Farm Journal · September 2026 report

A fertilizer market full of wild cards shapes 2027 buying

With global supply, production costs and geopolitics all in flux, the September panel for the Ag Economists Monthly Monitor is advising growers to hedge their fertilizer bets. Forty-four percent recommend pricing a portion of 2027 needs now and leaving the rest open, 28% would lock in most or all of it this fall and just 11% would hold cash for spring. Most don't expect a price decline: only 11% see spring wholesale fertilizer prices coming down. Meanwhile, the Ag Economy Index — a composite of three questions asked every month — slipped to 53 from July's 61 as the 12-month outlook dipped below neutral.

Key Takeaways from the September Panel

Hedge the fertilizer bill, brace for costly inputs.

The panel's fertilizer advice reflects uncertainty, not conviction. Forty-four percent recommend buying a portion of 2027 fertilizer now and waiting to price the rest, 28% recommend locking in most or all needs this fall and 11% would hold cash for potential spring pricing. The largest share — 35% — point to where they expect fertilizer prices to go between now and spring as the reason.

Few expect relief. Thirty-nine percent expect wholesale fertilizer prices next spring to be modestly higher and 33% expect them to stay about where they are. Energy costs tell a similar story: 67% call EIA's $4.40-a-gallon 2027 diesel forecast too optimistic, and 84% say input and energy costs will matter most to rural voters this election cycle.

Near-term sentiment held up — 58% say the ag economy is better off than a month ago — but the forward view softened. Thirty-two percent expect conditions to be worse in 12 months against 26% who expect them to be better, pulling the Ag Economy Index down to 53.

Three numbers at a glance
44%Recommend pricing a portion of 2027 fertilizer nowAnother 28% would lock in most or all needs this fall; 11% would wait for spring
53Ag Economy Index for SeptemberDown 8 points from July's 61 as the 12-month outlook slipped below neutral
84%Say input and energy costs matter most to rural votersFar ahead of trade and export policy at 11%
Ag Economy Index · monthly composite

The September reading slipped to 53

Combined Index · September 2026
53
▼ 8 pts from July's 61
0 · all worse50 · neutral100 · all better

Each bar shows how that tracking question nets out on a 0–100 scale where 50 is neutral — the share of economists calling conditions better minus those calling them worse. The headline reading is the report's monthly composite, weighted 20/20/60 toward the 12-month outlook.

Conditions vs. last monthabove neutral
66
Conditions vs. last yearabove neutral
55
12-month outlookbelow neutral
47
Net sentiment per tracking question · 0–100, 50 = neutral · n = 19 · no August survey
Open-ended panel question

Factors driving agriculture's next 12 months

Input costs — especially fuel and fertilizer

Input costs, particularly fuel and fertilizer costs. National corn and soybean yield estimates.
High input costs — diesel fuel is high, interest rates look to be increasing, fertilizer, labor, etc. — and the impact of geopolitics on markets.
Global commodity prices and energy-related input costs (fertilizer, fuel and transportation costs).

Commodity prices and the size of the 2026 crop

The supply-demand balances and associated market prices for the major U.S. grain and oilseed crops — resulting from the final 2026 grain harvests.
Commodity prices — tied to trade with China, trade with Canada, war with Iran, Russia's war with Ukraine, crop size. Input prices — tied to most of those issues.
Trade dynamics, particularly export demand for all crop and livestock commodities. Cost of crop inputs as we approach fall and spring buying.

Geopolitics, energy markets and logistics

War and peace in Iran and Ukraine. The weather.
Interest rates and the evolution of the two wars on commodity logistics.
The state of world and U.S. energy and related bioenergy markets in 12 months. As goes energy markets goes diesel fuel, ag crop inputs, food demand, inflation, and the health of the U.S. and world economies.
Monthly tracking · same questions, every month

The state of the U.S. ag economy

Conditions vs. last month

58% call conditions better than a month ago

Much better off
5%
Somewhat better off
53%
Unchanged
16%
Somewhat worse off
26%
Much worse off
0%
n = 19Sep 2026
Conditions vs. last year

47% see improvement over a year ago

Much better off
5%
Somewhat better off
42%
Unchanged
16%
Somewhat worse off
32%
Much worse off
5%
n = 19Sep 2026
Outlook · 12 months ahead

More expect a worse year ahead than a better one

Much better off
5%
Somewhat better off
21%
Unchanged
42%
Somewhat worse off
32%
Much worse off
0%
n = 19Sep 2026
September Assessment · 2027 fertilizer

Price a portion now, leave the rest open

Geopolitical turmoil continues to shape global fertilizer supply and demand, but its impact varies sharply among nitrogen, phosphorus and potash — and sulfur has emerged as an unexpected pressure point for phosphate. That leaves corn and soybean growers with a tough call on how much of their 2027 inputs to price this fall.

2027 purchasing strategy

Just 11% would wait for spring.

When asked which fertilizer purchasing strategy best positions a typical commercial corn grower in their region for 2027, 44% recommend buying a portion now and waiting to price the rest. Another 28% recommend locking in most or all needs this fall. The split reflects the uncertainty surrounding where fertilizer prices are headed.

Lock in a portion now, leave the remainder open
44%
Lock in most or all needs now (fall)
28%
Hold cash and wait for spring pricing
11%
No clear advantage between approaches
11%
Unsure
6%
Best-positioned fertilizer strategy for 2027 · n = 18 · Sep 2026

Price direction drives the call

The largest share of economists — 35% — cite their expectations for fertilizer prices between now and next spring as the primary reason behind their recommendation.

Expected direction of fertilizer prices
35%
Working capital or liquidity position
18%
Supply and delivery risk
18%
Other (tax management, policy, war outcomes)
29%
Expected 2027 corn acreage and demand
0%
Primary factor behind the purchasing recommendation · n = 17 · Sep 2026

Most don't expect a price decline

Half the panel expects spring wholesale fertilizer prices to be higher than today and another third expects them to hold. For nitrogen, nearly 43% expect spring 2027 anhydrous ammonia to average $800 to $860 per ton in their region, while 57% expect $950 to $1,150.

Spring wholesale fertilizer prices vs. today

Only 11% expect prices to come down

Significantly higher (>10%)
11%
Modestly higher (up to 10%)
39%
About the same
33%
Modestly lower (up to 10%)
11%
Significantly lower (>10%)
0%
Unsure
6%
Compared with current levels · n = 18 · Sep 2026
Expected spring 2027 anhydrous price ($/ton)

56% expect $950 to $1,150 per ton

$800
29%
$860
14%
$950
14%
$1,000
14%
$1,100
14%
$1,150
14%
Average regional price, spring 2027 · n = 7 · Sep 2026
$945Avg. anhydrous, per ton

The benchmark for this fall

USDA Agricultural Marketing Service data put the average anhydrous ammonia price at $945 per ton for the week ending Oct. 2 — squarely between the panel's two camps for spring 2027.

Three nutrients, three different stories

Corey Rosenbusch, CEO of The Fertilizer Institute, says geopolitics remain the biggest factor in global fertilizer markets, but those forces are hitting each nutrient differently.

Nitrogen

China's urea could ease a tight market

After years of export restrictions, China appears to be easing its stance on urea, with reports that Chinese urea production is up roughly 30%. A significant return could shift the global nitrogen balance.

Phosphate

Sulfur is the new pressure point

Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz pushed sulfur as high as $1,300 per metric ton, idling some MAP and DAP production. Analysts estimate global phosphate output could fall by as much as 30 million metric tons next year.

Potash

Belarus returns, Canada still matters

Belarusian potash is returning after sanctions were lifted, but it is priced in line with the global market plus freight — and won't replace the volumes U.S. growers receive from Canada.

“The thing that has stayed the same is that geopolitics continue to be the biggest factor driving global fertilizer markets supply and demand. What has changed is how those forces are affecting each nutrient.”
Corey Rosenbusch
The Fertilizer Institute · CEO
“It doesn't make sense for $1,300 sulfur to make MAP and DAP at $700. This is not a supply issue. It is a cost of production issue.”
Corey Rosenbusch
The Fertilizer Institute · CEO
Worth noting

New domestic capacity — including ammonia and phosphate facilities breaking ground in Louisiana and a $500 million USDA program — could strengthen the U.S. supply chain, but won't mean cheaper fertilizer overnight. A new ammonia plant can cost $4 billion to $5 billion and take years to reach full production, and U.S.-made product still prices in line with the global market.

The fertilizer equation is a commodity-price equation

After years of high prices and reduced applications, Rosenbusch says some growers are reaching the point where they need to replenish phosphorus and potash removed with the crop — on top of high costs for diesel, interest, equipment and land.

“We really need to get higher commodity prices. Otherwise, farmers are not going to be able to sustain their input costs at this level.”
Corey Rosenbusch
The Fertilizer Institute · CEO
September Assessment · Corn economics

Corn's cost line runs near $4.75

2027 full economic cost of production

A median breakeven of $4.75 a bushel.

When asked what cash corn price covers the full economic cost of production for an average Corn Belt grower in 2027, estimates ranged from $4.00 to $5.25, with a median of $4.75 and an average of $4.76. Eight in 10 put the number at $4.50 or higher.

$4.00 – $4.49
20%
$4.50 – $4.99
40%
$5.00 – $5.49
40%
Estimated 2027 Corn Belt breakeven, grouped · n = 15 · Sep 2026

Balancing growers against feeders

There's no consensus on the corn price that balances row-crop profitability against feed costs for livestock, dairy and poultry producers — the panel splits evenly across the $4.00 to $5.49 range.

Under $4.00
0%
$4.00 – $4.49
24%
$4.50 – $4.99
24%
$5.00 – $5.49
24%
$5.50 and up
12%
Unsure
18%
Corn price range that best balances crop and livestock economics · n = 17 · Sep 2026

Thin carry, thinner cushions

Heading into winter, more than half the panel says the average commercial row-crop operation's working capital is weaker than a year ago — the same pressure that weighs on fertilizer purchasing decisions.

Return for storing corn & soybeans into spring

Half are unsure the carry pays

Carry more than covers costs
11%
Roughly breakeven
22%
Carry does not cover costs
17%
Unsure
50%
Based on current futures spreads and local basis · n = 18 · Sep 2026
Row-crop working capital vs. a year ago

56% say working capital is weaker

Modestly stronger
17%
About the same
28%
Modestly weaker
44%
Meaningfully weaker
11%
Average commercial row-crop operation heading into winter · n = 18 · Sep 2026
September Assessment · Diesel & interest rates

Diesel relief looks a year or more away

EIA's September Short-Term Energy Outlook projects retail diesel averaging $5.07 a gallon in 2026 and easing to $4.40 in 2027 as crude production recovers. Diesel averaged near $5.97 in early September, a nominal record. The panel isn't counting on a quick decline.

When will retail diesel fall below $4.50/gal?

Most say one to two years

Within 6 months
0%
6–12 months
28%
1–2 years
56%
3+ years
11%
Unsure
6%
Diesel averaged near $5.97 in early September · n = 18 · Sep 2026
EIA's $4.40 diesel forecast for 2027 is…

Two-thirds call EIA's forecast too optimistic

Too optimistic
67%
About right
28%
Too pessimistic
6%
EIA September Short-Term Energy Outlook · n = 18 · Sep 2026

The Fed's first hike since 2023

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate 25 basis points on Sept. 16 to a target range of 3.75% to 4%. A third of the panel says higher carrying costs on operating notes will have the greatest impact on farm operations over the next 12 months — while another third say higher rates aren't among the top risks to farm balance sheets.

Higher carrying costs on operating notes
33%
Higher rates are not a top balance-sheet risk
33%
Deferred machinery & equipment purchases
17%
Refinancing risk on term debt
11%
Higher cost of carrying stored grain
6%
Downward pressure on land values & rents
0%
Greatest impact of the rate increase over 12 months · n = 18 · Sep 2026 · 67% somewhat confident in their answer
September Assessment · Acres & the midterms

Input costs top the rural ballot

USDA projects a decline of roughly 6 million acres in major U.S. field crop plantings over the next decade. The largest share of the panel blames lost export competitiveness to South America.

Loss of export competitiveness to South America
44%
Rising trendline yields on fewer acres
17%
The decline is unlikely to materialize
17%
Farmland conversion (development, solar)
11%
Shifts among crops, not a net decline
11%
Primary driver of USDA's projected acreage decline · n = 18 · Sep 2026

The midterms matter — and so does the cost of inputs

Congress returns in November with the Senate farm bill awaiting a floor vote, the 2018 Farm Bill extension expired and diesel at nominal record highs.

How significant are the November midterms?

Three in four say at least somewhat significant

Very significant
21%
Somewhat significant
53%
Minimally significant
26%
For farm and rural economic policy · n = 19 · Sep 2026
Issue that matters most to rural voters

84% say input and energy costs

Input and energy costs
84%
Trade and export policy
11%
Healthcare and rural services
5%
Farm bill completion
0%
Interest rates and credit
0%
This election cycle · n = 19 · Sep 2026
September Assessment · open-ended

The risks and opportunities few are talking about

When asked for the most underappreciated risk or opportunity facing U.S. agriculture heading into 2027, the panel pointed to energy and biofuel demand, policy shifts, the broader economy — and the long-run question of U.S. food security.

"
The U.S. is becoming less food secure. Policy, regulation, labor, inputs and competition for water are all making it more difficult for agriculture, so we import ever larger shares of our fruits and vegetables, and now were increasing beef imports. Let's not forget that food security is really national security.
Food security
"
Biofuel development is going to be a big deal again. High fuel prices and increasing incentives (policy- and market-driven) will increase global biofuel demand. That will be a developing story in 2027.
Biofuel demand
"
An unexpected weakening of the economy, perhaps due to changing views on the future of AI, could weaken global demand and prices of both farm inputs and outputs.
A weaker general economy
"
Continued overproduction driven by insurance payments creating a lower for longer commodity price cycle.
Overproduction
"
I am getting more and more worried about re-opening of RVOs; they did not look obtainable in the most recent report.
RFS volume obligations
"
Growth in U.S. bioenergy production (ethanol and renewable diesel) to help moderate tight U.S. gasoline and biodiesel market conditions and fuel prices to U.S. fuel users.
U.S. bioenergy growth
"
Terms of trade with Mexico and Canada.
USMCA review
"
Upside risk to energy prices. Higher interest rates. Inflationary pressures on consumer demand.
Energy and interest costs

About the Ag Economist Monthly Monitor

The Ag Economists Monthly Monitor is administered by Farm Journal and published on AgWeb. Each survey is administered to a vetted list of agricultural economists from across the United States.

Three of those questions repeat every survey, so changes can be tracked over time: current conditions vs. the prior month, current conditions vs. a year ago and the panel's outlook for the next twelve months. The trend chart plots those three categories. The composite sentiment index is a rebase of the four response shares to a single 0–100 number.

Responses are anonymous. Economists give the unvarnished view they cannot always offer with their name attached, and the panel composition is broad enough to cover crop, livestock, policy and ag finance perspectives. Reporting and analysis are produced by the AgWeb editorial team and overviews are aired on AgDay, AgriTalk and U.S. Farm Report.

Ask our editors a question

Have a question about the report findings? Send it straight to our editorial team. Are you an agricultural economist? Tell us if you’d like to be considered for future survey panels.

Opens in your email app
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App