Monsanto Asks for Plant Board Member Removal

In an affidavit, Monsanto describes actions by Arkansas Plant Board member Terry Fuller as biased and says it calls into question the fairness of the entire public record in relation to a proposed in-season herbicide ban.

dicamba damage in illinois
dicamba damage in illinois
(Sonja Begemann)

In an affidavit, Monsanto describes actions by Arkansas Plant Board member Terry Fuller as biased and says it calls into question the fairness of the entire public record in relation to a proposed in-season herbicide ban.

“On Oct. 23, 2017, Monsanto received a copy of an email that originated from Plant Board member Terry Fuller that calls into question Mr. Fuller’s impartiality,” the affidavit states. “Mr. Fuller’s email improperly solicits the submission of public comments in support of the Plant Board’s proposed dicamba rules and attaches three form letters, drafted to be submitted as public comments, that each advocate for the proposed dicamba restrictions.”

Because of these claims, the company is asking that Fuller is disqualified from participating in rulemakings related to the dicamba herbicide. In addition to his removal Monsanto is asking to strike all signed form letters attached to Fuller’s email and that all actions are taken to ensure no other bias is present on the Plant Board.

Monsanto’s claims are based on the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act (APA) which requires all presiding and participating officers to “conduct themselves in an impartial manner.” APA says members may withdraw at any time if they deem themselves unqualified and any party can file an affidavit of personal bias or disqualification.

The Arkansas Plant board denied the opportunity to comment on this issue.

Monsanto asked this issue to be addressed before the Nov. 8, 2017 public hearing in relation to the proposed dicamba rule.

AgWeb-Logo crop
Related Stories
The joint letter highlights a 150% spike in fertilizer prices and calls for immediate relief for the struggling U.S. farm economy.
Some of the easier entry points for corn and soybean farmers looking to capture higher returns can deliver $200 or more per acre.
David Hula and Randy Dowdy explain why precise seed spacing is no longer a requirement just for high corn yields.
Read Next
The change implements provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and updates long-standing Farm Service Agency rules that had capped many entity-based operations at a single payment limit.
Get News Daily
Get Market Alerts
Get News & Markets App