Strip-till Improves Nutrient Uptake and Yield

The practice of deep-banding fertilizer is growing in popularity; however, this method may be costing growers more than it is worth.

By Jennifer Shike, University of Illinois


The practice of deep banding fertilizer is growing in popularity as more growers turn to strip-till. However, this method may be costing growers more than it is worth.

A new University of Illinois study revealed that strip-till was superior to no-till and increased yield in soybean. However, the results showed no difference in yield between fertilizer application methods.

“Strip-till is usually talked about in corn, not soybean,” said Fabian Fernandez, U of I assistant professor of crop sciences. “But the results argue strip-till for soybean would be a benefit, but placement of fertilizer offers no difference for yield.”

Researchers compared different combinations of phosphorus and potassium rates applied in no-till by either broadcasting or deep-banding six inches below the surface, and in strip-till by deep banding six inches below the surface.

“Strip-till allows growers to apply fertilizer in a band in the subsurface — it has almost become the norm these days,” Fernandez said. “Most growers are deep banding fertilizer if they strip-till, when in reality there is no need to do this, at least for soybean. Our research shows when fertility levels are adequate, there is no advantage and you can broadcast phosphorus and potassium to achieve the same results.”

Fernandez said deep band placement normally requires more equipment, expense and time.

“Phosphorus doesn’t move far in the soil. With broadcast application, it tends to accumulate at the soil surface,” Fernandez said. “With subsurface application, we saw phosphorus levels decrease on the soil surface. Although subsurface band applications may not increase yield, they could decrease phosphorus levels on the surface which could be an environmental benefit to reduce the potential of phosphorus runoff.”

Subsurface banding of fertilizers is sometimes promoted as a more efficient placement method, and some believe the same yield level can be attained with lower fertilizer rates, Fernandez said.

“We observed no evidence to suggest a fertilizer rate reduction can be accomplished with subsurface banding without similar yield declines as observed for broadcast applications,” he said.


For More Information
Read more crop news.



AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
Mike Zuzolo with Global Commodity Analytics says corn and soybeans saw a technical bounce after a lower day on Friday but were still supported by higher energy markets and inflation fears. Wheat fell after the President’s post about Russia and Ukraine agreeing not to target energy and food infrastructure.
The Evansville facility will be Wisconsin’s first large-scale soybean crush plant — processing 80 million bushels annually and lifting CHS’s total crush capacity by more than two-thirds when it opens in 2028.
Warm fall conditions could push back the window for safe, effective anhydrous and manure applications across parts of the Midwest, says Iowa State agronomist.
Read Next
Sulfur prices have surged more than fivefold, threatening phosphate fertilizer production. With global supply tightening, farmers could face higher prices, or even fertilizer shortages, heading into the months ahead.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App