John Phipps: Is the Solution to Moving Grain Faster an Upgrade to U.S. Railways?

For a developed country as large as the US, we are almost unique in our lack of robust rail capabilities. John Phipps answers a viewer’s question about the possibility of updating the rail system to move grain faster.

A U.S. Farm report viewer sent in a question about the nation’s rail system.

Kevin Boerson from Kalamazoo, Mich., had this question for Customer Support:

“My question concerns the rail system in United States, as it pertains to delivering corn and grain, to shipping ports, from all places around the country. I was wondering if we are improving the rail system as in updating sidetracks and loading facilities, so we can move more grain at a faster pace, and not get behind during shipping season. Are we upgrading the rail system or are we using the same tracks and system we have been using for the last 50 years?”

For a developed country as large as the US, we are almost unique in our lack of robust rail capabilities. It’s most apparent for passenger travel, of course, but that dwindling demand affects our rail freight system as well. The key driver is the American emphasis on roads over rails. For instance, when we talk about upgrading our infrastructure, we invariably use the phrase “roads and bridges” – not railroads.

Trucks carry 40% to rail’s 28% of US Freight. About half of all rail shipments are commodities. Of that 52 percent here is a somewhat outdated division of commodity shipments from 2014. Farm products are only 8% of that half. From a railroad management point of view, the enormous cost of laying new track or even upgrading existing track that serves ag commodities doesn’t look like a money maker.

Overall rail freight is flat or slowly declining as well. The other problem for railroads is the seasonality of grain shipments due to harvest timing, unlike the steady flow of coal, for example. Location also plays a role. We have acceptable freight service in my area, as our corn is largely shipped to southeastern livestock buyers, in large quantities year-round.

As more corn in grown in former wheat country, shipping will become more problematic. Unlike other countries, US railroads are regulated but privately owned and receive much less government support.

I’ve met few farmers who think their elevators have enough rail service, especially at harvest. On the whole, the system is managing but has little spare capacity to handle extreme shipping volatility like droughts or perversely surprisingly large harvests.

With coal freight likely to decline, the probability of more and better rail will decline with it.

You can also read more of John’s U.S. Farm Report commentaries.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Lane Akre, economist with Pro Farmer, says the corn made new highs on Friday but may have to go higher with their big yield cut of 7.5 bu. from USDA’s August estimate.
Pro Farmer Crop Tour scouts discovered a corn crop that didn’t live up to expectations, with Pro Farmer pegging the national yield at 173.2 bu. per acre, well below USDA’s 180.7 current estimate.
Scouts say early-season weather stress reduced corn ear counts and grain length and cut stands across the Corn Belt, but above-average soybean pod numbers mean farmers could harvest a record bean crop this fall.
Read Next
Day 3 of the Pro Farmer Crop Tour reveals low ear counts dragging down rain-weary Illinois fields, while Western Iowa corn flashes standout potential despite rising SDS and brown stem rot in soybeans.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App