.”

“I expect the choice cutout to average between $375 per cwt and $385 per cwt and fed cattle prices to average between $234 per cwt and $238 per cwt in Q1.”

— Dave Weaber

Q1 2026 Price Outlook

“I expect available fed cattle supplies during the first quarter of 2026 to be 6% to 7% smaller than the year prior,” Weaber says. “Even with a 2% shift in leverage (fed cattle price to comprehensive cutout) to the packers’ favor, I expect the Choice cutout to average between $375 per cwt and $385 per cwt and fed cattle prices to average between $234 per cwt and $238 per cwt in Q1.”

By early December, light feeder cattle and calf auction prices have recovered much of the losses incurred since late October and appear poised to start 2026 at record levels.

“Changes to the U.S.-Mexico border status remain the greatest known risk for cattle prices,” Weaber stresses.

Further rallies in deferred live cattle futures will drive the balance of the recovery in prices for heavy feeder cattle that make up the CME feeder cattle price index. He explains demand for light cattle to be turned out on wheat pasture and California coastal range has been a key driver for the rally in light cattle.

Biggest Risk Is South of the Border

Changes to the U.S.-Mexico border status remain the greatest known risk for cattle prices.

“The Mexican government has implemented broad cattle movement and import restrictions within the country as well as greater fly control measures in partnership with the USDA,” Weaber says. “Meanwhile, U.S. and Mexican officials have begun inspections of only one border crossing into New Mexico. Additional cases of New World screwworm have been found in Mexico, which I expect to further delay the reopening.”

Active risk management to preserve operation equity should remain a priority.

“If the border were to reopen, cash feeder cattle and calf prices and feeder cattle and live cattle futures would be the first to move down,” Weaber explains. “The magnitude of the impact will depend on the rate-limiting and cost impacts of the protocols that are implemented and the number of backlogged cattle south of the border.”

One Lesson From Plant Closures

“If we’ve learned anything from the market reactions to the plant announcements, it’s that price volatility should be a focus for producers in all segments of the cattle industry,” Weaber says. “Active risk management to preserve operation equity should remain a priority.”

Your Next Reads:
Navigate Market Volatility with Risk Management Strategies

Beef’s Future: Consumer Demand, Risk Management and the Path to Continued Profitability

What Does Tyson's Announcement Mean to Beef Producers?

Mon, 24 Nov 2025 23:32:27 GMT

Chaos in the cattle market continues as Tyson Foods announced on Friday its plan to end operations at its Lexington, Neb., beef facility and convert its Amarillo, Texas, beef facility to a single, full-capacity shift. The cattle complex was limit down Monday reacting to the announcement.

The Lexington plant employs nearly 3,200 people and can harvest 4,500 cattle a day, but has been running 3,600 to 3,700 according to John Nalivka of Sterling Marketing. It is one of 11 beef facilities in the company and one of the largest. The transition in Amarillo is expected to reduce daily harvest numbers from 5,500 to 2,700 to 2,800 and impact 1,700 workers. Tyson says the changes will go into effect on Jan. 20, 2026.

Jeff Stolle, Nebraska Cattlemen’s Association director of marketing, predicts the Lexington plant closure will reduce Nebraska cattle harvest capacity by 15%.

“The Tyson plant in Lexington has been a very valuable and consistent piece of our packer processor infrastructure in the state for up against 35 years now, and to lose this amount of harvest capacity on a daily basis is definitely going to be a challenge,” Stolle says.

The announcement is a shock as Stolle says there are significant feedyard expansion projects in the works, and he hopes there’s a future opportunity to bring the Lexington facility online with different ownership.

“Given the feeding infrastructure that is located near the Lexington plant, and the availability of high-quality feeder cattle and feedstuffs, we obviously hope there is some sort of path toward the plant continuing to operate as a harvest facility,” Stolle summarizes.

Don Close, Terrain senior animal protein analyst, explains the announcement comes following a rough year for the meatpacking industry and admits a plant closing has been a possibility for the last 18 months.

“Fed beef packers have been losing an average of $200 per head,” he says. “Those margins have certainly improved over the last two or three weeks, but it has been a tough year, and I don’t know that we’re near the end of this yet.”

Tyson’s announcement says it is shifting production to other plants to increase efficiency. But why close Lexington?

Elliott Dennis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln livestock and meat economist, predicts Tyson targeted its least efficient plant for closure to maximize profitability across its operations, highlighting the importance of operational efficiency in the beef industry.

Other analysts speculate competition from the new Sustainable Beef Plant in North Platte might have played a role.

According to Trey Wasserburger, Sustainable Beef is currently harvesting 1,100 head per day but plans to ramp up to 1,500 by Jan. 1.

Overcapacity Issue

Derrell Peel, Extension livestock marketing specialist from Oklahoma State University, says the Tyson announcement reduces capacity in the industry but does not solve the problem of overcapacity.

“This will reduce industry slaughter capacity by roughly 7,000 to 8,000 head per day,” he explains. “The exact impact will depend on forthcoming details, especially how Tyson will manage a one-shift plant. Depending on the details, the reduction represents roughly 7.5 to 9% of total industry slaughter capacity.”

Peel says Monday to Friday daily fed slaughter thus far in 2025 has averaged 90,529 head per day, down 3.6% from the recent peak (93,931 head per day) in 2022. However, Saturday slaughter has averaged 4,878 head this year, just 13.1% of the 37,137 head per day average in 2022.

For the first 45 weeks of the year, total weekly fed slaughter has averaged 457,524 head compared to 506,793 head per week in 2022, a decrease of 9.7%. The Tyson planned reduction in packing capacity might be nearly (but not quite) enough to balance the decrease in cattle slaughter since the peak in 2022. However, fed slaughter is expected to continue decreasing in 2026 and 2027.

“Excess packing capacity will continue to be an issue for beef packers for the foreseeable future,” Peel summarizes.

Short- and Long-Term Impacts of Lexington Plant Closure

Dennis says the Lexington plant closure will have immediate short-term effects on cattle prices. Drawing parallels to the 2019 Holcomb, Kan., plant fire, he predicts prices potentially falling and taking months to recover.

“Back in 2019, it took us about five to six weeks to find a bottom on the live cattle market,” Dennis says. “From the time we had that announcement of the fire, we ended up going about 12% down from where we were at pre-fire, and it took us almost three, three and a half months to get back to pre-fire prices.”

Dennis says the finished cattle will redistribute to other regional plants and the impact will be more about change in value proposition and logistics for producers than the ability to find a buyer.

Hyrum Egbert, meatpacking industry analyst, explains, “Tyson just changed the math on U.S. beef.”

He predicts the short-term impact will be:

Live cattle and feeders. Nearby futures and regional cash should soften, especially around Lexington/Amarillo as cattle lose a local bidder and get pushed farther to other plants. Expect weaker basis in those draw areas.
Beef cutout/wholesale. He says this is a rationing signal to beef buyers. Even if some volume is picked up elsewhere, the headline is tighter kill space which will lead to bullish cutout as buyers front-load coverage.
Packer margins. Less capacity chasing the same tight cattle supply will equate to better gross margins for packers.
Logistics and spreads Longer hauls for cattle will lead to higher freight, wider regional price dispersion and more noise in cash versus formula debates.

Long-term Egbert summarizes: “This isn’t a Saturday kill adjustment; it’s a permanent trim in hooks. Capacity is being pulled closer to the ‘new normal’ cattle supply, which reduces the odds of prolonged negative packer margins in the next phase of the cycle.”

Likewise, Dennis predicts long-term the closure will reduce cattle prices due to lower processing capacity and less competition. Yet despite disruptions, he says the fundamental demand for beef is historically high, driven by consumer preference and quality improvements, which should help support cattle prices in the long run.

“With tighter U.S. kill space on top of a small herd, imports — especially lean for grind — matter even more,” Egbert adds. “Tariffs, quotas and border policy will have an even stronger influence on spreads and retail prices. This is not likely going to be the last of plant closures. Regional plants are still extremely vulnerable and susceptible to closure.”

What’s Next for Producers and Packers

“I don’t think producers necessarily need to do anything different,” Peel says. “I still think there’s excess capacity in the industry, even with this downsizing, so there will be plenty of demand. I don’t think it changes anything. It doesn’t change the supply fundamentals at all.”

Close agrees with Egberts prediction that this might not be the last plant closure. He says Tyson’s announcement clears the path for other packers to follow suit.

“It’s not out of the realm of possibilities that we see another large plant or some of the smaller regional plants closed before we reach bottom in this cattle supply,” Close says.

Peel says with Tyson’s decision to reduce a shift and not close Amarillo is a positive.

“By only making a one shift adjustment in Amarillo, that tells me that decision was very much just directly a function of availability of cattle, but it also means they have the ability to go right back up to two shifts when the time gets right, as far as cattle availability,” Peel explains. “They just spent a lot of money in Amarillo remodeling and refurbishing that plant, so I don’t think they’re going to walk away from it completely, unless things continue to deteriorate for them in terms of their beef business.”

Dennis reminds producers the importance of managing price risk using available tools (like futures and options) because market volatility is unpredictable. He stresses risk management should be proactive, not reactive.

Close was a guest on AgriTalk Monday discussing the impact of the Tyson announcement as well as other beef industry economic factors today.

Your Next Read: CattleFax Predicts Profitability Despite Increased Uncertainty

What Does Talk of $10 Ground Beef Mean to Producers?

Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:00:36 GMT

While the core fundamentals of the beef industry remain unchanged, the overall environment has become much more volatile and uncertain in recent weeks.

Omaha Steaks CEO Nate Rempe, in a recent interview on Fox Business’ Mornings with Maria , predicts ground beef prices will reach $10 per pound by the third quarter of 2026.

In response to that prediction, ag economist Glynn Tonsor from Kansas State University reports, according to September Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the national average price for ground beef was $6.32 per pound. He explains while niche markets such as Omaha Steaks could see some products priced at $10, the national average is unlikely to reach that level within the next three years.

Tonsor emphasizes Omaha Steaks serves a distinct customer base, and their prices should not be generalized to represent all U.S. ground beef prices.

Lance Zimmerman, senior animal protein analyst with Rabo AgriFinance, adds: “It’s possible, but that’d be pretty wild. Is it probable? I would say no, based on history.”

He explains his stance also referring to the BLS historic data, although prices spiked radically during the pandemic posting the highest year-over-year increases on record, that event only resulted in a 34% jump, far short of the 54% increase needed to see $10 ground beef by the third quarter of 2026.

What Does All This Beef Chatter Cause?

The beef industry has found itself in national headlines since Sept. 15. The industry has been experiencing chaos in the markets since President Donald Trump made statements regarding the need to lower beef prices as well as his request for the Department of Justice to investigate meatpackers for driving up the price of beef.

“The base fundamentals of the industry have not changed in the last four weeks,” Tonsor says. “The volatility, the noise in the business environment, has definitely elevated.”

Read more about the industry chaos today:
Beef Industry Chaos: Tight Supplies, Strong Consumer Demand and Political Interference

Zimmerman explains while political sound bites and promises to lower food prices draw media attention, they do not directly affect the day-to-day decisions by producers who remain focused on long-term business fundamentals.

“At the end of the day, the average cow-calf producer, stocker operator and feedlot operator, have a business to run, and all of this noise doesn’t change much surrounding their day-to-day business,” Zimmerman summarizes. “The challenge is the president is making this a very regular soundbite, as is the rest of his administration. And, cyclically, there is no quick fix.”

Zimmerman shares his frustration regarding the broader impact of political statements, especially presidential promises to bring down food prices. He explains that, historically, the only way to significantly reduce food costs is to enter a recession. The catch, he argues, is that neither administration nor producers desire such an outcome. This underscores the conflict between policy rhetoric and on-the-ground market drivers.

Tonsor adds media attention and dramatic statements, such as $10 ground beef, often do not accurately represent broad market reality.

“I’m trying to use this as an excuse to educate on why prices are higher; [it’s] not just because cow numbers are down,” Tonsor explains. “When we just jump to the number of cows, we don’t give credit to the demand story that the public wants beef.”

Read more about beef demand:
Consumers Confirm Protein is In: Meat Continues to Have Its Moment on the Plate
How Many Minutes Does a Consumer Have to Work to Buy A Pound of Ground Beef?

One question on the mind of producers and industry stakeholders is if the political and media attention will heighten consumer awareness to beef prices and cause a change in buying behavior.

Tonsor says, so far, there is little impact from these headlines on consumer demand.

“It’s too early to tell if there’s been a consumer demand impact from all the chatter,” he says. “My best guess is little-to-no direct impact.”

Both analysts agree beef prices are fueled by demand. Tonsor notes consumers are willing to pay the retail price of beef today because of their continued demand for taste and protein. He points out if public demand for beef stays strong, prices will remain robust.

“The public still thinks taste is the most important thing when they make a decision,” he summarizes.

Slowing Down Rebuilding

“This uncertainty has wrecked the market potential in Chicago in the short run,” Zimmerman explains. “But the timing of it also couldn’t be worse for the cow-calf producer who’s making those fall retention decisions right now.”

Both analysts agree the heightened uncertainty is making producers more hesitant to invest or expand their herds, which will lead to slower industry investment and herd growth.

Read more about herd rebuilding:
Rebuilding the U.S. Cow Herd: A Calculated Climb

“I think we’re going to slow investment compared to even a month ago, just because those that are anxious or don’t like uncertainty are a little more cautious today than they were a month ago,” Tonsor explains. “Those that are extra uncomfortable with elevated uncertainty, like not knowing what the trade environment might be, it’s going to give them pause. So, they will be less likely to hold back a heifer and expand. They’ll be less likely to modernize the feedyard. They’ll be less likely to do whatever that capital investment was.”

Will Tarriff Reduction Impact Prices?

Late last week, Trump signed an executive order that modifies the scope of the reciprocal tariffs he first announced on April 2. The executive order now exempts several agricultural products from tariffs, including beef.

Zimmerman explains Brazil’s beef processors and beef exporters would have gained the most if the country’s additional tariffs were removed by the U.S. The previous rate was an additional 50% tariff on top of the 26.4% tariff that exists on all imports from countries without a free-trade agreement on beef after the first 65,005 MT each calendar year. However, the Brazil tariffs are structured under two separate practices. Ten percent are reciprocal tariffs, and the additional 40% that came in August are through another process.

“The latest removal of reciprocal tariffs on beef effectively changes Brazil’s country-specific import tax from 50% to 40%,” he explains. “This is not going to significantly change the competitive landscape for global exporters shipping into the U.S. market. It is still incredibly tough for Brazil to compete with Australia, New Zealand and other major lean beef importers in the U.S. market.”

Tonsor adds reducing tariffs could marginally lower beef prices for consumers, but the effect would not be dramatic. He points out the U.S. produces the majority of its own beef (more than 80%), so changes in import tariffs have a limited impact on domestic prices.

He says recent record import months only moved the import share from around 15% to slightly more than 20%. Tonsor expects the net effect of the tariff reduction on beef prices to be fairly small, potentially less than a 5%-to-10% change, and that overall, strong domestic demand will continue to be the main driver of prices.

Challenge to Producers

Tonsor says his advice to producers is to steady the ship.

He encourages a steady approach, suggesting those comfortable with uncertainty should move forward as planned, while others might pause on major decisions. Ultimately, he expects less herd expansion and more caution among producers, even as demand fundamentals continue to provide underlying strength for the industry.

Tonsor says while general industry investment and expansion might slow, producers who move forward despite the uncertainty could be rewarded, especially if fewer others do the same. His overall message is for producers to carefully weigh their risk tolerance and business needs before making significant changes and not to let the current noise distract from their long-term goals.

Despite recent market corrections, Zimmerman says strong demand and cyclical tightness mean profitability remains high for most producers. He shares these six strategies for producers to consider looking forward:

Consider Strategic Heifer Retention. He advises producers to begin or continue retaining heifers, even if only enough to replace natural attrition in the cow herd, as a step toward gradual herd rebuilding in tight supply conditions.
Use Price Protection Tools. He emphasizes the importance of locking in profit floors using risk management tools such as Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) insurance , futures or options contracts, encouraging producers not to wait for the highest prices but to protect profitability when opportunities arise.
Maintain Long-Term Perspective. Despite recent market corrections, he urges producers to keep a long-term view; demand is strong, and rebuilding will be slow, so planning for sustained higher prices is key.
Stay Vigilant and Informed. He recommends producers remain watchful for profit opportunities in the market, be proactive in their strategic decisions and stay informed about both market trends and policy changes.
Be Cautious, Not Reactionary. He suggests not overreacting to political headlines or media narratives, emphasizing that day-to-day operational fundamentals should guide decisions rather than short-term noise.
Prepare for Continued Volatility. He encourages resilience and adaptation strategies as the industry faces persistent uncertainty from trade policy and disease threats such as New World screwworm .

Your Next Read: Did the Administration’s Plan to Lower Beef Prices Wreck the Bull Run in the Cattle Market?

Beef Industry Chaos: Tight Supplies, Strong Consumer Demand and Political Interference

Wed, 12 Nov 2025 20:04:16 GMT

The current state of the cattle market and beef industry has been described as chaotic. “There’s chaos in cattle,” as Chip Flory, AgriTalk host, put it.

The industry turmoil follows recent statements made by President Donald Trump regarding the need to lower beef prices as well as his request for the Department of Justice to immediately begin an investigation into meatpackers for driving up the price of beef.

Derrell Peel, Extension livestock marketing specialist from Oklahoma State University, affirms these are unique times, emphasizing while political factors have always indirectly influenced agriculture, it’s unprecedented for the cattle and beef markets to be at the center of direct political debate.

On a recent AgriTalk segment, Peel points out the inherent biological and production constraints of the cattle industry — particularly the fixed timeline to raise cattle — make quick fixes impossible. Both Flory and Peel stress that no political policy can shorten the cattle production process; any effective supply response requires patience and long-term adjustment.

Packers Under Fire

The concept of industry consolidation and foreign packer ownership has long drawn scrutiny with frequent government investigations. Peel says highly concentrated industries such as beef packing have been targets for skepticism and regulatory attention for over a century, to the point suspicion of packers is almost “a cultural thing” within segments of the industry.

He characterizes the latest call as another attempt to target convenient scapegoats rather than addressing deeper systemic realities of supply and demand.

“The reason we have the industry structure we do is because the economies of size and cost efficiencies are such a powerful economic force,” Peels explains.

He confirms researchers have long studied market power, and while concentration does have a small negative price impact for producers, the efficiency and cost-savings from large-scale firms more than compensate. These benefits, he says, keep cattle prices higher for producers and beef prices lower for consumers than they would be with a less efficient structure.

Dissecting the economics of margin markets Peels explains why price changes in different parts of the beef supply chain — cow-calf, feeders, packers and retailers — don’t move in lockstep. He uses a “bungee cord” analogy to illustrate the complex, dynamic and time-lagged interactions linking cattle prices at the farm with retail beef prices.

“All cattle prices and beef prices are ultimately connected, but they’re not connected with a stick or a chain,” Peel summarizes.” They’re connected with a bungee cord. There’s just an enormous amount of dynamics in this thing.”

Regarding the foreign ownership debate, Peel says there is no evidence foreign ownership alters packer behavior within the U.S. marketplace. He emphasizes foreign firms have made large investments in U.S. facilities and continue to operate them by the same market logic that would govern domestic ownership.

He also points out it is unclear who else would be in a position to make such significant investments if these foreign companies were not involved. This pragmatic view suggests the ownership issue might be less important than is commonly believed, at least concerning everyday operations and market outcomes.

A Lot Hinges on Rebuilding the Cow Herd

In his latest article, “ All Bets are Off ,” Peel says: “The latest edition in the torrent of recent political attentions directed at the cattle and beef industry includes allegations of market manipulation against the beef packing industry. Beef packers are the one segment that has been most negatively impacted in the current market, incurring huge losses due to poor margins and limited cattle supplies.”

(Meat Institute)

Peel reports packers have been losing enormous amounts of money for about the past 18 to 24 months. According to the Meat Institute, packer margins slipped into the red in September 2024. Through the week ending Oct. 4, 2025, packer margins were a negative $126.50 per head, up slightly from a year earlier at a negative $125.65 per head, according to Sterling Profit Tracker. The outlook for the year is a negative $165.96 per head packer margin.

“There’s just simply not enough cattle for them to operate at cost efficient capacities,” Peel explains.

This negative trend was anticipated — the reduced supply of cattle has made it difficult for packing plants to function at cost-efficient capacities, leading to the accumulation of operating losses. Peel points out the combination of low unit margins and insufficient cattle supplies challenges the economic viability of packers, further illustrating the complexity of the current environment.

This decline in inventory is not the result of a single factor but is driven by several years of drought and other market pressures. It is clear high beef and cattle prices are a result of these tight supplies and, according to Peel, these high prices are likely to persist for several years. The industry simply cannot turn around production levels quickly, and it will take time — a matter of years, not months — for conditions to normalize.

“Using logic that only works in the office of a politician, packers are supposedly wielding unacceptable market power while paying record high cattle prices and artificially raising beef prices … but not enough to avoid losing a couple hundred dollars on every animal they process — certainly many millions of dollars,” Peel says. “If beef packers had any significant ability to exercise market power, I am certain that we would not have record high cattle prices and packers would not be losing money.”

Peel suggests the federal government attacks on beef packers are aided and supported by a vocal minority of the cattle industry and a few sympathetic politicians who view packers as a perennial villain and always worthy of attack anytime the opportunity is presented.

“The timing of such attacks this time is particularly puzzling as dismantling the packing industry would certainly jeopardize current record high cattle prices and the best economic returns most producers have ever enjoyed,” Peels says. “I guess some cowboys just can’t stand prosperity.”

R-CALF CEO Bill Bullard says the cattle market is fundamentally broken citing years of an inverse relationship between falling cattle prices and increasing retail beef prices when the only ingredient in beef is cattle. Read more about his perspective.

Patience not Politics

Beef and cattle prices, Peel notes, are historically high, a result of industry-wide low cattle inventory. Rebuilding the nation’s cow herd will be a long, slow process, keeping prices elevated for an extended period. And Peel says there is no definitive evidence producers are saving heifers to start the rebuilding process.

“2025 may prove to be technically the cyclical low, but 2026 is going to be barely bigger, if it is, and no growth in 2026 and probably none in 2027 ... it’s 2028 into 2029 before that turns into increased beef production,” Peel predicts.

He summarizes neither regulatory nor political action will can speed up the rebuilding process. It will take years of concerted effort, market healing and stability before the industry can expect a meaningful rebound in herd numbers and production — a reality that requires patience across the industry.

“There is absolutely nothing anybody can do to make beef prices go down, or cattle prices, other than maybe tear up the industry completely,” Peels says. “And if we tear up the industry, it’ll make cattle prices go down, but it won’t make beef prices go down. It’ll make beef prices go even higher for consumers and the only way to fix this is to give the industry time to rebuild, and that’s going to take two to four years if we ever get started.”

He says a majority of cattle producers understand the beef industry is extremely complex and all segments are critical and essential.

“Though the outcome of current political actions is uncertain, the potential for long-term harm to the industry is substantial,” Peel says. “Anytime politics trumps economics, the strong supply and demand fundamentals that have determined the outlook for the industry to this point become irrelevant. Expectations for prices and production going forward are now completely clouded…therefore… all bets are off.”

Your Next Read: You Be The Judge: The Big Bad Beef Packers Are On Trial